Abstract
We consider a question of T. Jech and K. Prikry that asks if the existence of a precipitous filter implies the existence of a normal precipitous filter. The aim of this paper is to improve a result of Gitik (Israel J Math, 175:191–219, 2010) and to show that measurable cardinals of a higher order rather than just measurable cardinals are necessary in order to have a model with a precipitous filter but without a normal one.
We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.
References
Donder H.-D., Levinski J.-P.: Weakly precipitous filters. Israel J. Math. 67(2), 225–242 (1989)
Ferber A., Gitik M.: On almost precipitous ideals. Arch. Math. Logic 49, 301–328 (2010)
Gitik M.: On normal precipitous ideals. Israel J. Math 175, 191–219 (2010)
Jech T., Prikry K.: On ideals of sets and the power set operation. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 82(4), 593–595 (1976)
Mitchell W.: Applications of the covering lemma for sequences of measures. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 299(1), 41–58 (1987)
Mitchell, W.: Beginning inner model theory. Handb. Set Theory 3(17), 1449–1496 (Springer, 2009)
Mitchell, W.: The covering lemma. Handb. Set Theory 3(18), 1497–1594, (Springer, 2009)
Schimmerling E., Velickovic B.: Collapsing functions. Math. Logic Quart. 50, 3–8 (2004)
Zeman M.: Inner models and large cardinals, de Gruyter series in logic and its applications. Vol. 5, Walter de Gruyter & Co, Berlin (2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Moti Gitik—partly by ISF Grant 234/08.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gitik, M., Tal, L. On the strength of no normal precipitous filter. Arch. Math. Logic 50, 223–243 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-010-0211-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-010-0211-x