Abstract
The purpose of this research is to explore the acceptance of social robots as companions. Understanding what affects the acceptance of humanoid companions may give society tools that will help people overcome loneliness throughout pandemics, such as COVID-19 and beyond. Based on regulatory focus theory, it is proposed that there is a relationship between goal-directed motivation and acceptance of robots as companions. The theory of regulatory focus posits that goal-directed behavior is regulated by two motivational systems—promotion and prevention. People with a promotion focus are concerned about accomplishments, are sensitive to the presence and absence of positive outcomes (gains/non-gains), and have a strategic preference for eager means of goal-pursuit. People with a prevention focus are concerned about security and safety, are sensitive to the absence and presence of negative outcomes (non-losses/losses), and have a strategic preference for vigilant means. Two studies support the notion of a relationship between acceptance of robots as companions and regulatory focus. In Study 1, chronic promotion focus was associated with acceptance of robots, and this association was mediated by loneliness. The weaker the promotion focus, the stronger was the sense of loneliness, and thus the higher was the acceptance of the robots. In Study 2, a situationally induced regulatory focus moderated the association between acceptance of robots and COVID-19 perceived severity. The higher the perceived severity of the disease, the higher was the willingness to accept the robots, and the effect was stronger for an induced prevention (vs. promotion) focus. Models of acceptance of robots are presented. Implications for well-being are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Data availability
The data sets generated during and/or analyzed during the current research are available from the author on reasonable request. I am the only author of this paper.
References
Aaker JL, Lee AY (2001) “I” seek pleasures and “We” avoid pains: the role of self-regulatory goals in information processing and persuasion. J Consum Res 28(1):33–49. https://doi.org/10.1086/321946
Boldero JM, Higgins ET (2011) Regulatory focus and political decision making: when people favor reform over the status quo. Polit Psychol 32(3):399–418. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00814.x
Broadbent E (2017) Interactions with robots: The truths we reveal about ourselves. Annu Rev Psychol 68:627–652. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-043958
Brooks SK, Webster RK, Smith LE, Woodland L, Wessely S, Greenberg N, Rubin GJ (2020) The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. The Lancet 395(10227):912–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8
Bu F, Steptoe A, Fancourt D (2020) Loneliness during a strict lockdown: trajectories and predictors during the COVID-19 pandemic in 38,217 United Kingdom adults. Soc Sci Med 265:113521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113521
Cacioppo JT, Cacioppo S (2018) The growing problem of loneliness. Lancet 391(10119):426. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30142-9
Chiu CJ, Hsieh S, Li CW (2021) Needs and preferences of middle-aged and older adults in Taiwan for companion robots and pets: survey study. J Med Int Res 23(6):e23471. https://doi.org/10.2196/23471
Cross SE, Hardin EH, Gercek-Swing B (2011) The what, how, why, and where of self-construal. Personal Psychol Rev 15(2):142–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310373752
Crowe E, Higgins ET (1997) Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 69(2):117–132. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.2675
Dawson JF (2014) Moderation in management research: what, why, when, and how. J Bus Psychol 29(1):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9308-7
de Lange AMG, Kaufmann T, Quintana DS, Winterton A, Andreassen OA, Westlye LT, Ebmeier KP (2021) Prominent health problems, socioeconomic deprivation, and higher brain age in lonely and isolated individuals: a population-based study. Behav Brain Res 414:113510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113510
de Souza Soares CG, Honorato EJS, Lemos SM (2021) Mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: an integrative review on the impacts of social distancing on the occurrence of anxiety and depression symptoms. Int J Innov Edu Res 9(8):113–146. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol9.iss8.3269
Deutrom J, Katos V, Ali R (2021) Loneliness, life satisfaction, problematic internet use and security behaviours: re-examining the relationships when working from home during COVID-19. Behav Inform Technol. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2021.1973107
Dryhurst S, Schneider CR, Kerr J, Freeman AL, Recchia G, Van Der Bles AM, Van Der Linden S (2020) Risk perceptions of COVID-19 around the world. J Risk Res 23(7–8):994–1006. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2020.1758193
Fardghassemi S, Joffe H (2021) Young adults’ experience of loneliness in London’s most deprived areas. Frontiers Psychol 12:660791. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.660791
