Skip to main content
Log in

Parameter cascades and profiling in functional data analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Computational Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A data smoothing method is described where the roughness penalty depends on a parameter that must be estimated from the data. Three levels of parameters are involved in this situation: Local parameters are the coefficients of the basis function expansion defining the smooth, global parameters define low-dimensional trend and the roughness penalty, and a complexity parameter controls the amount of roughness in the smooth. By defining local parameters as regularized functions of global parameters, and global parameters in turn as functions of complexity parameter, we define a parameter cascade, and show that the accompanying multi-criterion optimization problem leads to good estimates of all levels of parameters and their precisions. The approach is illustrated with real and simulated data, and this application is a prototype for a wide range of problems involving nuisance or local parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Efron B (2004) The estimation of prediction error: covariance penalties and cross-validation. J Am Stat Assoc 99:619–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green PJ, Silverman BW (1994) Nonparametric regression and generalized linear models: a roughness penalty approach. Chapman and Hall, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gu C (2002) Smoothing spline ANOVA models. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman N, Ramsay J (2000) Penalized regression with model based penalties. Can J Stat 28:241–258

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hung H, Wong W (1999) Averaging and profiling of likelihoods and the nuisance parameter problem. Technical report, Department of Statistics, Stanford University

  • Keilegom IV, Carroll RJ (2006) Backfitting versus profiling in general criterion functions. Statistica Sinica (submitted)

  • Murphy SA, van der Vaart AW (2000) On profile likelihood. J Am Stat Assoc 95:449–485

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Neyman J, Scott EL (1948) Consistent estimates based on partially consistent observations. Econometrika 16:1–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay JO, Silverman BW (2002) Functional data analysis, 1st edn. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay JO, Silverman BW (2005) Functional data analysis, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay JO, Hooker G, Campbell D, Cao J (2007) Estimating differential equations (with discussion). J R Stat Soc Ser B (in press)

  • Severini T, Staniswalis J (1994) Quasi-likelihood estimation in semiparametric models. J Am Stat Assoc 89:501–511

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Severini T, Wong WH (1992) Profile likelihood and conditionally parametric models. Ann Stat 20:1768–1802

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James O. Ramsay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cao, J., Ramsay, J.O. Parameter cascades and profiling in functional data analysis. Computational Statistics 22, 335–351 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-007-0044-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-007-0044-1

Keywords

Navigation