Skip to main content
Log in

Core-selecting package auctions: a comment on revenue-monotonicity

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Game Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Day and Milgrom (Int J Game Theory 36:393–407, 2008) argue that package auctions that select the seller’s minimum revenue in the Core are revenue-monotone. We show that no bidder-optimal Core-selecting auction can satisfy revenue-monotonicity for general preferences when there are at least three goods for sale, while the property holds for any bidder-optimal Core-selecting auction in environments with only two goods or if the characteristic function is submodular.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ausubel L, Milgrom P (2002) Ascending auctions with package bidding. Front Theor Econ 1(1): 1–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Ausubel L, Milgrom P (2006a) Combinatorial auctions, chapter 3: Ascending proxy auctions. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 79–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Ausubel L, Milgrom P (2006b) Combinatorial Auctions, chapter 1: The lovely but lonely Vickrey auctions. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 17–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Ausubel L, Cramton P, Milgrom P (2006) Combinatorial auctions, chapter 5: The clock-proxy auction: a practical combinatorial auction design. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 115–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernheim DB, Whinston M (1986) Menu auctions, resource allocation and economic influence. Q J Econ 101(1): 1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bikhchandani S, Ostroy J (2002) The package assignment model. J Econ Theory 107(2): 377–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day R, Milgrom P (2008) Core-selecting package auctions. Int J Game Theory 36(3): 393–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day R, Raghavan S (2007) Fair payments for efficient allocations in public sector combinatorial auctions. Manage Sci 53(9): 1389–1406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Vries S, Schummer J, Vohra R (2007) On ascending Vickrey auctions for heterogenous objects. J Econ Theory 132: 95–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkes DC (2006) Combinatorial auctions, chapter 2: Iterative combinatorial auctions. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 41–78

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurent Lamy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lamy, L. Core-selecting package auctions: a comment on revenue-monotonicity. Int J Game Theory 39, 503–510 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-009-0188-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-009-0188-z

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation