Abstract
Digital platforms like Facebook offer marginalized individuals an appealing opportunity: to connect with others like them on a global scale. Transgender and nonbinary individuals, for example, can join ‘support groups’. However, these individuals also risk being ‘outed’ or targeted with hate-speech on a platform that offers visibility and connection. Excellent scholarship has critiqued the ways platforms perpetuate inequalities. However, few have examined the labor of human administrators who build support groups for gender identity minorities, despite these inequalities. This article asks how admin labor processes, both tangible and emotional, expose the cost of constructing a community on Facebook. Using a queer studies lens, it explores how administrators construct felt-belonging, sustain support, and defend members from being outed or targeted. Vetting new members and moderating group content act as repetitive labor processes which reiterate shared cultural ideologies of the community. This research finds something paradoxical: the feeling of disappointment fuels administrators’ commitment to continue difficult emotional labor. Paying attention to labor, especially emotional labor, reveals new tools for theorizing digital subjects and digitally-mediated social life. These tools refocus scholarly attention on why users turn to digital spaces and the human cost of sustaining community processes online. The case of gender identity support groups reveal that emotion, particularly disappointment, serves as an important lens with which to critique the sort of community digital contexts can offer
“Normative conventions and our own creative repetitions are there along the way to help quell the panic we might feel at the prospect of becoming exhausted or dead before we can make sense of ourselves.”-Lauren Berlant, Cruel Optimism (2011) p.125
.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
A pseudonym is used to protect the identity of the admin and group.
References
Anderson BRG (1991) Imagined communities: reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism, 2nd edn. Verso, London
Berlant LG (2011) Cruel optimism. Duke University Press, Durham
Bourdieu P (1989) Social space and symbolic power. Sociol Theory 7(1):14–25. https://doi.org/10.2307/202060
Boyd DM, Ellison NB (2007) Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. J Comput Mediat Commun 13(1):210–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
Brubaker R (2016) Trans: gender and race in an age of unsettled identities. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Butler J (1988) Performative acts and gender constitution: an essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre J 40(4):519–531. https://doi.org/10.2307/3207893
Butler J (1990) Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge, New York
Cavalcante A (2016) ‘I Did It All Online:’ transgender identity and the management of everyday life. Crit Stud Media Commun 33(1):109–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2015.1129065
Chen GM (2015) Losing face on social media: threats to positive face lead to an indirect effect on retaliatory aggression through negative affect. Commun Res 42(6):819–838
Cho A (2018) Default publicness: queer youth of color, social media, and being outed by the machine. New Media Soc 20(9):3183–3200. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817744784
Clark-Parsons R (2018) Building a digital girl army: the cultivation of feminist safe spaces online. New Media Soc 20(6):2125–2144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817731919
Connell R (2009) Accountable conduct: ‘doing gender’ in transsexual and political retrospect. Gend Soc 23(1):104–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243208327175
Cooley CH (1902) Human nature and the social order. Transaction Publishers, Piscataway
Corbin J, Strauss A (2014) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks
Davis JL, Jurgenson N (2014) Context collapse: theorizing context collusions and collisions. Inf Commun Soc 17(4):476–485
DeVito MA, Walker AM, Birnholtz J (2018) ‘Too Gay for Facebook’: presenting LGBTQ+ identity throughout the personal social media ecosystem. Proc ACM Hum Comput Interact 44:1–44. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274313
DI Kramer A, Guillory JE, Hancock JT (2014) Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(24):8788–8790
Digeser P (1994) Performativity trouble: postmodern feminism and essential subjects. Polit Res Q 47(3):655–673. https://doi.org/10.2307/448847
Dunbar RIM, Arnaboldi V, Conti M, Passarella A (2015) The structure of online social networks mirrors those in the offline world. Social Netw 43:39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2015.04.005
Ellison NB, Steinfield C, Lampe C (2007) The benefits of facebook ‘friends:’ social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. J Comput Mediat Commun 12(4):1143–1168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
Erickson RJ (1993) Reconceptualizing family work: the effect of emotion work on perceptions of marital quality. J Marriage Fam 888–900
Erickson RJ (2005) Why emotion work matters: sex, gender, and the division of household labor. J Marriage Fam 67(2):337–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2005.00120.x
Fay M (2008) ‘Mobile belonging’: exploring transnational feminist theory and online connectivity. In: Uteng T, Cresswell T (eds) Gendered mobilities. Routledge, New York, pp 65–82
