Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Caregiving robots and ethical reflection: the perspective of interdisciplinary technology assessment

  • Original Article
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Autonomous robots that are capable of learning are being developed to make it easier for human actors to achieve their goals. As such, robots are primarily a means to an end and replace human actions (or parts of them). An interdisciplinary technology assessment was carried out to determine the extent to which a replacement of this kind makes ethical sense in terms of technology, economics and legal aspects. Proceeding from an ethical perspective, derived from Kant’s formula of humanity, in this article we analyse the use of robots in the care of the elderly or infirm and then examine robot learning in the context of this kind of cooperation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Notes

  1. The Association for German Engineers.

  2. Know Library (http://roboter.know-library.net/) visited 26 February 2007.

  3. Kant 1785, p. 429: “Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of another, always at the same time as an end and never as a means”.

  4. Technology assessment combines deontological and teleological ethics (Gethmann and Kamp 2001) to justify its recommendations to act. The first refers to general principles and leads to what should be done, while the latter takes into account the consequences and utility aspects of actions.

  5. Schmidt and Krämer (2006) also conducted a terminological investigation on autonomy. They asked whether robots could and should really be autonomous entities and used “the philosophy of mind to spur on enquiry into the very essence of human autonomy.”

  6. The categorical imperative bases human action firmly in a binding moral law: "act according to the maxim which at the same time can make itself a universal law " (Kant 1785, p. 436 f).

  7. The German Worker Welfare organization (Arbeiterwohlfahrt) estimates the lack of caregivers in Germany to be 40,000 (AWO 2004). Worldwide the World Health Organisation estimates a shortage of more than 4 million doctors, nurses, midwives and others (WHO 2006, p. 11).

  8. Council Directive of 27 June 1977 concerning the coordination of provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in respect of the activities of nurses responsible for general care (77/453/EEC), ABl L 176/1977, 8, modified directive 89/595/EWG, ABl. L 341/1989, S. 30.

  9. This veto function has been mentioned in another recommendation to act, which refers to the position of the human being within the control hierarchy of the robot.

  10. http://www.sfb588.uni-karlsruhe.de visited 28.2.2007.

References

  • Allen C, Wendell W, Smit I (2006) Why machine ethics? IEEE Intelligent Sytems, July/August, pp 12–17

  • Amann B (2006) Sprachausgabe für Care-O-bot. Diplomarbeit Nr.46, Institut für maschinelle Sprachverarbeitung, Universität Stuttgart

  • Anderson M, Anderson SL (2006) Machine ethics. Guest editors’ introduction. IEEE Intelligent Systems, July/August, p 10–11

  • AWO (2004) Sozialbericht 2003/2004 der Arbeiterwohlfahrt nach Pressemitteilung vom, 2.6.2004

  • BCCN (2006) Wissenschaftler im Portrait: Florentin Wörgötter: Roboter, die spielend lernen. Newsletter der Centers for computational neuroscience 06/2006, Berlin

  • Brooks RA (1997) The Cog project. J Robot Soc Japan 15(7):S968–S970

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks RA, Stein LA (1994) Building brains for bodies. Auton Robots 1(1):S7– S25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burattini E, Datteri E, Tamburrini G (2005) Neuro-symbolic programs for robots. In: Proceedings of NeSy’05 neural-symbolic learning and reasoning. Workshop at IJCAI-05, Edinburgh, Scotland

  • Christaller T, Decker M, Gilsbach J-M, Hirzinger G, Lauterbach K, Schweighofer E, Schweitzer G, Sturma D (2001) Robotik. Perspektiven für menschliches Handeln in der zukünftigen Gesellschaft. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Decker M (1997) Perspektiven der Robotik. Überlegungen zur Ersetzbarkeit des Menschen. Graue Reihe Bd. 8, Europäische Akademie Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler

  • Decker M, Grunwald A (2001) Rational technology assessment as interdisciplinary research. In: Decker M (ed) Interdisciplinarity in technology assessment. Implementation and its chances and limits. Springer, Berlin, pp 33–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Dengel A (1994) Künstliche Intelligenz. Allgemeine Prinzipien und Modelle. Mannheim

  • Garcez AS, Lamb LC (2004) Reasoning about time and knowledge in neural-symbolic learning systems. In: Thrun S, Saul L, Schoelkopf B (eds) Advances in neural information processing systems 16. MIT Press, Cambridge

  • Gethmann CF, Kamp G (2001) Gradierung und Diskontierung von Verbindlichkeiten bei der Langzeitverpflichtung. In: Mittelstraß, J. (Hg.) Die Zukunft des Wissens. Berlin pp 281–295

