Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Engineering sustainable mHealth: the role of Action Research

  • Original Article
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present paper aims to review the value of Action Research (AR) in the evolution of sustainable mHealth. On the one hand, mHealth is a medically and economically massively expanding domain. On the other hand, the mHealth development suffers from a serious lack of sustainability, which has become particularly evident through the concept of “pilotitis.” The proposed methodological remedy shows a high congruence to the principle of AR. A quantitative and qualitative literature research is performed. Each result from the qualitative literature research is analyzed with regard to aim, main focuses of AR methodology, study results and AR contribution to mHealth development. The principles of AR with regard to mHealth development are described, showing a strong connection between corresponding methodology and effects in health care. We analyze the quantitative contribution of AR to health care in general and show the typical phases of AR healthcare implementation. Furthermore, a quantitative literature research reveals that AR contributes to 6 % of mHealth publications. Our qualitative literature research discovers 27 studies dealing with AR contributions (54 % direct, 46 % methodological) to mHealth. Main subjects of the direct contributions are Health Information Systems (38 %), Surgery (23 %), Conservative/internal medicine (15 %), Self-help (15 %) and Medical Education (8 %). In summary, our review shows that AR contributes qualitatively and quantitatively to the mHealth development and that AR has a special potential to generate sustainable mHealth solutions.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aanestad M, Joliffe B, Mukherjee A, Sahay S (2014) Infrastructuring work: building a State-Wide Hospital information infrastructure in india information systems research online publication 17 November. doi:10.1287/isre.2014.0557

  • Ahari SS, Habibzadeh S, Yousefi M, Amani F, Abdi R (2012) Community based needs assessment in an urban area: a participatory action research project. BMC Publ Health 12(1):161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50(2):179–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asangansi I, Braa K (2010) The emergence of mobile-supported national health information systems in developing countries. Stud Health Technol Inform 160(Pt 1):540–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Baskerville RL (1999) Investigating information systems with action research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 2, Article 19

  • Beijma H (2011) Pilotitis, the biggest disease in mhealth. http://de.slideshare.net/texttochange/pilotitis-the-biggest-disease-in-mhealth. Accessed 31 Mar 2015

  • Braa K, Sanner T (2011) Making mHealth happen for health information systems in low resource contexts. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Social Implications of Computers in Developing Countries, Kathmandu, Nepal: 530–541

  • Braa K, Monteiro E, Sahay S (2004) Networks of action: sustainable health information systems across developing countries. MIS Q 28(3):337–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Braa K, Hanseth O, Heywood A, Mohammed W, Shaw V (2007) Developing health information systems in developing countries: the flexible standards strategy. MIS Q 31(August):1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Braa K, Heywood A, Sahay S (2012) Improving quality and use of data through data-use workshops: Zanzibar, United Republic of Tanzania. Bull World Health Organ 90(5):379–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlozzi NE, Tulsky DS, Kisala PA (2011) Traumatic brain injury patient-reported outcome measure: identification of health-related quality-of-life issues relevant to individuals with traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 92(10 Suppl):S52–S60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaiyachati KH, Loveday M, Lorenz S, Lesh N, Larkan L-M, Cinti S, Friedland GH, Haberer JE (2013) A pilot study of an mHealth application for healthcare workers: poor uptake despite high reported acceptability at a rural South African community-based MDR-TB treatment program. PLoS ONE 8(5):e64662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charupash R, Taksinajenkit K, Somjaipen S (2010) Applying the sufficient economical theory in personal money planning: a class room action research at Sirindhron Public Health College Khon Kaen Province, Thailand. Proc Soc Behav Sci 2(2):3792–3795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P, Holwell S (2007) Action Research. In: Kock N (ed) Information systems action research. Springer, Boston, pp 3–17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chiasson M, Reddy M, Kaplan B, Davidson E (2007) Expanding multi-disciplinary approaches to healthcare information technologies: what does information systems offer medical informatics? Int J Med Inf 76(Suppl 1):89–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cintra RF, Vieira SFA, Hall RJ, Fernandes CR (2013) Information from the invoicing sector as support for decision-making: a case study at the University Hospital of the Federal University of Grande Dourados (UFGD). Ciência and saúde coletiva 18(10):3043–3053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courtney-Pratt H, Cummings E, TurnerP Cameron-Tucker H, Wood-Baker R, Walters EH, Robinson AL (2012) Entering a world of uncertainty: community nurses’ engagement with information and communication technology. Comput Inf Nurs: CIN 30(11):612–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuisance D, Rioux J-A (2004) Current status of medical and veterinary entomology in France: endangered discipline or promising science? Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 27(5):377–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davison R, Martinsons MG, Kock N (2004) Principles of canonical action research. Inf Syst J 14(1):65–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delf P (2013) Designing effective eLearning for healthcare professionals. Radiography 19(4):315–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Divakaran PKP (2013) Pre-release member participation as potential predictors of post-release community members’ adoption behaviour: evidence from the motion picture industry. Behav Inf Technol 32(6):545–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehde DM, Wegener ST, Williams RM, Ephraim PL, Stevenson JE, Isenberg PJ, Mackenzie EJ (2013) Developing, testing, and sustaining rehabilitation interventions via participatory action research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 94(1 Suppl):S30–S42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekberg J, Gursky EA, Timpka T (2013) Pre-launch evaluation checklist for online health-promoting communities. J Biomed Inf Online Publ. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2013.10.004