Fiedler K, Schott M, Meiser T (2011) What mediation analysis can (not) do. J Exp Soc Psychol 47(6):1231–1236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.007
Fiedler K, Harris C, Schott M (2018) Unwarranted inferences from statistical mediation tests—an analysis of articles published in 2015. J Exp Soc Psychol 75:95–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.11.008
Förster J, Higgins ET, Bianco AT (2003) Speed/accuracy decisions in task performance: built-in trade-off or separate strategic concerns? Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 90(1):148–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00509-5
Friedman RS, Förster J (2001) The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. J Pers Soc Psychol 81(6):1001–1013. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1001
Ghafurian M, Ellard C, Dautenhahn K (2021) Social companion robots to reduce isolation: a perception change due to COVID-19. In: Ardito C et al (eds) Human-Computer Interaction INTERACT 2021 Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Cham
Groarke JM, Berry E, Graham-Wisener L, McKenna-Plumley PE, McGlinchey E, Armour C (2020) Loneliness in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: cross-sectional results from the COVID-19 Psychological Wellbeing Study. PLoS ONE 15(9):e0239698. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239698
Grolli RE, Mingoti MED, Bertollo AG, Luzardo AR, Quevedo J, Réus GZ, Ignácio ZM (2021) Impact of COVID-19 in the mental health in elderly: psychological and biological updates. Mol Neurobiol 58(5):1905–1916. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-020-02249-x
Hamstra MRW, Bolderdijk JW, Veldstra JL (2011) Everyday risk taking as a function of regulatory focus. J Res Pers 45(1):134–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2010.11.017
Haug N, Geyrhofer L, Londei A, Dervic E, Desvars-Larrive A, Loreto V, Klimek P (2020) Ranking the effectiveness of worldwide COVID-19 government interventions. Nature Human Behav 4(12):1303–1312. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01009-0
Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT (2010) Loneliness matters: a theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med 40(2):218–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-010-9210-8
Henkel AP, Čaić M, Blaurock M, Okan M (2020) Robotic transformative service research: deploying social robots for consumer well-being during COVID-19 and beyond. J Serv Manag 31(6):1131–1148. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-05-2020-0145
Higgins ET, Friedman RS, Harlow RE, Idson LC, Ayduk ON, Taylor A (2001) Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: promotion pride versus prevention pride. Eur J Soc Psychol 31(1):3–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.27
Holt-Lunstad J (2017) The potential public health relevance of social isolation and loneliness: prevalence, epidemiology, and risk factors. Public Policy Aging Report 27(4):127–130. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppar/prx030
Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Layton JB (2010) Social relationships and mortality risk: a meta-analytic review. PLOS Med 7(7):e1000316. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316
Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Baker M, Harris T, Stephenson D (2015) Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: a meta-analytic review. Perspect Psychol Sci 10(2):227–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614568352
Hughes ME, Waite LJ, Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT (2004) A short scale for measuring loneliness in large surveys: results from two population-based studies. Res Aging 26(6):655–672. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027504268574
Idson LC, Liberman N, Higgins ET (2000) Distinguishing gains from nonlosses and losses from nongains: a regulatory focus perspective on hedonic intensity. J Exp Soc Psychol 36(3):252–274. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1999.1402
Kharroubi S, Saleh F (2020) Are lockdown measures effective against COVID-19? Frontiers Publ Health 8:549692. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.549692
Killgore WD, Cloonan SA, Taylor EC, Miller MA, Dailey NS (2020) Three months of loneliness during the COVID-19 lockdown. Psychiatry Res 293:113392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113392
Kwok KO, Lai FYL, Wei VWI, Tsoi MTF, Wong SYS, Tang JWT (2020) Comparing the impact of various interventions to control the spread of COVID-19 in twelve countries. J Hosp Infect 106(1):214–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2020.06.029
Lee AY, Aaker JL, Gardner WL (2000) The pleasures and pains of distinct self-construals: the role of interdependence in regulatory focus. J Pers Soc Psychol 78(6):1122–1134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.6.1122
Lee SL, Pearce E, Ajnakina O, Johnson S, Lewis G, Mann F, Lewis G (2021) The association between loneliness and depressive symptoms among adults aged 50 years and older: a 12-year population-based cohort study. Lancet Psychiatry 8(1):48–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30383-7
Liberman N, Idson LC, Camacho CJ, Higgins ET (1999) Promotion and prevention choices between stability and change. J Pers Soc Psychol 77(6):1135–1145. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1135
Liberman N, Molden DC, Idson LC, Higgins ET (2001) Promotion and prevention focus on alternative hypotheses: implications for attributional functions. J Pers Soc Psychol 80(1):5–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.1.5
Markus HR, Kitayama S (1991) Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychol Rev 98(2):224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
Novotný JS, Gonzalez-Rivas JP, Kunzová Š, Skladaná M, Pospíšilová A, Polcrová A, Stokin GB (2020) Risk factors underlying COVID-19 lockdown-induced mental distress. Frontiers Psychiatry 11:603014. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.603014
Odekerken-Schröder G, Mele C, Russo-Spena T, Mahr D, Ruggiero A (2020) Mitigating loneliness with companion robots in the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: an integrative framework and research agenda. J Serv Manag 31(6):1149–1162. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-05-2020-0148
Parlapani E, Holeva V, Nikopoulou VA, Sereslis K, Athanasiadou M, Godosidis A, Diakogiannis I (2020) Intolerance of uncertainty and loneliness in older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers Psychiatry 11:842. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00842
Perissinotto CM, Cenzer IS, Covinsky KE (2012) Loneliness in older persons: a predictor of functional decline and death. Arch Intern Med 172(14):1078–1084. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2012.1993
Petitte T, Mallow J, Barnes E, Petrone A, Barr T, Theeke L (2015) A systematic review of loneliness and common chronic physical conditions in adults. Open Psychol J 8(Suppl 2):113–132. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874350101508010113
Ross, G. M. 2021 I use a COVID-19 contact-tracing app Do you? Regulatory focus and the intention to engage with contact tracing technology. Journal of Information Management Data Insights. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2021.100045
Rubenowitz E, Waern M, Wilhelmson K, Allebeck P (2001) Life events and psychosocial factors in elderly suicides—a case-control study. Psychol Med 31(7):1193–1202. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291701004457
Sarrica M, Brondi S, Fortunati L (2019) How many facets does a “social robot” have? A review of scientific and popular definitions online. Inf Technol People 33(1):1–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-04-2018-0203
Scholer AA, Cornwell JF, Higgins ET (2019) Regulatory focus theory and research: catching up and looking forward after 20 years. In: Ryan RM (ed) The Oxford Handbook of Human Motivation. Oxford University Press, New York
Seifert A, Hassler B (2020) Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on loneliness among older adults. Frontiers Sociol 5:590935. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2020.590935
Sha S, Xu Y, Chen L (2020) Loneliness as a risk factor for frailty transition among older Chinese people. BMC Geriatr 20(1):300. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01714-5
Vaughn LA, Baumann J, Klemann C (2008) Openness to experience and regulatory focus: evidence of motivation from fit. J Res Pers 42(4):886–894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.11.008
Wigfield A, Turner R, Alden S, Green M, Karania VK (2020) Developing a new conceptual framework of meaningful interaction for understanding social isolation and loneliness. Soc Policy Soc. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147474642000055X
Wiktorsson S, Runeson B, Skoog I, Östling S, Waern M (2010) Attempted suicide in the elderly: characteristics of suicide attempters 70 years and older and a general population comparison group. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 18(1):57–67. https://doi.org/10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181bd1c13
Zou X, Scholer AA, Higgins ET (2014) In pursuit of progress: promotion motivation and risk preference in the domain of gains. J Pers Soc Psychol 106(2):183–201. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035391
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. I declare I have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Curmudgeon CornerCurmudgeon Corner is a short opinionated column on trends in technology, arts, science and society, commenting on issues of concern to the research community and wider society. Whilst the drive for super-human intelligence promotes potential benefits to wider society, it also raises deep concerns of existential risk, thereby highlighting the need for an ongoing conversation between technology and society. At the core of Curmudgeon concern is the question: What is it to be human in the age of the AI machine? -Editor.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
I declare I have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ross, G.M. Dancing with robots: acceptability of humanoid companions to reduce loneliness during COVID-19 (and beyond). AI & Soc 39, 2557–2568 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01738-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01738-6