Abstract
In this paper, we demonstrate how craft practice in contemporary jewellery opens up conceptions of ‘digital jewellery’ to possibilities beyond merely embedding pre-existing behaviours of digital systems in objects, which follow shallow interpretations of jewellery. We argue that a design approach that understands jewellery only in terms of location on the body is likely to lead to a world of ‘gadgets’, rather than anything that deserves the moniker ‘jewellery’. In contrast, by adopting a craft approach, we demonstrate that the space of digital jewellery can include objects where the digital functionality is integrated as one facet of an object that can be personally meaningful for the holder or wearer.






Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Bartels U, Lindmark Vrijman M (2002) Accessed on 30/06/05 KPZ-02 http://www.projects2realate.net/
Gaver W (2001) The presence project. RCA CRD Research Publications
Pye D (1968) The nature and art of workmanship. Cambridge University Press, London
Schwartz E (n.d.) Accessed on 30/06/05. Wireless wearable digital jewellery and more, in Infoworld http://www.infoworld.com/articles/op/xml/00/08/07/000807opwireless.html
Wallace J, Dearden A (2005) Digital jewellery as experience. In: Pirhonen A, Isomaki H, Roast C, Saarilouma P (eds) Future interaction design, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wallace, J., Dearden, A. & Fisher, T. The significant other: the value of jewellery in the conception, design and experience of body focused digital devices. AI & Soc 22, 53–62 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-006-0070-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-006-0070-5