Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Legal and ethical aspects of deploying artificial intelligence in climate-smart agriculture

  • Original Article
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to identify artificial intelligence (AI) technologies that are applied in climate-smart agricultural practices and address ethical concerns of deploying those technologies from legal perspectives. As climate-smart agricultural AI, the study considers those AI-based technologies that are used for precision agriculture, monitoring peat lands, deforestation tracking, and improved forest management. The study utilized a systematic literature review approach to identify and analyze AI technologies employed in climate-smart agriculture and associated ethical and legal concerns. The study findings indicate several ethical concerns for deploying AI in climate-smart agricultural practices pertaining to data inaccuracy, other technical errors based on wrong recommendations or wrongful acts, data ownership and intellectual property issues, and economic issues resulting in digital division and privacy and security related issues. In this study, the ethical concerns were further examined based on criminal law, tort law, privacy and data protection law, and intellectual property law. In this regard, the study finds that the current tort law pattern is more suitable than the criminal law pattern to address some major ethical concerns, such as data inaccuracy and other technical errors based on wrong recommendations or wrongful acts. Finally, the study recommends that at the global level, all countries need to fill up the current gap of international law on climate-smart agriculture through agreeing on a standard set of legal provisions and enhancing collaboration in innovation and deployment of climate-smart agricultural AI. It further recommends that at the local level, countries need to adopt suitable regulations addressing multi-stakeholders’ interests associated with the deployment of climate-smart agricultural AIs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alreshidi E (2019) Smart sustainable agriculture (SSA) solution underpinned by internet of things (IoT) and artificial intelligence (AI). Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl 10(3):93–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellagio Big Data Workshop Participants (2014) Big data and positive social change in the developing world: a white paper for practitioners and researchers. Oxford Internet Institute, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bix B (2010) ‘Legal Theory: Types and Purposes’, https://drsivalaw.wordpress.com/2010/03/21/legal-theory-types-and-purposes-brian-bix/. Last accessed on 4 Nov 2020

  • Britannica, Common law, https://www.britannica.com/topic/common-law. Last accessed on 11 Jan 2021

  • Burton SJ (2007) An introduction to law and legal reasoning, 3rd edn. Aspen Publishers, pp 181–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbonell IM (2016) The ethics of big data in big agriculture. Internet Policy Rev 5(1):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), opened for signature June 5, 1992, 1760 U.N.T.S. 79 (entered into force Dec. 1993)

  • Chui WH (ed) (2007) Research methods for law. Edinburg University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung CL, Huang KJ, Chen SY, Lai MH, Chen YC, Kuo YF (2016) Detecting Bakanae disease in rice seedlings by machine vision. Comput Electron Agric 121:404–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Civil Law Rules on Robotics, European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2017 with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015/2103(INL), (2018/C 252/25), https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52017IP0051&from=EN. Last accessed on 14 Apr 2021

  • Darr M (2014) Big Data—the Catalyst for a Transformation to Digital Agriculture. In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual Integrated Crop Management Conference

  • Dubayah RO, Drake JB (2000) Lidar remote sensing for forestry’ 88 journal of forestry. Oxford Academic

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahimi MA, Khoshtaghaza MH, Minaei S, Jamshidi B (2017) Vision-based pest detection based on SVM classification method. Comput Electron Agric 137:52–58

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2017 with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015/2103(INL), (2018/C 252/25), https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52017IP0051&from=EN. Accessed 14 April 2021

  • European Parliament Research Service (March 2020) ‘The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence: issues & Initiatives’, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2020/634452/EPRS_STU(2020)634452_EN.pdf. last accessed on 16 Jul 2020

  • FAO (2020) Agriculture and climate change—law and governance in support of climate smart agriculture and international climate change goals. FAO Legislative Studies No. 115. Rome.

  • Ferris JL (2017) Data privacy and protection in the agriculture industry: is federal regulation necessary. Minn JL Sci Tech 18(1):309–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Flannigan M, Krezek-Hanes C, Wotton M, Waddington M, Turetsky M, Benscoter B (2012) ‘Peatland fires and carbon emissions’ 50 Front Line Express, Canadian Forest Service—Great Lakes Forestry Centre, https://cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/pubwarehouse/pdfs/33351.pdf

  • Fleming A, Jakku E, Lim-Camacho L, Thorburn P (2018) Is big data for big farming or for everyone? Perceptions in the Australian grains industry. Agron Sustain Dev 38:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Environment Programme (2020) The State of the World’s Forests 2020: Forests, biodiversity and people (Rome)

  • Fox W, Bayat MS (2007) A guide to managing research. Juta Publications, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinblat GL, Uzal LC, Larese MG, Granitto PM (2016) Deep learning for plant identification using vein morphological patterns. Comput Electron Agric 127:418–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallevy G (2010) The criminal liability of artificial intelligence entities—from science fiction to legal social control. Akron Intellect Prop J 4(2):171–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson W, Heeks R (2020) Impact of ICTs-in-Agriculture on Rural Resilience in Developing Countries. Development Informatics Working Paper no. 84, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3517468 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3517468

  • Hao K (2018) What is machine learning? MIT Technology Review, https://www.technologyreview.com/2018/11/17/103781/what-is-machine-learning-we-drew-you-another-flowchart/. Last accessed on 15 Jul 2020

  • Hao K (2019) Here are 10 ways AI could help fight climate change. MIT Technology Review, https://www.technologyreview.com/2019/06/20/134864/ai-climate-change-machine-learning/. Last accessed on 15 Jul 2020

  • Houtman RM, Montgomery CA, Gagnon AR, Calkin DE, Dietterich TG, McGregor S, Crowley M (2013) Allowing a wildfire to burn: estimating the effect on future fire suppression costs. Int J Wild Land Fire 22(7):871–882

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In: Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Farahani E, Kadner S, Seyboth K, Adler A, Baum I, Brunner S, Eickemeier P, Kriemann B, Savolainen J, Schlomer S, von Stechow C, Zwickel T, Minx JC (eds) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA

  • Johann AL, Araújo AGD, Delalibera HC, Hirakawa AR (2016) Soil moisture modeling based on stochastic behavior of forces on a no-till chisel opener. Comput Electron Agric 121:420–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson v. State, 142 Ala. 70, 38 So. 182 (1904); People v. Monks, 133 Cal. App. 440, 24 P.2d 508 (Cal.App. 4 Dist.1933).

  • Khabsa M, Giles CL (2014) The number of scholarly documents on the public web. PLoS ONE 9(5):e93949. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kingston J (2016) Artificial Intelligence and Legal Liability. In: Brame M, Petridis M (eds) Research and development in intelligent systems XXXIII: incorporating applications and innovations in intelligent systems XXIV, Springer-Verlag, pp 269–279

  • Kosior K (2017) Agricultural education and extension in the age of big data. European Seminar on Extension and Education

  • Krijn P, Wolfert S, Verdouw C (2014) ‘How ICT is changing the nature of the farm: a research agenda on the economics of big data. In: 11th European IFSA Symposium, Farming Systems Facing Global Challenges: Capacities and Strategies, Proceedings, Berlin, Germany, 1–4 April 2014

  • Legal Dictionary, https://dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=2137. Last accessed on 14 Jul 2020

  • Legal Information Institute (1992) Tort. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/tort. Last accessed on 14 Jul 2020

  • Liakos KG, Busato P, Moshou D, Pearson S, Bochtis D (2018) Machine learning in agriculture: a review. Sensors (basel, Switzerland) 18:2674

    PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin P, Jenkins R, Abney K (2017) Robot ethics 2.0: from autonomous cars to artificial intelligence. Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu DL, Zeleke KT, Wang B, Macadam I, Scott F, Martin RJ (2017) Crop residue incorporation can mitigate negative climate change impacts on crop yield and improve water use efficiency in a semiarid environment. Eur J Agron 85:51–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2017.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maione C, Batista BL, Campiglia AD, Barbosa F, Barbosa RM (2016) Classification of geographic origin of rice by data mining and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Comput Electron Agric 121:101–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Marr B (2018) What is deep learning AI? A simple guide with 8 practical examples. Forbes, https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2018/10/01/what-is-deep-learning-ai-a-simple-guide-with-8-practical-examples/#40ac66f98d4b. Last accessed on 15 Jul 2020

  • Maxey v. United States, 30 App. D.C. 63 (App.D.C.1907); Commonwealth v. Hill, 11 Mass. 136 (1814); Michael, (1840) 2 Mood. 120, 169 E.R. 48

  • Mayer D, Warner D, Siedel GJ, Lieberman JK (2012) Introduction to the law of property, estate planning and insurance. Saylor Foundation, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehdizadeh S, Behmanesh J, Khalili K (2017) Using MARS, SVM, GEP and empirical equations for estimation of monthly mean reference evapotranspiration. Comput Electron Agric 139:103–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law (2016) Merriam-Webster, Massachusetts

  • Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6:e1000097

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery CA (2014) An agent and a consequence of land use change. The Oxford handbook of land economics. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Montoya JH, Tsai C, Vojvodic A, Nørskov JK (2015) The challenge of electrochemical ammonia synthesis: a new perspective on the role of nitrogen scaling relation’s. Chemsuschem 8(13):2180–2186

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morellos A, Pantazi XE, Moshou D, Alexandridis T, Whetton R, Tziotzios G, Wiebensohn J, Bill R, Mouazen AM (2018) Machine learning based prediction of soil total nitrogen, organic carbon and moisture content by using VIS-NIR spectroscopy. Biosyst Eng 152:104–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrisey v. State, 620 A.2d 207 (Del.1993); Conyers v. State, 367 Md. 571, 790 A.2d 15 (2002); State v. Fuller, 346 S.C. 477, 552 S.E.2d 282 (2001); Gallimore v. Commonwealth, 246 Va. 441, 436 S.E.2d 421 (1993)

  • Nahvi B, Habibi J, Mohammadi K, Shamshirband S, Al Razgan OS (2016) Using self-adaptive evolutionary algorithm to improve the performance of an extreme learning machine for estimating soil temperature. Comput Electron Agric 124:150–160

    Google Scholar 

  • NASA (2022) ‘Responding to Climate Change’, https://climate.nasa.gov/solutions/adaptation-mitigation/Negligence, https://saylordotorg.github.io/text_introduction-to-the-law-of-property-estate-planning-and-insurance/s10-03-negligence.html. Last accessed on 14 Apr 2021

  • USDA NASS (2014) 2012 Census of Agriculture Highlights: Farm Economics’, https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/Highlights/2014/Farm_Economics/Highlights_Farm_Economics.pdf. Last accessed on 25 Apr 2021

  • Nix S (2019) The debate over clear-cutting. Thought Co., https://www.thoughtco.com/clearcutting-the-debate-over-clearcutting1343027#:~:text=Clear%2Dcutting%20is%20a%20method,both%20private%20and%20public%20forests. Last accessed on 11 Jan 2021

  • Pantazi XE, Moshou D, Bravo C (2016) Active learning system for weed species recognition based on hyperspectral sensing. Biosyst Eng 146:193–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Pantazi XE, Tamouridou AA, Alexandridis TK, Lagopodi AL, Kashefi J, Moshou D (2017a) Evaluation of hierarchical self-organising maps for weed mapping using UAS multispectral imagery. Comput Electron Agric 139:224–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Pantazi XE, Tamouridou AA, Alexandridis TK, Lagopodi AL, Kontouris G, Moshou D (2017b) Detection of Silybum marianum infection with Microbotryum silybum using VNIR field spectroscopy. Comput Electron Agric 137:130–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Parish F, Sirin AA, Charman D, Joosten H, Minaeva TY, Silvius M (2008) Assessment on peatlands, biodiversity and climate change: main report. Global Environment Centre, Kuala Lumpur and Wetlands International, Wageningen

  • Pickering C, Byrne J (2014) The benefits of publishing systematic quantitative literature reviews for PhD candidates and other early-career researchers. High Educ Res Dev 33:534–548

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering C, Grignon J, Steven R, Guitart D, Byrne J (2015) Publishing not perishing: how research students transition from novice to knowledgeable using systematic quantitative literature reviews. Stud High Educ 40:1756–1769

    Google Scholar 

  • Raad N, Burke MI (2018) What are the most important factors for pedestrian level-of-service estimation? A systematic review of the literature. Transp Res Rec 2672:101–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramos PJ, Prieto FA, Montoya EC, Oliveros CE (2017) Automatic fruit count on coffee branches using computer vision. Comput Electron Agric. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.03.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Veiga P, Wheeler J, Louis V, Tansey K, Balzter H (2017) Quantifying forest biomass carbon stocks from space. Curr for Rep 3(1):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers N (2014) What is precision agriculture? sustainable america. https://sustainableamerica.org/blog/what-is-precision-agriculture/#:~:text=Precision%20agriculture%20seeks%20to%20use,using%20less%20to%20grow%20more. Accessed 11 Jan 2021

  • Rolnick D, Donti PL, Kaack LH, Kochanski K, Lacoste A, Sankaran K, Ross AS, Milojevic-Dupont N, Jaques N, Waldman-Brown A, Luccioni AS, Maharaj T, Sherwin ES, Mukkavilli SK, Kording KP, Gomes CP, Ng AY, Hassabis D, Platt JC, Creutzig F, Chayes J, Bengio Y (2019) Tackling climate change with machine learning. ArXiv abs/1906.05433 (2019): pages 31

  • Ryan M (2019) Ethics of using AI and big data in agriculture: the case of a large agriculture multinational. ORBIT J 2(2):1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta S, Lee WS (2014) Identification and determination of the number of immature green citrus fruit in a canopy under different ambient light conditions. Biosys Eng 117:51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2013.07.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma A, Vanjani P, Paliwal N, Basnayaka CMW, Jayakody DNK, Wang HC, Muthuchidambaranathan P (2020) Communication and networking technologies for UAVs: a survey. J Netw Comput Appl 168:102739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea TO (2019) ‘Developing the world’s first indicator of forest carbon stocks & emissions’ (2019) https://www.planet.com/pulse/developing-the-worlds-first-indicator-of-forestcarbon-stocks-emissions/. Last accessed 25 Apr 2021

  • Sukkarieh S (2017) Mobile on-farm digital technology for smallholder farmers. In: Proceedings of the Crawford Fund Annual Conference

  • Sykuta ME (2016) Big data in agriculture: property rights, privacy and competition in Ag data services. Int Food Agribus Manag Rev 19:57–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor L (2017) Safety in numbers? Group privacy and big data analytics in the developing world. In: Taylor L, van der Sloot B, Floridi L (eds) Group privacy: the challenges of new data technologies. Springer, pp 13–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor L, Broeders D (2015) In the name of development: power, profit and the datafication of the global south. Geoforum 64:229–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Uddin M (2011) Climate Change and Requirement of Transfer of Environmentally Sound Technology. Master Thesis, Department of Earth Science, Uppsala University, Sweden

  • Uddin M (2020) Arguments for using AI to combat climate change. The Daily Star, https://www.thedailystar.net/opinion/environment/news/arguments-using-ai-combat-climate-change-1851343. Last accessed on 12 Jul 2020

  • Uddin M (2021) Climate change law, technology transfer, and sustainable development. Routledge, London, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Uddin M, Huq S (2020) Protecting soft adaptation technologies under intellectual property rights systems. Intell Prop Technol Law J 25(1):19–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Uddin M, Karim S (2020) International law and south-south cooperation for innovation and transfer of green technologies. George Wash Int Law Rev 52(3):355–392

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA) (2008) ‘Climate Change: Technology Development and Technology Transfer’, ( Prepared for the Beijing High-level Conference on Climate Change: Technology Development and Technology Transfer Beijing, China 7–8 November 2008) , file:///C:/Users/Dr.%20U/Desktop/public-private%20role%20of%20technology%20developmet%20and%20technology%20transfer.pdf. last accessed on 12 Jul 2020

  • United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Pmbl., May 9, 1992, 1771 U.N.T.S. 107; Conference of the Parties’ Twenty-first Session, U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change, Paris Agreement, pmbl., U.N. Doc. FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1

  • Westerling ALR (2016) Increasing western US forest wildfire activity: sensitivity to changes in the timing of spring. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 371(1696):20150178

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman L, Sanderson JC, Zhang A, Jakku E (2019) Farmers and their data: an examination of farmers’ reluctance to share their data through the lens of the laws impacting smart farming. Njas-Wageningen J Life Sci 90–91:100301

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2021) Climate-Smart Agriculture. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/climate-smart-agriculture. Last accessed on 10 Jan 2021

  • Zhang H, Wei X, Zou T, Li Z, Yang G (2014) Agriculture big data: research status, challenges and countermeasures. In: 8th International Conference on Computer and Computing Technologies in Agriculture (CCTA), Beijing, China, pp 137–143

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first and second author like to acknowledge the Centre for Advancing Responsible and Ethical Artificial Intelligence (CARE-AI) of the University of Guelph, Canada, for the seed funding, which helped to write this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada

    Mahatab Uddin & Ataharul Chowdhury

  2. University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

    Mahatab Uddin

  3. School of Computing, Mathematics and Engineering, Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, NSW, Australia

    Muhammad Ashad Kabir

Authors
  1. Mahatab Uddin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ataharul Chowdhury
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Muhammad Ashad Kabir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahatab Uddin.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Uddin, M., Chowdhury, A. & Kabir, M.A. Legal and ethical aspects of deploying artificial intelligence in climate-smart agriculture. AI & Soc 39, 221–234 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01421-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01421-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation