Skip to main content
Log in

Non-crossing quantile regression via doubly penalized kernel machine

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Computational Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quantile regression provides a more complete statistical analysis of the stochastic relationships among random variables. Sometimes quantile regression functions estimated at different orders can cross each other. We propose a new non-crossing quantile regression method using doubly penalized kernel machine (DPKM) which uses heteroscedastic location-scale model as basic model and estimates both location and scale functions simultaneously by kernel machines. The DPKM provides the satisfying solution to estimating non-crossing quantile regression functions when multiple quantiles for high-dimensional data are needed. We also present the model selection method that employs cross validation techniques for choosing the parameters which affect the performance of the DPKM. One real example and two synthetic examples are provided to show the usefulness of the DPKM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cawley GC, Talbot NLC, Foxall RJ, Dorling SR, Mandic DP (2004) Heteroscedastic kernel ridge regression. Neurocomputing 57: 105–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole TJ (1990) The LMS method for constructing normalized growth standards. Eur J Clin Nutr 44: 45–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Härdle W (1989) Applied nonparametric regression. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • He X (1997) Quantile curves without crossing. Am Stat 51(2): 186–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heagerty PJ, Pepe MS (1999) Semiparametric estimation of regression quantiles with application to standardizing weight for height and age in US children. Appl Statist 48(part 4): 533–551

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kimeldorf GS, Wahba G (1971) Some results on Tchebycheffian spline functions. J Math Anal Appl 33: 82–95

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Koenker R, Bassett G (1978) Regression quantile. Econometrica 46: 33–50

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Koenker R, Hallock KF (2001) Quantile regression. J Econ Perspect 40(4): 12–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenker R (2005) Quantile regression. Cambridge University Press, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer J (1909) Functions of positive and negative and their connection with the theory of integral equations. Philos Trans R Soc A:415–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi I (2004) Non-crossing quantile regression curves by support vector and its efficient implementation. In: Proceedigns of 2004 IEEE IJCNN, vol 1, pp 401–406

  • Takeuchi I, Le QV, Sears TD, Smola AJ (2006) Nonparametric quantile estimation. J Mach Learn Res 7: 1231–1264

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Vapnik V (1995) The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xiang D, Wahba G (1996) A generalized approximate cross validation for smoothin splines with non-Gaussian data. Stat Sin 6: 675–692

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yee TW (2004) Quantile regression via vector generalized additive models. Stat Med 23: 2295–2315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeo I, Johnson RA (2000) A new family of power transformations to improve normality or symmetry. Biometrika 87: 954–959

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yu K, Lu Z, Stander J (2003) Quantile regression: applications and current research area. Statistician 52(part 3): 331–350

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Changha Hwang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shim, J., Hwang, C. & Seok, K.H. Non-crossing quantile regression via doubly penalized kernel machine. Comput Stat 24, 83–94 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-008-0123-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-008-0123-y

Keywords

Navigation