Skip to main content
Log in

A review and comparison of hybrid and pull-type production control strategies

  • Published:
OR Spectrum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

In order to overcome the disadvantages of Kanban Control Strategy (KCS) in non-repetitive manufacturing environments, two research approaches have been followed in the literature in past two decades. The first approach has been concerned with developing new, or combining existing, pull-type production control strategies in order to maximise the benefits of pull control while increasing the ability of a production system to satisfy demand. The second approach has focused on how best to combine Just-In-Time (JIT) and Material-Requirements-Planning (MRP) philosophies in order to maximise the benefits of pull control in non-repetitive manufacturing environments. This paper provides a review of the research activities in these two approaches, presents a comparison between a Production Control Strategy (PCS) from each approach, and presents a comparison of the performance of several pull-type production control strategies in addressing the Service Level vs. WIP trade-off in an environment with low variability and a light-to-medium demand load.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Geraghty.

Additional information

Correspondence to: John Geraghty

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Geraghty, J., Heavey, C. A review and comparison of hybrid and pull-type production control strategies. OR Spectrum 27, 435–457 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-005-0204-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-005-0204-z

Keywords:

Navigation