  • Gethmann CF, Sander T (1999) Rechtfertigungsdiskurse. In: Grunwald A, Saupe S (Hrsg.) Ethik in der Technikgestaltung. Praktische Relevanz und Legitimation. Springer, Berlin

  • Hans M, Graf B, Schraft RD (2002) Robotic home sssistant Care-O-bot: past—present—future. In: Proceedings of the 11th IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication, ROMAN2002, Berlin, Germany, pp 380–385

  • Hitzler P (2004) Nichtmonotone, neuro-symbolische und begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung. Fakultät Informatik, TU-Dresden

  • ISO 8373 (1994) Manipulating industrial robots, vocabulary. International organization for standardization, Geneva

  • Kaeser E (2004) Autonome Artefakte. Ein Testfall für die Autonomie des Menschen? In: Soziale Welt 55, pp 369–388

  • Kant I (1785) Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. In Werke, Akademieausgabe. Berlin: Band IV, 1968

  • Kobel S (2006) Der künstliche Altenpfleger Riken Ri-Man. Futurebytes.ch—Das Schweizer Trendonlinemagazin, 21.3.2006

  • MacKay DM (1967) Freedom of action in a mechanistic universe. Cambridge

  • Matthias A (2004) The responsibility gap: ascribing responsibility for the actions of learbing automata. Ethics Inf Technol 6:S175–S183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mjolsness E, DeCoste D (2001) Machine learning for science: state of the art and future prospects. Science 293:S2051–S2055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rammert W (2002) Verteilte Intelligenz im Verkehrssystem. Interaktivitäten zwischen Fahrer, Fahrzeug und Umwelt. In: Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb. 97/7–8:S404–S408

  • Riken (2007) RI-MAN. Riken-Biomimetic Control Research Center. www.bmc.riken.jp/∼RI-MAN/index_us.html. Aufruf am 26.3.2007

  • Schlegel T (2007) Robotik: Unsere Krankenschwester ist ein Roboter. In: Wissenschaft-Wirtschaft-Politik Jg. 37, Nr.6, S. 4–5

  • Schlegel T, Thiel S (2007) Die elektronischen Krankenschwestern. IAO-news, February 2007

  • Schmidt CTA, Krämer F (2006) Robots, Dennet and the autonomous: a terminological investigation. Mind Mach 16:73–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz U (2007) Kommentar: Senioren, geborgen in Sensoren? Wissenschaft-Wirtschaft-Politik Jg. 31 Nr.8, S. 1

  • Seelisch F (2007) Fraunhofer IESE führt europäisches Lebensassistenz-Konsortium an. Pressemitteilung, IESE, 19.02.2007

  • Shastri L (2007) A neural architecture for reasoning, decision-making, and episodic memory: taking a cue from the brain. In: Garces AS, Hitzler P, Tamburrini G (eds) Proceedings of the 3rd International workshop on neural-symbolic learning and reasoning, NeSy’07, held at IJCAI-07, Hyderabad, India

  • Timpe K-P, Jürgensohn T, Kolrep H (2002) Mensch-Maschine-Systemtechnik. Konzepte, Modellierung, Gestaltung, Evaluation. Symposion, Düsseldorf

  • Trevelyan J (1999) Redefining robotics for the new millennium. Int J Robotic Res 18(12):1211–1223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VDI-Richtlinie 2860 (1990) Handhabungsfunktionen, Handhabungseinrichtungen, Begriffe, Definitionen, Symbole. Düsseldorf

  • Weng J, McClelland J, Pentland A, Sporns O, Stockman I, Sur M, Thelen E (2001) Artificial intelligence: autonomous mental development by robots and animals. Science 91:S599–S600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weyer J (2006) Die Kooperation menschlicher Akteure und nicht-menschlicher Agenten. Ansatzpunkte einer soziologischen Soziologie hybrider Systeme. Soziologische Arbeitspapiere Nr. 16, Universität Dortmund

  • WHO (2006) Working together for health. The world health report. World Health Organization

  • XPERO (2006) XPERO: Roboter lernen durch Spielen. Presseerklärung Fachhochschule Bonn-Rhein-Sieg vom 20. Juni 2006, Sankt Augustin

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ITAS, Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis, Research Centre Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany

    Michael Decker

Authors
  1. Michael Decker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Decker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Decker, M. Caregiving robots and ethical reflection: the perspective of interdisciplinary technology assessment. AI & Soc 22, 315–330 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-007-0151-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-007-0151-0

Keywords