Skip to main content

Advertisement

Socially responsible modeling: a stakeholder approach to the implementation of ethical modeling in operations research

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
OR Spectrum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A common dilemma for modelers in operations research (OR) involves how to construct ethically sensitive models. Concern for ethical modeling has recently become more widespread in the OR literature. Arguably, however, this concern has not manifested into concrete frameworks for analyzing models. This paper presents an approach from the organizational ethics field for evaluating models. After first reviewing the state of ethics in OR—its relevance and current applications—a stakeholder framework for evaluating the social performance of the model is presented. Stakeholder theory is effective for assessing the impacts of models in use. The normative core underlying this theory addresses the ethical concerns in decision support systems and provides a prescriptive solution to ethical issues in modeling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackoff RL (1979) The future of operational research. Oper Res Q 30: 361–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Apte A, Apte UM, Beatty RP et al (2004) The impact of check sequencing on NSF (not-sufficient funds) fees. Interfaces 34: 97–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle (1998) Nicomachean ethics. Dover, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth L, Free C (2006) Marketing dataveillance and digital privacy: using theories of justice to understand consumers’ online privacy concerns. J Bus Ethics 67: 107–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behrens DA, Rauner MS, Caulkins JP (2008) Modelling the spread of hepatitis C via commercial tattoo parlours: implications for public health interventions. OR Spectrum 30(2): 269–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Tal A, Nemirovski A (2008) Selected topics in robust convex optimization. Math Program 112: 125–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bichescu BC, Micael J, Fry MJ (2009) Vendor-managed inventory and the effect of channel power. OR Spectrum 31(1): 195–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bies RJ, Moag JS (1986) Interactional justice: communication criteria of fairness. In: Lewicki RJ, Sheppard BH, Bazerman M (eds) Research on negotiation in organizations, vol 1. JAI Press, Greenwich, pp 43–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein A (2002) Crime modeling. Oper Res 50: 16–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brans JP (2004) The management of the Future. Ethics in operational research. Respect, multicriteria management, happiness. Eur J Oper Res 153: 466–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brans JP, Gallo G (2007) Ethics in OR/MS: past, present and future. Ann Oper Res 153: 165–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brey P (2007) Computer ethics and the right of the good. In: Proceedings of computer ethics philosophical enquiry, 7th conference, pp 46–48

  • Brown R (2005) The operation was a success but the patient died: aider priorities influence decision aid usefulness. Interfaces 35: 511–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchholz RA (1993) Principles of environmental management: the greening of business. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler JC, Chebeskov AN, Dyer JS et al (2005) The United States and Russia evaluate plutonium disposition options with multiattribute utility theory. Interfaces 35: 88–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchman CW (1970) Operations research as a profession. Manage Sci 17: B37–B53