Felmlee D, Faris R (2016) Toxic ties: networks of friendship, dating, and cyber victimization. Soc Psychol Q 79(3):243–262
G.L.S.E.N (2013) Out online: the experiences of Lesbian. Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Youth on the Internet
Goffman E (1959) The presentation of self in everyday life. Anchor Doubleday, Garden City
Golder SA, Wilkinson DM, Huberman BA (2007) Rhythms of social interaction: messaging within a massive online network. In: Steinfield C, Pentland BT, Ackerman M, Contractor N (eds) Communities and technologies 2007. Springer, London
Goodings L, Locke A, Brown SD (2007) Social networking technology: place and identity in mediated communities. J Community Appl Soc Psychol 17(6):463–476. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.939
Hanckel B, Morris A (2014) Finding community and contesting heteronormativity: queer young people’s engagement in an australian online community. J Youth Stud 17(7):872–886. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2013.878792
Hanckel B, Vivienne S, Byron P, Robards B, Churchill B (2019) ‘That’s not necessarily for them’: LGBTIQ+ young people, social media platform affordances and identity curation. Media Cult Soc 41(8):1261–1278
Hochschild AR (1983) The managed heart : commercialization of human feeling. University of California Press, Berkeley
Hoffmann AL, Proferes N, Zimmer M (2018) ‘Making the world more open and connected’: Mark Zuckerberg and the discursive construction of Facebook and its users. New Media Soc 20(1):199–218
Jackson SJ, Bailey M, Welles BF (2018) # GirlsLikeUs: trans advocacy and community building online. New Media Soc 20(5):1868–1888
Kang C, Isaac M (2019) Zuckerberg says Facebook won’t police political speech. New York Times
Kozinets RV (2015) Netnography. The international encyclopedia of digital communication and society. Wiley, New York, pp 1–8
Lamont E (2015) The limited construction of an egalitarian masculinity: college-educated men’s dating and relationship narratives. Men Masc 18(3):271–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X14557495
Lamont E (2017) ‘We can write the scripts ourselves’: queer challenges to heteronormative courtship practices. Gend Soc 31(5):624–646. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243217723883
Lu W-H, Chang Y-P, Lin C-H, Yen C-F (2019) Negative Facebook experiences among Taiwanese gay and bisexual men in emerging adulthood: associations with traditional harassment victimization and quality of life. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 15:1163–1170. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S190878
MacAulay M, Moldes MD (2016) Queen don’t compute: reading and casting shade on facebook’s real names policy. Crit Stud Media Commun 33(1):6–22
Mead GH (1934) Mind, self and society. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Namaste Ki (1994) The politics of inside/out: queer theory, poststructuralism, and a sociological approach to sexuality. Sociol Theory 12(2):220–231. https://doi.org/10.2307/201866
Pfeffer CA (2014) ‘I don’t like passing as a straight woman’: queer negotiations of identity and social group membership. Am J Sociol 120(1):1–44. https://doi.org/10.1086/677197
Phelan S (2018) All the comforts of home: the genealogy of community. In: Revisioning the political: feminist reconstructions of tranditional concepts in western political theory. Routledge, London, pp 235–250
Pierotti RS, Lake M, Lewis C (2018) Equality on his terms: doing and undoing gender through men’s discussion groups. Gend Soc 32(4):540–562. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243218779779
Pruchniewska U (2019) ‘A group that’s just women for women’: feminist affordances of private Facebook groups for professionals. New Media Soc 21(6):1362–1379
Shaw F (2013) Still ‘Searching for Safety Online’: collective strategies and discursive resistance to trolling and harassment in a feminist network. Fibrecult J (22 2013: Trolls and The Negative Space of the Internet)
Strauss AL (1987) Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Tucker JA, Guess A, Barberá P, Vaccari C, Siegel A, Sanovich S, Stukal D, Nyhan B (2018) Social media, political polarization, and political disinformation: a review of the scientific literature. In: Political polarization, and political disinformation: a review of the scientific literature (March 19, 2018)
Ward J (2010) Gender labor: transmen, femmes, and collective work of transgression. Sexualities 13(2):236–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460709359114
Westbrook L, Schilt K (2014) Doing gender, determining gender: transgender people, gender panics, and the maintenance of the sex/gender/sexuality system. Gend Soc 28(1):32–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243213503203
Zuckerberg M (2017) Bringing the world closer together [Facebook Message]. https://www.facebook.com/notes/mark-zuckerberg/bringing-the-world-closer-together/10154944663901634/. Accessed 13 Nov 2019
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
AIS Volume: AIS special issue ‘Iteration as Persuasion in a Digital World’ (IPDW)-volume of to be allocated later.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith-Johnson, M. Labor for community on Facebook. AI & Soc 38, 2081–2092 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01108-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01108-6