Skip to main content

From Taylorism to competence-based production

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During the four decades of my professional career, manufacturing has been subdued to a radical change from objectifying to subjectifying work. The evolution of the originally prevailing Taylor model with its functionally divided and highly mechanised work processes culminated in the 1980s in the rise and fall of computer integrated manufacturing (CIM) contested by the alternative approach of human-centred production systems. The change process then went through phases of confusion and experimentation, in which competence-based manufacturing strategies and structures have been crystallising in sharp contrast to the majority of less sustainable forms of organisational renewal. The paper reflects on main features of this transformation process as it has been mirrored in my own research work and relates major findings to the work of others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Adler PS, Winograd TA (eds) (1992) Usability: turning technologies into tools. Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford

  • Babbage C (1835) On the economy of machinery and manufactures. Knight, London (reprint Kelley, New York, 1971)

  • Badham R, Couchman P, Zanko M (2000) Implementing concurrent engineering. Hum Factors Ergon Manuf 10(3):237–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böhle F (1994) Relevance of experience-based work in modern processes. AI & Soc J Hum Centered Syst Mach Intell 8(3):207–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Braverman H (1974) Labor and monopoly capital: the degradation of work in the twentieth century. Monthly Review Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brödner P (1990) The shape of future technology. The anthropocentric alternative. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Brödner P (1991) Design of work and technology in manufacturing. Int J Hum Factors Manuf 1(1):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Brödner P (1994) Design of work and technology. In: Salvendy G, Karwowski W (eds) Design of work and development of personnel in advanced manufacturing, Wiley, New York, pp 125–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Brödner P (1997) Der überlistete Odysseus. Über das zerrüttete Verhältnis von Menschen und Maschinen (Odysseus Outwitted), Berlin: edition sigma

  • Brödner P (2000) Organisational learning: beyond continuous improvement. In: Gertsen F (ed) CI 2000. From improvement to innovation, proceedings of the 3rd CINet conference. Aalborg University, Aalborg, pp 29–40

  • Brödner P (2001) Sociotechnical systems development and concurrent engineering. In: Smith MJ, Salvendy G (eds) Systems, social and internationalization design aspects of human-computer interaction. Proceedings of HCI international 2001, vol 2. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 38–42

  • Brödner P (2006) Digital organisations and the semiotic nature of IT. AI Soc J Hum Centered Syst Mach Intell (forthcoming)

  • Brödner P, Forslin J (2002) O tempora. o mores! Work intensity—why again an issue? In: Docherty P, Forslin J, Shani RB (eds) Creating sustainable work systems: emerging perspectives and practice, Routledge, London, pp 15–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Brödner P, Latniak E (2004) Recent findings on organizational changes in german industry. J Manuf Technol Manage 15(4):360–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brödner P, Garibaldo F, Oehlke P, Pekruhl U (1998) Work organisation and employment. The crucial role of innovation strategies. Projektbericht des Instituts Arbeit und Technik 1998-05. IAT, Gelsenkirchen

  • Brown JS, Duguid P (1991) Organizational learning and communities-of-practice. Organ Sci 2(1):40–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEC (2000) The Lisbon European Council—an agenda of economic and social renewal for Europe, DOC/00/7 February 28. European Commission, Brussels

  • Cherns AB (1987) Principles of sociotechnical design revisited. Hum Relat 40:153–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett M, Rasmussen L, Rauner F (1991) Crossing the border: the social and engineering design of computer integrated manufacturing systems. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TH (1998) Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. Harv Bus Rev 76(4):121–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus HL (1979) What computers can’t do. The limits of artificial intelligence. Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker PF (1994) The age of social transformation. Atl Mon 11:53–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman GM (1992) Bright air, brilliant fire—on the matter of the mind. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill K (ed) (1996) Human machine symbiosis. In: The foundations of human-centred systems design. Springer, London

  • Hamel G, Prahalad CK (1994) Competing for the future. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmstädter E (ed) (2003) The economics of knowledge sharing. In: A new institutional approach. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

  • Hunt VD (1989) Computer integrated manufacturing handbook. Kluwer Academic Publ, London New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddison A (1994) Explaining performance of nations, 1820–1989. In: Baumol WJ, Nelson RR, Wolff EN (eds) Convergence of productivity: cross-national studies and historical evidence, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Moldaschl M, Brödner P (2002) A reflexive methodology of intervention. In: Docherty P, Forslin J, Shani RB (eds) Creating sustainable work systems: emerging perspectives and practice. Routledge, London, pp 179–189

  • Newell A (1980) Physical symbol systems. Cogn Sci 4:135–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson NJ (1982) Principles of artificial intelligence. Springer, Berlin

  • Noble DF (1984) Forces of production. A social history of industrial automation. Knopf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The knowledge creating company. How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman DA (1993) Things that make us smart. Defending human attributes in the age of the machine. Addison-Wesley, Reading

  • Pasmore WA (1988) Designing effective organisations: the socio-technical systems perspective. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Piore MJ, Sabel CF (1984) The second industrial divide. Possibilities for prosperity. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi M (1966) The tacit dimension. Doubleday, Garden City

    Google Scholar 

  • Pylyshyn Z (1984) Computation and cognition. Towards a foundation of cognitive science. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich RB (1991) The work of nations. Knopf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle G (1967) The concept of mind. Hutchinson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheer A-W (1990) CIM, computer integrated manufacturing, 4th edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Schon DA (1983) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge PM (1990) The fifth discipline. The art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday, New York

  • Smith A (1776) An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. A selected edition. Oxford University Press, Oxford New York, p 1998

  • Stewart TA (1997) Intellectual capital. The new wealth of organizations. Doubleday, New York

  • Taylor FW (1911) The principles of scientific management. Harper & Brothers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheelwright SC, Clark KB (1992) Revolutionizing product development: quantum leaps in speed, efficiency, and quality. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson DTN (1972) The anachronistic factory. Proc R Soc Lond A331:139–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd T, Flores F (1986) Understanding computers and cognition. A new foundation for design. Ablex Publ., Norwood

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Womack JP, Jones DT, Roos D (1990) The machine that changed the world. Scribner Book Co., New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Brödner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brödner, P. From Taylorism to competence-based production. AI & Soc 21, 497–514 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-007-0087-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-007-0087-4

Keywords