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordoba JR, Midgley G (2006) Broadening the boundaries: an application of critical systems thinking to IS planning in Colombia. J Oper Res Soc 57: 1064–1080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crama P, De Reyck B, Degraeve Z (2008) Milestone payments or royalties: contract design for R&D licensing. Oper Res 56(6): 1539–1552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano R, Prehart CA, Chen PY (2002) Using social exchange theory to distinguish procedural from interactional justice. Group Organ Manage 27: 324–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Waegenaere A, Suijs J, Tijs S (2005) Stable profit sharing in cooperative investments. OR Spectrum 27(1): 85–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekker R, de Koster MBM, Roodbergen KJ et al (2004) Improving order-picking response time at Ankor’s warehouse. Interfaces 34: 303–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson T, Preston L (1995) The stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: concepts, evidence, implications. Acad Manage Rev 20: 65–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll C, Starik M (2004) The primordial stakeholder: advancing the conceptual consideration of stakeholder status for the natural environment. J Bus Ethics 49: 387–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer JS, Edmunds TE, Butler JC et al (1998) A multi-attribute utility analysis of alternatives for the disposition of surplus weapons-grade plutonium. Oper Res 46: 749–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington J (1994) Towards the sustainable corporation: win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. Calif Manage Rev 36: 90–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington J (1998) Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st Century business. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management. Pitman, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RE (1994) The politics of stakeholder theory: some future directions. Bus Ethics Q 4: 409–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RE (1999) Divergent stakeholder theory. Acad Manage Rev 24: 233–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RE, Wicks AC, Parmar B (2004) Stakeholder theory and the corporate objective revisited. Organ Sci 15: 364–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleße S (2003) Decision support for AIDS control programmes in Eastern Africa. OR Spectrum 25(2): 265–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallo G (2004) Operations research and ethics: responsibility, sharing and cooperation. Eur J Oper Res 153: 468–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gass SI, Assad AA (2005) An annotated timeline of operations research: an informal history. Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazis DC (2002) The origins of traffic theory. Oper Res 50: 69–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerde VW (2001) The design dimensions of the just organization: An empirical test of the relation between organization design and corporate social performance (dissertation abstract). Bus Soc 40: 472–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg J (1993) The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. In: Cropanzano R (eds) Justice in the workplace: approaching fairness in human resource management. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 70–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Hervani AA, Helms MM, Sarkis J (2005) Performance measurement for green supply chain management. Benchmarking Int J 12: 330–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes JS, Thevaranjan A (1995) Current production targets and strategic decisions by corporate managers. J Oper Manage 12(3,4): 321–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonas H (1979) Das prinzip verantwortung. Insel Verlag, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones TM (1995) Instrumental stakeholder theory: a synthesis of ethics and economics. Acad Manage Rev 20: 404–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones TM, Wicks AC (1999) Convergent stakeholder theory. Acad Manage Rev 24: 206–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaler J (2000) Positioning business ethics in relation to management and political philosophy. J Bus Ethics 24: 257–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaler J (2002) Morality and strategy in stakeholder identification. J Bus Ethics 39: 91–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan RS, Norton DP (1996) The balanced scorecard. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney RL (2002) Common mistakes in making value trade-offs. Oper Res 50: 935–945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1976) Decisions with multiple objectives. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim JJ (2009) New FICO credit score debuts. The Wall Street J 29 (January):D3

  • Kirkwood CW, Slaven MP, Maltz A (2005) Improving supply-chain reconfiguration decisions at IBM. Interfaces 35: 460–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleijnen JPC (2001) Ethical issues in modeling: some reflections. Eur J Oper Res 130: 223–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleijnen JPC (2004) Invited review: an overview of the design and analysis of simulation experiments for sensitivity analysis. Eur J Oper Res 164: 287–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch T (2000) We live in the city, not in a study. OR/MS Today 27(2)

  • Le Menestrel M, Van Wassenhove LN (2004) Ethics outside, within, or beyond OR models?. Eur J Oper Res 153: 477–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal GS (1980) What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In: Greenberg M, Willis R (eds) Social exchange: advances in theory and research. Plenum, New York, pp 27–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilly JD, Virick M (2003) The effect of personality on perceptions of justice. J Manage Psychol 21: 438–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind E, Tyler T (1988) The social psychology of procedural justice. Plenum, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mele D (2003) Organizational humanizing cultures: do they generate social capital?. J Bus Ethics 45: 3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley G (1999) Ethical dilemmas: a reply to Richard Ormerod. J Oper Res 50: 549–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley G, Munlo I, Brown M (1998) The theory and practice of boundary critique: developing housing services for older people. J Oper Res 49: 467–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Millet I (1998) Ethical decision making. J Bus Ethics 17: 1197–1204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Wood DJ (1997) Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad Manage Rev 22: 853–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller-Merbach H (2002) The cultural roots linking Europe. Eur J Oper Res 140: 212–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natarajan R, Sethuraman K, Suryseker K (2005) Reducing incremental costs associated with the delegation of incentive contracting decisions: An analysis of planning control decisions in a manufacturing setting in the presence of moral hazard. Eur J Oper Res 162(3): 816–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nivorozhkin E (2005) Market discipline of subordinated debt in banking: the case of costly bankruptcy. Eur J Oper Res 161(2): 364–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadakis IS, Kleindorfer PR (2005) Optimizing infrastructure network maintenance when benefits are interdependent. OR Spectrum 27(1): 63–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rardin RL (1998) Optimization in operations research. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauner MS (2002) Resource allocation for HIV/AIDS control programs: a model-based policy analysis. OR Spectrum 24(1): 99–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauner MS, Zeiles A, Schaffhauser-Linzatti MM, Hornik K (2003) Modeling the effects of the Austrian inpatient reimbursement system on length-of-stay distributions. OR Spectrum 25(2): 183–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J (1999) A theory of justice (revised edition). Belknap Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson DC (1993) Empiricism in business ethics: suggested research directions. J Bus Ethics 12: 585–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubenstein A (1998) Modeling bounded rationality. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta S (2004) Delegating recruitment under asymmetric information. Int J Ind Organ 22(8,9): 1327–1347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava P (1995) The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability. Acad Manage Rev 20: 936–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1957) Models of man: social and rational. Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer MS, Singer AE (1997) Observer judgments about moral agents’ ethical decisions: the role of justice and moral intensity. J Bus Ethics 16: 473–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srikantia P, Bilimoria D (1997) Isomorphism in organization and management theory. Organ Environ 10: 384–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stadtler H (2009) A framework for collaborative planning and state-of-the-art. OR Spectrum 31(1): 5–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starik M (1995) Should trees have managerial standing. J Bus Ethics 14: 207–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stead JG, Stead WE (1997) Invisible patterns: ecology and wisdom in business and profit. Bus Soc 36: 438– 441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stead JG, Stead WE (2000) Eco-enterprise strategy: standing for sustainability. J Bus Ethics 24: 312–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoddard SA (2005) Maximizing federal natural gas royalties. Interfaces 35: 381–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson DL (1999) Toward an integrative strategy of business and society: a research strategy for corporate social performance. Acad Manage Rev 24: 506–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theys M, Kunsch PL (2004) The importance of co-operation for ethical decision-making with OR. Eur J Oper Res 153: 485–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Gigch JP, Koenigsberg E, Dean B (1997) In search of an ethical science: an interview with C. West Churchman, an 80th birthday celebration. J Bus Ethics 16: 731–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock SA, Bodwell C (2007) Total responsibility management: the manual. Greenleaf Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddock SA, Bodwell C, Graves SB (2002) The new business imperative. Acad Manage Executive 16: 132–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker W, Abrahamse A, Bolten JG et al (1993) A policy analysis of Dutch river dike improvements—trading off safety, cost, and environmental impacts. RAND Paper Series, P-7816

  • Wijnberg NM (2000) Normative stakeholder theory and Aristotle: the link between ethics and politics. J Bus Ethics 25: 329–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willemain TR (1994) Insights on modeling from a dozen experts. Oper Res 42: 213–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willemain TR (1995) Model formulation: what experts think about and when. Oper Res 43: 916–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JR (1997) Doctoral colloquium keynote address: conduct, misconduct, and cargo cult science. In: Andradottir S, Healy KJ, Withers DH, Nelson BL (eds) Proceedings of the 1997 winter simulation conference, pp 1405–1413

  • Wong EY, Roederer R (2006) Should the U.S. have attacked Iraq?. OR/MS Today 33: 42–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood DJ (1991) Corporate social performance revisited. Acad Manage Rev 16: 691–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright CM, Smith ME, Wright BG (2007) Hidden costs associated with stakeholders in supply management. Acad Manage Perspect 21: 64–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Zenios SA, Chertow GM, Wein LM (2000) Dynamic allocation of kidneys to candidates on the transplant waiting list. Oper Res 48: 549–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew J. Drake.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Drake, M.J., Gerde, V.W. & Wasieleski, D.M. Socially responsible modeling: a stakeholder approach to the implementation of ethical modeling in operations research. OR Spectrum 33, 1–26 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-009-0172-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-009-0172-9

Keywords