Abstract.
It is shown that no solution concept that selects sequentially rational (perfect, proper, persistent, or members of some stable set of) equilibria satisfies the following consistency property. Suppose that in every solution of the game G, player i's action is a, and denote by G a the game in which player i is restricted to choose a. Then some player j≠i has an action c that is used with positive probability in both some solution of G and some solution of G a. This result illustrates a conflict between a mild consistency condition and sequential rationality.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received: January 2001/Final version: April 2002
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Quesada, A. A conflict between sequential rationality and consistency principles. Game Theory 31, 13–18 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001820200103
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001820200103