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiordelli M, Diviani N, Schulz PJ (2013) Mapping mHealth research: a decade of evolution. J Med Internet Res 15(5):e95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallberg N, Timpka T, Eriksson H (1999) The medical software quality deployment method. Methods Inf Med 38(1):66–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson BD (1970) The product portfolio. http://www.bcg.de/documents/file52312.pdf. Accessed 31 Mar 2015

  • Ho K, Marsden J, Jarvis-Selinger S, Novak Lauscher H, Kamal N, Stenstrom R, Sweet D, Goldman RD, Innes G (2012) A collaborative quality improvement model and electronic community of practice to support sepsis management in emergency departments: investigating care harmonization for provincial knowledge translation. JMIR Res Protoc 1(2):e6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen J, Hale L, Mirfin-Veitch B, Harland T (2013) Building the research capacity of clinical physical therapists using a participatory action research approach. Phys Ther 93(7):923–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jinks C, Ong BN, O’Neill TJ (2009) The Keele community knee pain forum: action research to engage with stakeholders about the prevention of knee pain and disability. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 10:85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonker J, Pennink B (2009) The essence of research methodology. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Joyner K, Mash B (2012) A comprehensive model for intimate partner violence in South African primary care: action research. BMC Health Serv Res 12(1):399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Källander K, Tibenderana JK, Akpogheneta OJ, Strachan DL, Hill Z, Ten Asbroek AHA, Conteh L, Kirkwood BR, Meek SR (2013) Mobile health (mHealth) approaches and lessons for increased performance and retention of community health workers in low- and middle-income countries: a review. J Med Internet Res 15(1):e17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanfer FH, Reinecker H, Schmelzer D (2012) Selbstmanagement-therapie, 5th edn. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kant I (1986) Kritik der reinen Vernunft (1st edition in 1781). Reclam Verlag, Ditzingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimaro HC, Twaakyondo HM (2005) Analysing the hindrance to the use of information and technology for improving efficiency of health care delivery system in Tanzania. Tanzania Health Res Bull 7(3):189–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohli R, Hoadley ED (2007) Healthcare: fertile ground for action research. In: Kock N (ed) Information systems action research. Boston, Massachusetts, Springer science and Business Media, pp 241–254

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kohli R, Kettinger WJ (2004) Informating the clan: controlling physicians’ costs and outcomes. MIS Q 28(3):363–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotter J (1996) Leading change. Harvard Business Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuipers P, Humphreys JS, Wakerman J, Wells R, Jones J, Entwistle P (2008) Collaborative review of pilot projects to inform policy: a methodological remedy for pilotitis? Aust New Zealand Health Policy 5(1):17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyhlbäck H, Sutter B (2007) What does it take to replace an old functioning information system with a new one? A case study. Int J Med Inform 76(Suppl 1):S149–S158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lalonde L, Goudreau J, Hudon É, Lussier M-T, Duhamel F, Bélanger D, Lévesque L, Martin É (2012) Priorities for action to improve cardiovascular preventive care of patients with multimorbid conditions in primary care–a participatory action research project. Fam Pract 29(6):733–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemaire JL (2011) Scaling up mobile health elements necessary for the mHealth in developing countries. http://www.adaorganization.net/uploads/2/3/7/1/23713723/scaling_up_mobile_health_elements_necessary_for_the_successful_scale_up_of_mhealth_in_developing_countries.pdf. Accessed 31 Mar 2015

  • Lewin K (1948) Action research and minority problems. In: Lewin GW (ed) Resolving social conflicts. Harper, New York, pp 34–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Menschner P, Leimeister JM (2012) Devising a method for developing knowledge-intense, person-oriented services—results from early evaluation. 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). Maui, USA, pp 1502–1511

