Abstract
We construct non-unique Leray–Hopf solutions for some forced dyadic models for magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) when the intermittency dimension \(\delta \) is less than 1. Conventionally, the interaction of the velocity and magnetic fields is a major challenge in the context of MHD. However, in the dyadic MHD model scenario, we exploit to our benefit certain symmetries in the interactions of the fields to obtain a non-uniqueness result. In contrast, uniqueness of the Leray–Hopf solution to the dyadic MHD models is established in the case of \(\delta \ge 1\). Analogous results on uniqueness and non-uniqueness of Leray–Hopf solution are also obtained for dyadic models of MHD with fractional diffusion.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Our manuscript has no associated data.
References
Albritton, D., Brué, E., Colombo, M.: Non-uniqueness of Leray solutions of the forced Navier–Stokes equations. Ann. Math. 196(1), 415–455 (2022)
Barbato, D., Flandoli, F., Morandin, F.: Energy dissipation and self-similar solutions for an unforced inviscid dyadic model. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 363(4), 1925–1946 (2011)
Barbato, D., Morandin, F., Romito, M.: Smooth solutions for the dyadic model. Nonlinearity 24(11), 3083–3097 (2011)
Beekie, R., Buckmaster, T., Vicol, V.: Weak solutions of ideal MHD which do not conserve magnetic helicity. Ann. PDE (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40818-020-0076-1
Chen, K., Liu, J.: Weak solutions of the three-dimensional hypoviscous elastodynamics with finite kinetic energy. arXiv: 2104.11872 (2021)
Cheskidov, A.: Blow-up in finite time for the dyadic model of the Navier–Stokes equations. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 360(10), 5101–5120 (2008)
Cheskidov, A., Dai, M.: Kolmogorov’s dissipation number and the number of degrees of freedom for the 3D Navier–Stokes equations. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburg Sect. A 149(2), 429–446 (2019)
Cheskidov, A., Friedlander, S.: The vanishing viscosity limit for a dyadic model. Physica D 238, 783–787 (2009)
Cheskidov, A., Shvydkoy, R.: A unified approach to regularity problems for the 3D Navier-Stokes and Euler equations: the use of Kolmogorov’s dissipation range. J. Math. Fluid Mech. 16(2), 263–273 (2014)
Cheskidov, A., Friedlander, S., Pavlović, N.: Inviscid dyadic model of turbulence: the fixed point and Onsager’s conjecture. J. Math. Phys. 48(6), 065503, 16 (2007)
Cheskidov, A., Friedlander, S., Pavlović, N.: An inviscid dyadic model of turbulence: the global attractor. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 26(3), 781–794 (2010)
Dai, M., Friedlander, S.: Dyadic models for ideal MHD. J. Math. Fluid Mech. 24, 21 (2022)
Dai, M.: Blow-up of a dyadic model with intermittency dependence for the Hall MHD. Physica D 428, 133066 (2021)
Desnyanskiy, V.N., Novikov, E.A.: Evolution of turbulence spectra toward a similarity regime. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Fiz. Atmos. Okeana 10, 127–136 (1974)
Faraco, D., Lindberg, S., Székelyhidi, L.: Magnetic helicity, weak solutions and relaxation of ideal MHD. arXiv: 2109.09106 (2021)
Faraco, D., Lindberg, S., Székelyhidi, L.: Bounded solutions of ideal MHD with compact support in space-time. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 239, 51–93 (2021)
Filonov, N.: Uniqueness of the Leray–Hopf solution for a dyadic model. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 369(12), 8663–8684 (2017)
Filonov, N., Khodunov, P.: Non-uniqueness of Leray–Hopf solutions for a dyadic model. St. Petersburg Math. J. 32, 371–387 (2021)
Friedlander, S., Pavlović, N.: Blowup in a three-dimensional vector model for the Euler equations. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 57(6), 705–725 (2004)
Gledzer, E.B.: System of hydrodynamic type admitting two quadratic integrals of motion. Soviet Phys. Dokl. 18, 216–217 (1973)
Gloaguen, C., Léorat, J., Pouquet, A., Grappin, R.: A scalar model for MHD turbulence. Physica D 17(2), 154–182 (1985)
Hopf, E.: Über die Anfangswertaufgabe für die hydrodynamischen Grundgleichungen. Math. Nachr. 4, 213–231 (1951)
Jeong, I., Li, D.: A blow-up result for dyadic models of the Euler equations. Commun. Math. Phys. 337, 1027–1034 (2015)
Katz, N., Pavlović, N.: Finite time blow-up for a dyadic model of the Euler equations. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 357(2), 695–708 (2005)
Kiselev, A., Zlatoš, A.: On discrete models of the Euler equation. Int. Math. Res. Not. 38, 2315–2339 (2005)
Leray, J.: Sur le mouvement d’un liquide visqueux emplissant l’espace. Acta Math. 63(1), 193–248 (1934)
L’vov, V.S., Podivilov, E., Pomyalov, A., Procaccia, I., Vandembroucq, D.: Improved shell model of turbulence. Phys. Rev. E (3) 58, 1811–1822 (1998)
Mailybaev, A.A.: Continuous representation for shell models of turbulence. Nonlinearity 28(7), 2479 (2015)
Ohkitani, K., Yamada, M.: Temporal intermittency in the energy cascade process and local Lyapunov analysis in fully-developed model of turbulence. Progr. Theoret. Phys. 81, 329–341 (1989)
Onsager, L.: Statistical hydrodynamics. Nuovo Cimento 9(6), 279–287 (1949)
Plunian, F., Stepanov, R., Frick, P.: Shell models of magnetohydrodynamic turbulence. Phys. Rep. 523, 1–60 (2013)
Vishik, M.: Instability and non-uniqueness in the Cauchy problem for the Euler equations of an ideal incompressible fluid. Part I. arXiv: 1805.09426 (2018a)
Vishik, M.: Instability and non-uniqueness in the Cauchy problem for the Euler equations of an ideal incompressible fluid. Part II. arXiv: 1805.09440 (2018b)
Acknowledgements
M. Dai is partially supported by the NSF Grants DMS-1815069 and DMS-2009422. S. Friedlander is partially supported by the NSF Grant DMS-1613135. S. Friedlander is grateful to IAS for its hospitality in 2020–2021. M. Dai is also grateful to IAS for its hospitality in 2021–2022. The authors are very grateful to the anonymous referees for their constructive suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Paul Newton.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Dai, M., Friedlander, S. Uniqueness and Non-Uniqueness Results for Forced Dyadic MHD Models. J Nonlinear Sci 33, 10 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00332-022-09868-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00332-022-09868-9