Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cognitive Support for the Organization of Writing

  • Published:
New Generation Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes a novel framework and a system to support writing professional documents. Our framework focuses on aiding the process of organizing ideas and constructing logical connections between text chunks in formal documents. Most previous approaches dealing with these issues have utilized one of three types of representations: a tree, a map, and a network. However, they all have their strengths and weaknesses. The tree is superior in helping the writers to grasp the hierarchical structure of a document, but it is difficult to express vague relationships among parts of a document. The map is easy to operate, but it restricts freedom in spatial organization. The network has flexibility to express what writers want, but it requires additional graphical objects to specify relationships among parts and it cannot be naturally transformed into a linear document. In our approach, the tree and the map are integrated: the local structure of a document is defined by the map while the global structure of the document is defined by the tree. Combining both representations has the following advantages: (1) it leverages the benefits of both representations, (2) it seamlessly supports both top-down organization and bottom-up organization, and (3) it smoothly supports writing from an ill-organized state to a well-organized state. Based on the proposed framework, we have built a system called iWeaver. We describe experiments in which six users wrote six technical documents using the system. The results show that our framework is an effective aid for constructing long, structured documents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amitani, S., A method and a system for supporting the process of knowledge creation, PhD thesis, The University of Tokyo, 2004.

  2. Baldonado, M.Q.W., “A. Woodru., and A. Kuchinsky. Guidelines for using multiple views in information visualization,” in Proc. of Advanced Visual Interface (AVI), 2000.

  3. Boden, M., The Creative Mind, Basic Books, 1991.

  4. Bridwell-Bowles, L.S., Johnson, P. and Brehe, S., “Composing and computers: Case studies of experienced writers,” in Writing in real time: Modeling production processes (Ann Matsuhashi ed.), Ablex, New York, pp. 81-107, 1987.

  5. Buzan, T., The mind map book, Penguin, New York, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, C., “Writing with collaborative hypertext: Analysis and modeling,” Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 48(11), pp. 1049-1066, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Conklin, J., “Hypertext: an introduction and survey,” IEEE Computer, 20(9), pp. 17-41, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Creativity-Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention, HarperCollings Publishers, 1996.

  9. Etchison, C, “Word processing: A helpful tool for basic writers,” Computer and Composition, 6(2), pp. 33-43, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Finke, R.A., Ward, T.B. and Smith, S.M., Creative cognition-Theory, research, and application, The MIT Press, 1992.

  11. Fischer, G., Nakakoji, K., Ostwald, J., Stehl, G. and Sumner, T., “Embedding critics in design environments,” The Knowledge Engineering Review Journal, 8(4), pp. 285-307, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Flower, L.S. and Hayes, J.R., “The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints,” in Cognitive processes in writing (Gregg, L.W. and Steinberg, E.R., eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 31-50, 1980.

  13. Galbraith, D. and Torrance, M., “Conceptual processes in writing: From problem solving to text production,” in Knowing what to write: Conceptual processes in text production (Torrance, M. and Galbraith, D. eds.), Amsterdam University Press, pp. 1-12, 1999.

  14. Gero, J.S., “Computational models of creative design process,” in Artificial Intelligence and creativity (Dartnal, T. ed.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 269-281, 1994.

  15. Hahn J. and Kim, J., “Why are some diagrams easier to work with? Effects of diagrammatic representation on the cognitive integration process of systems analysis and design,” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 6(3), pp. 181-213, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hawisher, G.E., “The e.ects of word processing on the revision strategies of college freshman,” Research in the Teaching of English, 21(2), pp. 145-159, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hayes, J.R. and Flower, L.S., “Identifying the organization of writing process,” in Cognitive processes in writing (Gregg, L.W. and Steinberg, E.R. eds.), Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 3-30, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hayes, J.R. and Flower, L.S., “Writing as problem solving,” Visible Language, 14(4), pp. 288-299, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hershey, W., “Software review: Idea processors,” Byte, pp. 337-350, 6 1985.

  20. Hori, K., “A system for aiding creative concept formation,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 24(6), pp. 552-559, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hunter, W.J. and Begoray, J., “A framework for the activities involved in the writing process,” The Writing Notebook, 7(3), 1990.

  22. Langer, J.A., “The effects of available information on responses to school writing tasks,” Research in the Teaching of English, 18(1), pp. 27-44, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lawson, B., How designers think-The design process demystified (third edition), Architectural Press, 1997.

  24. Lutz, J.A., “A study of professional and experienced writers revising and editing at the computer with pen and paper,” Research in the Teaching of English, 21(4), pp. 398-421, 1987.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Michael, J., “Storyspace as a hypertext system for writers and readers of varying ability,” in Proc. of Hypertext, 1991.

  26. Moore, M.T., “The relationship between the originality of essays and variables in the problem-discovery process: A study of creative and non-creative middle school students,” Research in the Teaching in English, 19(1), pp. 84-95, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nakakoji, K., Yamamoto, Y. and Takeda, S., “Two-dimensional positioning as a means to represent strategic knowledge in design,” in Proc. of Strategic Knowledge and Concept Formation (SKCF) ’99, pp. 109-121, 10 1999.

  28. Neuwirth, C., Kaufer, D., Chimera, R. and Gillespie, T., “The notes program: A hypertext application for writing from source texts,” in Proc. of Hypertext, pp. 121-142, 1987.

  29. Neuwirth, C.M. and Kaufer, D.S., “The role of external representations in the writing process: Implications for the design of hypertext-based writing tools,” in Proc. of Hypertext, pp. 319-341, 1989.

  30. Neuwirth, C.M., Kaufer, D.S., Chandhok, R. and Morris, J.H., “Issues in the design of computer support for co-authoring and commenting.” in Proc. of CSCW, pp. 183-195, 1990.

  31. Norman, D.A., Turn signals are the facial expressions of automobiles, Addison-Wesley, 1992.

  32. O’Hara, K. and Sellen, A., “A comparison of reading paper and on-line documents,” in Proc. of CHI, 1997.

  33. O’Hara, K.P., Taylor, A., Newman, W. and Sellen, A.J., “Understanding the materiality of writing from multiple sources,” Int. Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 56(4), pp. 269-305, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Schöon, D.A., The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action, Basic Books, New York, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sellen, A.J. and Harper, R.H., The myth of the paperless office, The MIT Press, 2001.

  36. Sharples, M., “Cognitive support and the rhythm of design,” in Artificial intelligence and creativity (Dartnal, T. ed.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 385-401, 1994.

  37. Sharples, M., “An account of writing as creative design,” in The science of writing (Levy, C.M. and Ransdell, S. eds.), pp. 127-148. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1996.

  38. Sharples, M., How we write: Writing as creative design, Routledge, 1999.

  39. Sharples, M., Clutterbuck, A. and Goodlet, J., “A comparison of algorithms for hypertext notes network linearization,” Int. Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 40(4), pp. 727-752, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Sharples, M., Goodlet, J. and Pemberton, L., “Developing a Writer’s Assistant,” in Technology and writing: Readings in the psychology of written communication (Hartley, J. ed.), Jessica Kingsley, pp. 209-220, 1992.

  41. Sharples, M. and Pemberton, L., “Representing writing: External representations and the writing process,” in Computer and writing: State of the art (Holt, P.O. and Williams, N. eds.), Intellect, Oxford, pp. 319-336, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Shibata, H. and Hori, K., “A framework to support writing as design using multiple representations,” in Proc. of APCHI, 2002.

  43. Shibata, H. and Hori, K., “An information management system with the facility to support long-term creative thinking,” New Generation Computing, 21(1), pp. 23-36, 2003.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Shibata, H. and Hori, K., “Toward an integrated environment for writing,” in Proc. of European Conference on Artificial Intelligence Workshop on Chance Discovery, 2004.

  45. Shipman F.M. and Marshall, C.C., “Formality considered harmful: Experiences, emerging themes, and directions on the use of formal representations in interactive systems,” Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 8(4), pp. 333-352, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Shipman, F.M., Marshall, C.C. and Moran, T.P., “Finding and using implicit structure in human-organized spatial layouts of information,” in Proc. of CHI, pp. 346-353, 1995.

  47. Shipman, F.M. and McCall, R., “Supporting incremental formalization with the hyper-object substrate,” ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 17(2), pp. 199-227, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Shneiderman, B., “Creating creativity: User interfaces for supporting innovation,” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(1), pp. 114-138, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Smith, J.B., Weiss, S.F. and Ferguson, G.J., “A hypertext writing environment and its cognitive basis,” in Proc. of Hypertext, pp. 195-214, 1987.

  50. Sugimoto, M., Hori, K. and Ohsuga, S., “A system for visualizing viewpoints and its application to intelligent activity support,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C, 28(1), pp. 124-136, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Sumi, Y., Hori, K. and Ohsuga, S., “Computer-aided thinking by mapping text-objects into metric spaces,” Artificial Intelligence, 91(1), pp. 71-84, 1997.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. Sumner, T. and Shum, B., “From documents to discourse: Shifting conceptions of scholarly publishing,” in Proc. of CHI, 1998.

  53. Suwa, M., Gero, J. and Purcell, T., “Unexpected discoveries and s-invention of design requirements: Important vehicles for a design process,” Design Studies, 21(4), pp. 539-567, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Suwa, M., Pucell, T. and Gero, J., “Macroscopic analysis of design processes based on a scheme for coding designers’ cognitive actions,” Design Studies, 19(4), pp. 455-483, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Williams, N., “New technology. New writing. New problems?”, in Computers and Writing State of the Art, Intellect Books, pp. 1-19, 1992.

  56. Willinsky, J., “When university students word process their assignments,” Computers in the Schools, 6, pp. 83-96, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Wood, C.C., “A cognitive dimensional analysis of idea sketches,” Technical report, School of Cognitive and Computing Sciences, University of Sussex, 1993.

  58. Yamada, K., Nakakoji, K., Masuda, H. and Baba, Y., “Computer support for customizing e-learning contents: Detection of similar users by collaborative filtering,” in Proc. of JSAI SIG-IES-A202-10, pp. 57-62, 2002. (in Japanese).

  59. Yamamoto, Y., Nakakoji, K. and Aoki, A., “Spatial hypertext for linear-information authoring: Interaction design and system development based on the art design principle,” in Proc. of Hypertext, pp. 35-44, 2002.

  60. Zhang, J., “The nature of external representations in problem solving,” Cognitive Science, 21(2), pp. 179-217, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Hirohito Shibata

    Present address: Corporate Research Group, Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd., 430 Sakai, Nakai-machi, Ashigarakami-gun, Kanagawa-ken, 259-0157, Japan

Authors and Affiliations

  1. RCAST, The University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 153-8904, Japan

    Hirohito Shibata & Koichi Hori

Authors
  1. Hirohito Shibata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Koichi Hori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hirohito Shibata.

About this article

Cite this article

Shibata, H., Hori, K. Cognitive Support for the Organization of Writing. New Gener. Comput. 26, 97–124 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00354-008-0037-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00354-008-0037-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation