Abstract
We introduce the time-consistency concept that is inspired by the so-called “principle of optimality” of dynamic programming and demonstrate – via an example – that the conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) need not be time-consistent in a multi-stage case. Then, we give the formulation of the target-percentile risk measure which is time-consistent and hence more suitable in the multi-stage investment context. Finally, we also generalize the value-at-risk and CVaR to multi-stage risk measures based on the theory and structure of the target-percentile risk measure.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Artzner P, Delbaen F, Eber JM, Heath D (1999) Coherent measures of risk. Math Finance 9: 203–227
Bellman R, Dreyfus S (1962) Applied dynamic programming. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Boda K, Filar JA, Lin YL, Spanjers L (2004) Stochastic target hitting time and the problem of early retirement. IEEE Trans Automat Control 49(3):409–419
Bouakiz M, Kebir Y (1995) Target-level criterion in Markov decision processes. J Optim Theory Appl 86:1–15
Filar JA, Kallenberg LCM, Lee HM (1989) Variance-penalized Markov decision processes. Math Oper Res 14:147–161
Filar JA, Krass D, Ross KW (1995) Percentile performance criteria for limiting average markov decision processes. IEEE AC 40:2–10
Howard RA, Matheson JE (1972) Risk-sensitive Markov decision processes. Manage Sci 18: 356–369
Larsen H, Mausser H, Uryasev S (2002) Algorithms for optimization of value-at-risk. In: Pardalos P, Tsitsiringos VK (eds). Financial engineering, e-Commerce and supply chain. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 129–157
Lin YL, Wu CB, Kang BD (2003) Optimal models with maximizing probability of first achieving target value in the preceding stages. Sci China Ser A Math 46(3):396–414
Markowitz HM (1959) Portfolio selection: efficient diversification of investment. Wiley, New York
Puterman ML (1994) Markov decision processes: discrete stochastic dynamic programming. Wiley, New York
Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2000) Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J Risk 2:21–42
Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2002a) Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions. J Bank Finance 26:1443–1471
Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2002b) Deviation measures in risk analysis and optimization. Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Florida, Florida
Wu CB, Lin YL (1999) Minimizing risk models in Markov decision processes with policies depending on target values. J Math Anal Appl 231:47–67
Yu SX, Lin YL, Yan PF (1998) Optimization models for the first arrival target distribution function in discrete time. J Math Anal Appl 225:193–223
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boda, K., Filar, J.A. Time Consistent Dynamic Risk Measures. Math Meth Oper Res 63, 169–186 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00186-005-0045-1
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00186-005-0045-1