Skip to main content
Log in

A log-robust optimization approach to portfolio management

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
OR Spectrum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a robust optimization approach to portfolio management under uncertainty that builds upon insights gained from the well-known Lognormal model for stock prices, while addressing the model’s limitations, in particular, the issue of fat tails being underestimated in the Gaussian framework and the active debate on the correct distribution to use. Our approach, which we call Log-robust in the spirit of the Lognormal model, does not require any probabilistic assumption, and incorporates the randomness on the continuously compounded rates of return by using range forecasts and a budget of uncertainty, thus capturing the decision-maker’s degree of risk aversion through a single, intuitive parameter. Our objective is to maximize the worst-case portfolio value (over a set of allowable deviations of the uncertain parameters from their nominal values) at the end of the time horizon in a one-period setting; short sales are not allowed. We formulate the robust problem as a linear programming problem and derive theoretical insights into the worst-case uncertainty and the optimal allocation. We then compare in numerical experiments the Log-robust approach with the traditional robust approach, where range forecasts are applied directly to the stock returns. Our results indicate that the Log-robust approach significantly outperforms the benchmark with respect to 95 or 99% Value-at-Risk. This is because the traditional robust approach leads to portfolios that are far less diversified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al Najjab M, Thiele A (2007) The Log-Logistic option pricing model. Technical report. Lehigh University, Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Bethlehem

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Tal A, Nemirovski A (1999) Robust solutions to uncertain programs. Oper Res Lett 25: 1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Tal A, Boyd S, Nemirovski A (2006) Extending scope of robust optimization: comprehensive robust counterparts of uncertain problems. Math Prog B 107: 63–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertsekas D (1999) Nonlinear programming 2nd edn. Athena Scientific, Belmont

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertsimas D, Pachamanova D (2008) Robust multiperiod portfolio management with transaction costs. Comput Oper Res 35(1): 3–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertsimas D, Sim M (2004) The price of robustness. Oper Res 52(1): 35–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertsimas D, Thiele A (2006) Robust and data-driven optimization: modern decision-making under uncertainty, chap 4. INFORMS Tutorials in Operations Research

  • Black F, Scholes M (1973) The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. J Polit Econ 81: 637–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blattberg R, Gonedes N (1974) A comparison of the stable and student distributions as statistical models for stock prices. J Bus 47: 244–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd S, Vandenberghe L (2004) Convex optimization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopra V, Ziemba W (1993) The effect of errors in means, variances, and covariances on optimal portfolio choice. J Portf Manag 19: 6–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cont R (2001) Empirical properties of asset returns—stylized facts and statistical issues. Quant Finance 1(2): 223–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdogan E, Goldfarb D, Iyengar G (2004) Robust portfolio management. Technical report. Columbia University, Department of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research, New York

  • Fabozzi F, Kolm P, Pachamanova D, Focardi S (2007) Robust portfolio optimization and management. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama E (1965) The behavior of stock prices. J Bus 38: 34–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldfarb D, Iyengar G (2003) Robust portfolio selection problems. Math Oper Res 28: 1–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull JC (2002) Options, futures and other derivatives, 5th edn. Upper Saddle River, Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen D, deVries C (1991) On the frequency of large stock returns—putting booms and busts into perspective. Rev Econ Stat 73(1): 18–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kon S (1984) Models of stock returns—a comparison. J Finance 39: 147–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz HM (1959) Portfolio selection: efficient diversification of investments. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pachamanova D (2006) Handling parameter uncertainty in portfolio risk minimization. J Portf Manag 32(4): 70–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson M, Smith T (1993) A test for multivariate normality in stock returns. J Bus 66: 295–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aurélie Thiele.

Additional information

B. Kawas’s work supported in part by NSF Grant CMMI-0757983.

A. Thiele’s work supported in part by NSF Grant CMMI-0757983 and an IBM Faculty Award.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kawas, B., Thiele, A. A log-robust optimization approach to portfolio management. OR Spectrum 33, 207–233 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-008-0162-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-008-0162-3

Keywords

Navigation