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer J (2000) Qualitative research in health care. Using qualitative methods in health related action research. BMJ 320(7228):178–181 (Clinical research ed.)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olvingson C, Hallberg N, Timpka T, Lindqvist K (2002) Requirements engineering for inter-organizational health information systems with functions for spatial analyses: modeling a WHO safe community applying use case maps. Methods Inf Med 41(4):299–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters M, Robinson V (1984) The Origins and Status of Action Research. J Appl Behav Sci 20(2):113–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrocelli J (2002) Processes and stages of change: counseling with the transtheoretical model of change. J Couns Dev 80:22–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilemalm S, Timpka T (2008) Third generation participatory design in health informatics–making user participation applicable to large-scale information system projects. J Biomed Inform 41(2):327–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puri SK, Sahay S, Lewis J (2009) Building participatory HIS networks: a case study from Kerala, India. Inf Organ 19(2):63–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purkayastha S, Manda TD, Sanner TA (2013) A post-development perspective on mhealth—an implementation initiative in malawi. 46th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS). Maui, USA, pp 4217–4225

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson JM (1995) Principals’ partnerships: an action research study on the professional development of New Zealand school leaders. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Waikato, Hamilton

  • Robertson J (2000) The three Rs of action research methodology: reciprocity, reflexivity and reflection-on-reality. Educ Act Res 8(2):307–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudtanasudjatum K (2008) Road traffic accidents management model: The successful application of stakeholder involvement in Chon Buri, Thailand. In 2008 8th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications, pp 195–198

  • Sanner TA, Roland LK, Braa K (2012) From pilot to scale: towards an mHealth typology for low-resource contexts. Health Policy Technol 1(3):155–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahar S, Adznam SN, Rahman SA, Yusoff NAM, Yassin Z, Arshad F, Sakian NIM, Salleh M, Samah AA (2012) Development and analysis of acceptance of a nutrition education package among a rural elderly population: an action research study. BMC Geriatr 12(1):24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner H, Maley O, Norman CD (2006) Developing internet-based eHealth promotion programs: the Spiral Technology Action Research (STAR) model. Health Promot Pract 7(4):406–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon BS, Duce D, Harrison R, Boness K (2012) Modeling social media collaborative work. In 2012 4th International Workshop on Modeling in Software Engineering (MISE), pp 43–49

  • Stringer ET (2013) Action Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Susman G, Evered RD (1978) An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Adm Sci Q 23(4):582–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanasugarn C, Thongbunjob K (2012) Human capital identification process: linkage for family medicine and community medicine to mobilize the community. J Med Assoc Thai Chotmaihet Thangphaet 95(Suppl 6):S94–S101

    Google Scholar 

  • Terazzi A, Giordano A, Minuco G (1997) An example of usability measurement in clinical software procedures. Stud Health Technol Inform 43(B):736–740

    Google Scholar 

  • Terazzi A, Giordano A, Minuco G (1998) How can usability measurement affect the re-engineering process of clinical software procedures? Int J Med Inform 52(1–3):229–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson MP (2002) Cultivating meaning: interpretive fine-tuning of a South African health information system. Inf Organ 12(3):183–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson M, Rotheram-Borus MJ, Swartz L, Tsai AC (2013) Scaling up mHealth: where is the evidence? PLoS Med 10(2):e1001382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waterman H, Tillen D, Dickson R, De Koning K (2001) Action research: a systematic review and guidance for assessment. Health Technol Assessment 5(23): iii–157

  • Weick KE, Quinn RE (1999) Organizational change and development. Annu Rev Psychol 50:361–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkelman WJ, Leonard KJ (2004) Overcoming structural constraints to patient utilization of electronic medical records: a critical review and proposal for an evaluation framework. J Am Med Inform Assoc JAMIA 11(2):151–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wise M, Pulvermacher A, Shanovich KK, Gustafson DH, Sorkness C, Bhattacharya A (2010) Using action research to implement an integrated pediatric asthma case management and eHealth intervention for low-income families. Health Promot Pract 11(6):798–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegenfuss JT (1987) Research information systems are path to high-quality healthcare. Health progress (Saint Louis, Mo.) 68(8): 50–3, 82

Download references

Author contributions

The present review is part of the PhD thesis of the first author. He introduced the original research idea into the research group, worked out the overview of AR, performed the qualitative and quantitative literature review and contributed decisively to the discussion. The other two authors acted as scientific supervisors, supplemented the literature selection with respect to the scholarly basket and revised the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Paracelsus-Wiehengebirgsklinik, Kokenrottstraße 71, 49152, Bad Essen, Germany

    Ulf Gerhardt

  2. Institute for eHealth and Management in Healthcare, University of Applied Sciences, Flensburg, Germany

    Rüdiger Breitschwerdt

  3. Information Management and Information Systems (IMWI), Osnabrueck University, Osnabrueck, Germany

    Ulf Gerhardt & Oliver Thomas

Authors
  1. Ulf Gerhardt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rüdiger Breitschwerdt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Oliver Thomas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulf Gerhardt.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gerhardt, U., Breitschwerdt, R. & Thomas, O. Engineering sustainable mHealth: the role of Action Research. AI & Soc 32, 339–357 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-015-0640-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-015-0640-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation