Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Dominance and ranking interval in DEA parallel production systems

  • Original Article
  • Published:
OR Spectrum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditional network data envelopment analysis (DEA) on parallel production systems uses extreme weights to measure performance of decision-making units (DMUs) considering their inner structure. The results of considering inner structure can give further insights into the performance relative to the black-box DEA approach. However, the employment of extreme weights may reduce the informativeness of network DEA evaluation, since it ignores other optimal weights of the evaluation model. This paper concerns using all possible input/output weights in DEA to measure the performance of parallel production systems with considering inner structure. The proposed approach can make performance evaluation less dependent on any specific weights and give more meaningful results. A family of dominance relations has been defined, and we propose ratio-based efficiency analysis models to show how to compute these. One of these dominance relations, namely the R-dominance relation, can reflect the characteristic of the inner parallel structure and can be used to identify benchmarks for DMUs based on subsystems. The ranking intervals of DMUs are calculated based on the acyclic dominance relation, namely the efficiency dominance relation. Our proposed approach is demonstrated by applying it to measure performance of Chinese provinces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcaraz J, Ramón N, Ruiz JL, Sirvent I (2013) Ranking ranges in cross-efficiency evaluations. Eur J Oper Res 226(3):516–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amirteimoori A, Kordrostami S (2005) Multi-component efficiency measurement with imprecise data. Appl Math Comput 162(3):1265–1277

    Google Scholar 

  • Amirteimoori A, Nashtaei RA (2006) The role of time in multi-component efficiency analysis: an application. Appl Math Comput 177(1):11–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Badiezadeh T, Saen RF, Samavati T (2018) Assessing sustainability of supply chains by double frontier network DEA: a big data approach. Comput Oper Res 98:284–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beasley JE (1995) Determining teaching and research efficiencies. J Oper Res Soc 46(4):441–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bi GB, Ding JJ, Luo Y, Liang L (2011) Resource allocation and target setting for parallel production system based on DEA. Appl Math Model 35(9):4270–4280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bi GB, Feng CP, Ding JJ, Khan MR (2012) Estimating relative efficiency of DMU: Pareto principle and Monte Carlo oriented DEA approach. INFOR Inf Syst Oper Res 50(1):44–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao CM, Yu MM, Chen MC (2010) Measuring the performance of financial holding companies. Serv Ind J 0(6):811–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2(6):429–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook WD, Green RH (2004) Multicomponent efficiency measurement and core business identification in multiplant firms: a DEA model. Eur J Oper Res 157(3):540–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook WD, Hababou M (2001) Sales performance measurement in bank branches. Omega 29(4):299–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook WD, Hababou M, Tuenter HJ (2000) Multicomponent efficiency measurement and shared inputs in data envelopment analysis: an application to sales and service performance in bank branches. J Prod Anal 14(3):209–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Da Cruz NF, Carvalho P, Marques RC (2013) Disentangling the cost efficiency of jointly provided water and wastewater services. Utilities Policy 24:70–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diez-Ticio A, Mancebon MJ (2002) The efficiency of the Spanish police service: an application of the multiactivity DEA model. Appl Econ 34(3):351–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du J, Chen Y, Huo J (2015a) DEA for non-homogenous parallel networks. Omega 56:122–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du J, Zhu J, Cook WD, Huo J (2015b) DEA models for parallel systems: game-theoretic approaches. Asia Pac J Oper Res 32(2):1550008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyson RG, Allen R, Camanho AS, Podinovski VV, Sarrico CS, Shale EA (2001) Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. Eur J Oper Res 132(2):245–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emrouznejad A, Parker BR, Tavares G (2008) Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: a survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA. Socio Econ Plann Sci 42(3):151–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grabowski R, Grosskopf S, Kraft S (1997) Efficiency of a fixed but allocatable input: a non-parametric approach. Econ Lett 56(2):187–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell MJ (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J R Stat Soc Series A (general) 120(3):253–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong YD, Zhu J, Chen Y, Cook WD (2018) DEA as a tool for auditing: application to Chinese manufacturing industry with parallel network structures. Ann Oper Res 263:247–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahanshahloo GR, Amirteimoori AR, Kordrostami S (2004a) Multi-component performance, progress and regress measurement and shared inputs and outputs in DEA for panel data: an application in commercial bank branches. Appl Math Comput 151(1):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahanshahloo GR, Amirteimoori AR, Kordrostami S (2004b) Measuring the multi-component efficiency with shared inputs and outputs in data envelopment analysis. Appl Math Comput 155(1):283–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao C (2009) Efficiency decomposition in network data envelopment analysis: a relational model. Eur J Oper Res 192(3):949–962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao C (2012) Efficiency decomposition for parallel production systems. J Oper Res Soc 63(1):64–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao C (2014) Network data envelopment analysis: a review. Eur J Oper Res 239(1):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao C, Lin PH (2011) Qualitative factors in data envelopment analysis: a fuzzy number approach. Eur J Oper Res 211(3):586–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao C, Lin PH (2012) Efficiency of parallel production systems with fuzzy data. Fuzzy Sets Syst 198:83–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei XY, Li YJ, Xie QW, Liang L (2015) Measuring Olympics achievements based on a parallel DEA approach. Ann Oper Res 226(1):379–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li YJ, Shi X, Emrouznejad A, Liang L (2020) Ranking intervals for two-stage production systems. J Oper Res Soc 71(2):209–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li F, Zhu QY, Zhuang J (2018) Analysis of fire protection efficiency in the United States: a two-stage DEA-based approach. Or Spectr 40:23–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin RY, Chen ZP, Hu QH, Li ZX (2017) Dynamic network DEA approach with diversification to multi-period performance evaluation of funds. Or Spectr 39:821–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis HF, Sexton TR (2004) Network DEA: efficiency analysis of organizations with complex internal structure. Comput Oper Res 31(9):1365–1410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo Storto C (2020) Measuring the efficiency of the urban integrated water service by parallel network DEA: the case of Italy. J Prod Anal 276:123170

    Google Scholar 

  • Mar Molinero C (1996) On the joint determination of efficiencies in a data envelopment analysis context. J Oper Res Soc 47(10):1273–1279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mar Molinero C, Tsai PF (1997) Some mathematical properties of a DEA model for the joint determination of efficiencies. J Oper Res Soc 48(1):51–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogge N, De Jaeger S (2012) Evaluating the efficiency of municipalities in collecting and processing municipal solid waste: a shared input DEA-model. Waste Manag 32(10):1968–1978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salo A, Punkka A (2011) Ranking intervals and dominance relations for ratio-based efficiency analysis. Manag Sci 57(1):200–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stefaniec A, Hosseini K, Xie JH, Li YJ (2020) Sustainability assessment of inland transportation in China: a triple bottom line-based network DEA approach. Transp Res D Transp Environ 80:102258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai PF, Mar Molinero C (2002) A variable returns to scale data envelopment analysis model for the joint determination of efficiencies with an example of the UK health service. Eur J Oper Res 141(1):21–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaz CB, Camanho AS, Guimarães RC (2010) The assessment of retailing efficiency using network data envelopment analysis. Ann Oper Res 173(1):5–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Zhu QY, Chu JF, Liu HW, Liang L (2016) Measuring energy and environmental efficiency of transportation systems in China based on a parallel DEA approach. Transp Res d Transp Environ 48:460–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong BB, Wu J, An QX, Chu JF, Liang L (2018) Resource allocation of a parallel system with interaction consideration using a DEA approach: an application to Chinese input–output table. Infor 56(3):298–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiong X, Yang GL, Guan ZC (2020) A parallel DEA-based method for evaluation parallel independent subunits with heterogeneous outputs. J Informetr 14(3):101049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang F, Ang S, Xia Q, Yang CC (2012) Ranking DMUs by using interval DEA cross efficiency matrix with acceptability analysis. Eur J Oper Res 223:483–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Ma B, Koike M (2000) Efficiency-measuring DEA model for production system with k independent subsystems. J Oper Res Soc Japan 43(3):343–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu MM (2008) Measuring the efficiency and return to scale status of multi-mode bus transit–evidence from Taiwan’s bus system. Appl Econ Lett 15(8):647–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu MM, Fan CK (2006) Measuring the cost effectiveness of multimode bus transit in the presence of accident risks. Transp Plan Techn 29(5):383–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuo KR, Guan JC (2017) Measuring the R&D efficiency of regions by a parallel DEA game model. Scientometrics 112:175–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the editor, the associate editor, and the two anonymous referees for their constructive comments and suggestions. Alec Morton also would like to thank the University of Science and Technology of China for their hospitality while working on this paper, as well as the government of Anhui province for their support under the 100 Talents scheme. This paper was finished while Xiyang Lei was visiting the University of Strathclyde with financial support from the China Scholarship Council. This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 71801075, 72171072, 71701060) and the Fund for International Cooperation and Exchange of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71110107024).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, 230009, Anhui, People’s Republic of China

    Xiyang Lei

  2. School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230026, Anhui, People’s Republic of China

    Yongjun Li

  3. Management Science Department, University of Strathclyde Business School, Glasgow, G4 0QU, Scotland, UK

    Alec Morton

Authors
  1. Xiyang Lei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yongjun Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alec Morton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiyang Lei.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lei, X., Li, Y. & Morton, A. Dominance and ranking interval in DEA parallel production systems. OR Spectrum 44, 649–675 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-021-00660-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-021-00660-x

Keywords