Skip to main content
Log in

Equilibrium selection via replicator dynamics in \(2 \times 2\) coordination games

  • Published:
International Journal of Game Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies two equilibrium selection methods based on replicator dynamics. A Nash equilibrium is called centroid dominant if the trajectory of the replicator dynamics starting at the centroid of the strategy simplex converges to it. On the other hand, an equilibrium is called basin dominant if it has the largest basin of attraction. These two concepts are compared with risk dominance in the context of \(2 \times 2\) bimatrix coordination games. The main results include (a) if a Nash equilibrium is both risk dominant and centroid dominant, it must have the largest basin of attraction, (b) the basin dominant equilibrium must be risk dominant or centroid dominant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Binmore K, Samuelson L (1997) Muddling through: noisy equilibrium selection. J Econ Theory 74:235–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgers T, Sarin R (1997) Learning through reinforcement and replicator dynamics. J Econ Theory 77:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown GW (1951) Iterative solution of games by fictitious play. In: Koopmans T (ed) Activity analysis of production and allocation. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster D, Young HP (1990) Stochastic evolutionary game dynamics. Theor Popul Biol 38:219–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golman R, Page SE (2010) Basins of attraction and equilibrium selection under different learning rules. J Evol Econ 20:49–72

  • Harsanyi JC, Selten R (1988) A general theory of equilibrium selection in games. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilbe C (2011) Local replicator dynamics: a simple link between deterministic and stochastic models of evolutionary game theory. Bull Math Biol 73:2068–2087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofbauer J (1999) The spatially dominant equilibrium of a game. Ann Oper Res 89:233–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofbauer J, Sandholm W (2002) On the global convergence of stochastic fictitious play. Econometrica 70:2265–2294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofbauer J, Sigmund K (1998) Evolutionary games and population dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hofbauer J, Sorger G (1999) Perfect foresight and equilibrium selection in symmetric potential games. J Econ Theory 85:1–23

  • Hofbauer J, Hutson V, Vickers GT (1997) Travelling waves for games in economics and biology. Nonlinear Anal Theory Methods Appl 30:1235–1244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kandori M, Mailath GJ, Rob R (1993) Learning, mutation, and long run equilibria in games. Econometrica 61:29–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim Y (1996) Equilibrium selection in \(n\)-person coordination games. Games Econ Behav 15:203–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsui A, Matsuyama K (1995) An approach to equilibrium selection. J Econ Theory 65:415–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey RD, Palfrey TA (1995) Quantal response equilibria for normal form games. Games Econ Behav 10:6–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris S, Rob R, Shin HS (1995) \(p\)-dominance and belief potential. Econometrica 63:145–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak MA, Sigmund K (2004) Evolutionary dynamics of biological games. Science 303:793–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson L (1997) Evolutionary games and equilibrium selection. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling TC (1960) The strategy of conflict. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlag K (1998) Why imitate, and if so, how? A boundedly rational approach to multi-armed bandits. J Econ Theory 78:130–156

  • Taylor P, Jonker L (1978) Evolutionary stable strategies and game dynamics. Math Biosci 50:145–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Huyck JB, Battalio RC, Beil RO (1990) Tacit coordination games, strategic uncertainty, and coordination failure. Am Econ Rev 80:234–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Weibull J (1995) Evolutionary game theory. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Young HP (1993) The evolution of conventions. Econometrica 61:57–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeeman EC (1980) Population dynamics from game theory. In: Nitecki Z, Robinson C (eds) Global theory of dynamical systems, lecture notes in mathematics, vol 819. Springer, Berlin, pp 471–497

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Mathias Staudigl and Christian Hilbe for helpful discussions. We also thank the associate editor and two anonymous reviewers for useful comments. This research received financial support from the NSFC (Project No. 11301032) of China, “the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities” of China and the Viennese WWTF (Project No. MA09-017) of Austria.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Boyu Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, B., Hofbauer, J. Equilibrium selection via replicator dynamics in \(2 \times 2\) coordination games. Int J Game Theory 44, 433–448 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-014-0437-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-014-0437-7

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation