Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Nature and roles for community networks in the information society

  • Original Article
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper draws on the authors more than 10 years of involvement in the action research experience of the Milan Community Network. It discusses the roles that community networks play in the Information Society: starting from a neat characterization of “online community”, community networks are presented as ICT learning communities, as local online communities and as complementary to Digital Cities. Finally, critical insights into institutional aspects of community networks are considered from the perspective of their sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Although we prefer the term network society (see Castell 1996) to emphasize the role the net plays in shaping the society nowadays, in this paper we use the term Information Society which is the expression adopted by the European Union and several other international bodies, including the United Nations (e.g., within the WSIS, the World Summit on the Information Society).

  2. www.retecivica.milano.it.

  3. Actually:

    • the core attributes number 1, 2 and the non-core attributes number 1 can be grouped in point 1 (to notice that core attribute number 2 is less stringent here)

    • the core attributes number 4 can be grouped in point 2;

    • the core attributes number 3, 5 and the non-core attributes number 2, 3, 5 can be grouped in point 3;

    • point 4 introduces the technological infrastructure;

    • the possible controversial non-core attributes number 4, 6, 7 are not explicitly mentioned.

  4. From a post by Steve Cisler within the GCNP (Global Community Networking Partnership) mailinglist.

  5. Unfortunately, KMS (knowledge Management Systems) are still very expensive and, because of this, generally out of reach for a CN.

  6. Worldwide examples of CNs rooted into dispersed areas are: the initiatives of several rural Indian regions (see Blattman et al. 2003), Austin Freenet (www.austinfrre.net)—Texas is the second USA rural region, after Alaska—OYK—North Karelia community network (www.oyk.fi) in Finland, and—in Italy—VOLI (the Comunità Montana della Valcamonica network).

  7. We are not saying that online discussions can substitute face-to-face meetings: we have simply observed that, while the traditional socialization places (including bars, trade unions, etc.) loose part of their role due to the changes in people working lifes, the net in general, and a community network locally rooted in particular, can offer a (partial) alternative to the loss of socialization places.

  8. We use here the term Digital Cities as a synonym of the city web site, in the same way as it has been used in the yearly Survey made by CENSIS—the most important Italian social survey body (see, for instance RUR, DFP, Formez and Censis 2003).

  9. All these possibilities for the public sector are reported in a document presented in 2000 by the President of Young Entrepreneurs (see: Garrone 2000).

  10. (Schuler 1996) discusses several organizational alternatives putting them in relationship with alternative funding policies.

  11. In 2007 the citizens participants were about one hundred, schools members were six and non profit association were nine.

  12. This shift from local to global can of course be motivated and defended on the basis of considerations about the world globalization. However, it is our opinion that this often hides the difficulties encountered in managing Community Networks and guaranteeing their sustainability.

References

  • Allee V (2000) Knowledge networks and communities of practice, OD practitioner. J Org Develop Netw 32:4

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellezza E, Florian F (2001) Le Fondazioni del Terzo Millennio: Pubblico e Provato per il non-profit, Passigli Editori. Firenze (I), (in Italian)

  • Benassi M, De Cindio F, Ripamonti LA (2003) Network of small firms and the web: looking for a trustworthy architect. In: Proceedings of IBIMA—international business information management conference, Cairo Egypt, 16–18 December 2003

  • Benassi M, De Cindio F, Ripamonti LA (2004) Online communities sustainability: some economic issue. In: Proceedings of CIRN 2004: sustainability and community technology, Monash University, Prato, 29 September–1 October 2004

  • Beniger J (1987) Personalization of mass media and the growth of pseudo-community. Commun Res 14(3):352–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blattman C, Jensen R, Roman R (2003) Assessing the need and potential of community networking for development in rural India. In: Sawhney H (ed) Special Issue ICTs and Community Networking, The Information Society International Journal 19(5): 395–406

  • Blomberg J, Kensing F (1998) Participatory design: issues and concerns. Special Issue on Participatory Design, Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing 7(3–4): 167–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Briefs U, Ciborra C, Schneider L (eds) (1983) Systems design for, with, and by the users. In: Proceedings of the IFIP WG 9.1 working conference on systems design for, with, and by the users, Riva De Sole, Italy, 20–24 Sep 1982. North-Holland, Amsterdam, Oxford

  • Broussard M (2000) Sperimentazione di un motore di ricerca per informazioni non strutturate, in grado di categorizzare testi in linguaggio naturale, applicato alla Rete Civica di Milano. Degree Thesis in Scienze dell’Informazione—DSI—Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy

  • Carroll JM, Rosson MB (2003) A trajectory for community networks. In Sawhney H (ed) Special Issue ICTs and Community Networking, The Information Society International Journal 19(5): 395–406

  • Casapulla G, De Cindio F, Gentile O, Sonnante L (1998) A citizen-driven civic network as stimulating context for designing on-line public services. In: Proceedings of the fifth participatory design conference “Broadening Participation”, Seattle, WA USA, November 1998

  • Casapulla G, De Cindio F, Ripamonti LA (2000) Community networks and access for all in the era of the free intenet: “Discover the treasure” of the community. In: Keeble L, Loader BD (eds) Community informatics: shaping computer-mediated social relations. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Castell M (1996) The rise of the network society. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford (UK)

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement A, Shade LR (2000) The access rainbow: conceptualizating universal access to the information/communications infrastructure. In: Gurstein M (ed) Community informatics: enabling communities with information and communications technologies. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughlan P, Coghlan D (2002) Action research for operations management. Int J Oper Prod Manage 22(2):220–240 Emerald

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Cindio F (2002) Biblioteche e reti civiche: quando la comunicazione diventa interattiva. In: Foglieni O (ed) Comunicare la biblioteca, Editrice Bibliografica, Milano, Italy (in Italian)

  • De Cindio F (2004) The role of community networks in shaping the network society: enabling people to develop their own projects. In: Schuler D, Day P (eds) Shaping the network society. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • De Cindio F, Gentile O, Grew P, Redolfi D (2003) Community Networks: Rules of Behavior and Social Structure. In: Venkatesh M (ed) Special Issue “ICTs and Community Networking”, The Information Society International Journal 19(5): 395–406

  • De Cindio F, De Pietro L, Freschi AC (eds) (2004) E-democracy: modelli e strumenti delle forme di partecipazione emergenti nel panorama italiano. FORMEZ—Progetto CRC (in Italian)

  • De Cindio F, Peraboni C, Ripamonti LA (2007) Community Networks as lead users in online public services design. In: Journal of Community Informatics, Special Issue: Community Informatics and System Design 3(1)

  • Garrone E (2000) Dalla new economy alla new society—Miti e realtà di una rivoluzione in corso. In: proceedings of Confindustria Meeting, Santa Margherita Ligure, Italy, 9–10 June 2000

  • Giddens A (1999) Runaway world. How globalization is reshaping our lives. Profile Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones S (1997) The internet and its social landscape. In: Jones S (ed) Virtual culture: identity and communication in cybersociety. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Journal of Community Informatics (2005) Sustainability and community ICTs, 1,2. Available at http://www.ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/issue/view/11

  • Kim AJ (2000) Community building on the web. Peachpit Press, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy P (1995) Quest-ce que le virtuel. La Dècouverte, Paris

  • Luisi P (2001) Tre buoni motivi per considerare finita la rete civica (così come l’abbiamo sempre conosciuta). In: Le reti civiche in Italia. Punto e a capo, Quaderni di Comunicazione Pubblica, CLUEB, Bologna (I) (in Italian)

  • McArthur R, Bruza P (2003) Discovery of implicit and explicit connections between people using email utterance. In: Proceedings of the eight European conference on computer supported cooperative work—ECSCW 2003, Helsinki, Finland, 14–18 September 2003

  • Miani M (2002) The institutionalization of civic network: the case of italian digital cities. Presented at the Euricom Colloquium “Electronic Networks & Democracy”, University of Nijmegen (NL), October 2002. Available at http://oase.uci.kun.nl/~jankow/Euricom/papers/Miani.pdf

  • Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The knowledge-creating company. Oxford University Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldenburg R (1989) The great good place: cafes, coffee shops, community centers, beauty parlors, general stores, bars, hangouts and how they get you through the day. Paragon House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Preece J (2000) Online communities: designing usability, supporting sociability. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason P, Bradbury H (2001) Handbook of action research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheingold H (1993) The virtual community: homesteading on the electronic frontier. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheingold H (1994) A slice of my life in my virtual community. In: Harasim LM (ed) Global networks: computer and international communication. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripamonti LA (2003) Online communities for knowledge sharing in SMEs. Ph.D. thesis in Informatics, D.I.Co. University of Milano, Italy

  • RUR, DFP, Formez, Censis (2003) VII Rapporto sulle Città Digitali (2002). Roma, Italy

  • Schuler D (1996) New community networks: wired for change, Addison-Wesley. Available at the URL http://www.scn.org/ncn/

  • Schuler D (2000) New communities and new community networks. In: Gurstein M (ed) Community informatics: enabling communities with information and communications technologies. Idea Publ. Group, Hershey, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuler D (2001) Cultivating society’s civic intelligence: patterns for a new ‘world brain’. J Inf Commun Soc 4(2):157–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuler D, Namioka A (eds) (1993) Participatory design: principles and practices. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Toennis F (1887) Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft. Leipzig

  • Wellman B (1982) Studying personal communities. In: Lin PMN (ed) Social structure and network analysis. Sage, Beverly Hills

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger E (1998) Communities of practice—learning as a social system. Systems Thinker, June 1998

  • Wenger E, Snyder WM (2000) Learning in communities, LINE Zine (www.linezine.com)

  • Wenger E, McDermott R, Snyder WM (2002) Cultivating communities of practice—a guide to managing knowledge. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Westbrook R (1995) Action research, a new paradigm for research in production and operations management. Int J Oper Prod Manage 15(12):6–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker S, Issac E, O’Day V (1997) Widening the net. Workshop report on the theory and practice of physical and network communities. SIGCHI Bull 29(3):27–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilbur S (1997) An archaeology of cyberspace. virtuality, community, identity. In: Porter D (ed) Internet culture. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the community members who collaborated in redefining the RCM mission and the RCM staff who supported our work with their tenacious, continuous and indefatigable efforts. We also want to thank the editor of this issue and Doug Schuler for their comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fiorella de Cindio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Cindio, F., Ripamonti, L.A. Nature and roles for community networks in the information society. AI & Soc 25, 265–278 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-009-0261-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-009-0261-y

Keywords

Navigation