Skip to main content
Log in

RMSE-minimizing confidence intervals for the binomial parameter

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Computational Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Let X be the number of successes in n mutually independent and identically distributed Bernoulli trials, each with probability of success p. For fixed n and \(\alpha \), there are \(n + 1\) distinct two-sided \(100(1 - \alpha )\)% confidence intervals for p associated with the outcomes \({X = 0, 1, 2, \ldots , n}\). There is no known exact non-randomized confidence interval for p. Existing approximate confidence interval procedures use a formula, which often requires numerical methods to implement, to calculate confidence interval bounds. The bounds associated with these confidence intervals correspond to discontinuities in the actual coverage function. The paper does not aim to provide a formula for the confidence interval bounds, but rather to select the confidence interval bounds that minimize the root mean square error of the actual coverage function for sample size n and significance level \(\alpha \) in the frequentist context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agresti A, Coull BA (1998) Approximate is better than ‘exact’ for interval estimation of binomial proportions. Am Stat 52:119–126

  • Anscombe FJ (1956) On estimating binomial response relations. Biometrika 43:461–464

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Balch MS (2020) New two-sided confidence intervals for binomial inference derived using Walley’s imprecise posterior likelihood as a test statistic. Int J Approx Reason 123:77–98

  • Blaker H (2000) Confidence curves and improved exact confidence intervals for discrete distributions. Can J Stat 28:783–798

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Brown LD, Cai TT, DasGupta A (2001) Interval estimation for a binomial proportion. Stat Sci 16:101–117

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Clopper CJ, Pearson ES (1934) The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the binomial. Biometrika 26:404–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng LH, Deng EY, Shapiro LW (2009) The Riordan group and symmetric lattice paths. arXiv preprint. arXiv:0906.1844

  • Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1993) An Introduction to the Bootstrap. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kása Z (2009) Generating and ranking of Dyck words. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Informatica 1:109–118

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J, Jang W (2021) A generalized Agresti–Coull type confidence interval for a binomial proportion. J Korean Stat Soc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42952-021-00143-3

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lyles RH, Weiss P, Waller LA (2020) Calibrated Bayesian credible intervals for binomial proportions. J Stat Comput Simul 90:75–89

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Meeker WQ, Hahn GJ, Escobar LA (2017) Statistical intervals: a guide for practitioners and researchers, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Park H, Leemis LM (2019) Ensemble confidence intervals for binomial proportions. Stat Med 38:3460–3475

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox R (2020) A note on inferences about the probability of success. J Mod Appl Stat Methods 18(1), Article 30. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1556670420

  • Wilson EB (1927) Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference. J Am Stat Assoc 22:209–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaacoub T, Goldsman D, Mei Y, Moustakides GV (2019) Tandem-width sequential confidence intervals for a Bernoulli proportion. Seq Anal 38:163–183

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Hayeon Park, Chris Weld, two anonymous reviewers, and the editor for their helpful comments concerning this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lawrence M. Leemis.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

The structure of the algorithm for constructing the 100\((1 - \alpha )\)% RMSE-minimizing confidence interval is given below. The four existing confidence interval procedures used in the smoothing and the large-sample portions of the algorithm are the Wilson–score, Jeffreys, Arcsine, and Agresti–Coull.

figure b

This algorithm has been implemented in R in the binomTestMSE function in the conf package, which consists of about 700 lines of code. The numerical solution that minimizes the RMSE is performed by the uniroot.all function in R.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feng, K., Leemis, L.M. & Sasinowska, H. RMSE-minimizing confidence intervals for the binomial parameter. Comput Stat 37, 1855–1885 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-021-01183-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-021-01183-3

Keywords