Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Context-Based Persuasion Analysis of Sentiment Polarity Disambiguation in Social Media Text Streams

  • Published:
New Generation Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bayesian belief network is an effective and practical approach that is widely acceptable for real-time series prediction and decision making. However, its computational efforts and complexity increased exponentially with increased number of states. Hence, this research paper a proposed approach inspired by context-based persuasion analysis of sentiment analysis and its impact on the propagation of false information is designed. As social media text consist of unwanted information and needs to be addressed including effective polarity prediction of a sentimentwise ambiguous word in generic contexts. Therefore, in proposed approach persuasion-based strategy based on social media crowd is considered for analyzing the impact of sentimental contextual polarity in social media including pre-processing. For analyzing the polarity of sentiment, Bayesian belief network is used, whereas Turbo Parser is implemented for visual representation of diverse feature class and spontaneous hold of the relationships between features. Furthermore, to analyze the lexicons dependency on each word in terms of context, a tree-based dependency parser representation is used to count the dependency score. Features associated with sentimental words are extracted using Penn tree bank for sentiment polarity disambiguation. Therefore, a graphical model known as Bayesian network learning is opted to design a proposed approach which take care the dependency among various lexicons. Various predictors, namely, (1) pre-processing and subjectivity normalization, (2) computation of threshold and persuasion factor, and (3) extraction of sentiments from dependency parsing from the retrieved text are introduced. The findings of this study indicate that it is most important to compute the local and global context of various sentimental words to analyze the polarity of text. Furthermore, we have tested our proposed method with a standard data set and a real case study is also implemented based on COVID-19, Olympics-2020 and Russia–Ukraine war for the feasibility analysis of the proposed approach. The findings of this study imply a complex and context-dependent mechanism behind the sentiment analysis which shed lights on the efforts for resolving contextual polarity disambiguation in social media.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Data availability

Data is not available for this article.

References

  1. Abreu, J.I., Castro, I., Martínez, C., Oliva, S., Gutiérrez, Y.: Ucsc-nlp at semeval-2017 task 4: sense n-grams for sentiment analysis in twitter. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2017), pp. 807–811. (2017)

  2. Agirre, E., de Lacalle, O.L., Soroa, A.: The risk of sub-optimal use of open source nlp software: Ukb is inadvertently state-of-the-art in knowledge-based wsd. (2018). arXiv:1805.04277

  3. Albalat-Mascarell, A., Carrió-Pastor, M.L.: Self-representation in political campaign talk: a functional metadiscourse approach to self-mentions in televised presidential debates. J. Pragmat. 147, 86–99 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aston, N., Munson, T., Liddle, J., Hartshaw, G., Livingston, D., Hu, W.: Sentiment analysis on the social networks using stream algorithms. J. Data Anal. Inform. Process 2, 60–66 (2014)

  5. Bansal, A., Kumar, N.: Aspect-based sentiment analysis using attribute extraction of hospital reviews. New Gener. Comput. 40, 941–960 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00354-021-00141-3

  6. Chandra, R., Krishna, A.: Covid-19 sentiment analysis via deep learning during the rise of novel cases. (2021). arXiv:2104.10662

  7. Chaplot, D.S., Salakhutdinov, R.: Knowledge-based word sense disambiguation using topic models. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 32. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v32i1.12027

  8. Contreras Hernández, S., Tzili Cruz, M.P., Espínola Sánchez, J.M., Pérez Tzili, A.: Deep learning model for Covid-19 sentiment analysis on twitter. New Gener. Comput. 41(2), 189–212 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cortis, K., Davis, B.: Over a decade of social opinion mining: a systematic review. Artif. Intell. Rev. 54, 4873–4965 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-021-10030-2

  10. Dalmia, A., Gupta, M., Varma, V.: Iiit-h at semeval 2015: Twitter sentiment analysis–the good, the bad and the neutral! In: Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2015), pp. 520–526. (2015)

  11. Darwich, M., Noah, S.A.M., Omar, N.: Deriving the sentiment polarity of term senses using dual-step context-aware in-gloss matching. Inform. Process. Manage. 57(6), 102273 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Das, S., Kolya, A.K.: Predicting the pandemic: sentiment evaluation and predictive analysis from large-scale tweets on Covid-19 by deep convolutional neural network. Evol. Intel. 15, 1913–1934 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-021-00598-7

  13. Datta, S., Chakrabarti, S.: Aspect based sentiment analysis for demonetization tweets by optimized recurrent neural network using fire fly-oriented multi-verse optimizer. Sādhanā 46(2), 1–23 (2021)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Dong, M.P., Ruihai, Ó.M., Schaal, M., McCarthy, K., Smyth, B.: Combining similarity and sentiment in opinion mining for product recommendation. J. Intell. Inform. Syst. 46(2), 285–312 (2016)

  15. Dong, S., Zhang, X., Li, Y.: Microblog sentiment analysis method based on spectral clustering. J. Inform. Process. Syst. 14(3), 727–739 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dong, S., Wang, P., Abbas, K.: A survey on deep learning and its applications. Comput. Sci. Rev. 40, 100379 (2021)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Farooq, U., Dhamala, T.P., Nongaillard, A., Ouzrout, Y., Qadir, M.A.: A word sense disambiguation method for feature level sentiment analysis. In: 2015 9th international conference on software, knowledge, information management and applications (SKIMA), IEEE, pp. 1–8. (2015)

  18. Go, A., Bhayani, R., Huang, L.: Twitter sentiment classification using distant supervision. CS224N project report. Stanford 1(12), 2009 (2009)

  19. Gupta, R., Singh, A.K.: A differential approach for data and classification service-based privacy-preserving machine learning model in cloud environment. New Gener. Comput. 40(3), 737–764 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00354-022-00185-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jurafsky, D., Martin, J.H.: Speech and Language Processing, 3rd edn (draft), pp. 1–621. Pearson (2023). https://web.stanford.edu/~jurafsky/slp3/ed3book.pdf

  21. Kaklauskas, A., Abraham, A., Milevicius, V.: Diurnal emotions, valence and the coronavirus lockdown analysis in public spaces. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 98, 104122 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kang, L., Liu, J., Liu, L., Zhou, Z., Ye, D.: Semi-supervised emotion recognition in textual conversation via a context-augmented auxiliary training task. Inform. Process. Manage. 58(6), 102717 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kwon, S., Oh, D., Ko, Y.: Word sense disambiguation based on context selection using knowledge-based word similarity. Inform. Process. Manage. 58(4), 102551 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Li, C., Sun, Y., He, B., Wang, L., Hui, K., Yates, A., Sun, L., Xu, J.: Nprf: A neural pseudo relevance feedback framework for ad-hoc information retrieval. (2018). arXiv:1810.12936

  25. Ligthart, A., Catal, C., Tekinerdogan, B: Systematic reviews in sentiment analysis: a tertiary study. Artif. Intell. Rev. 54, 4997–5053 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-021-09973-3

  26. Majumder, A., Ekbal, A., Naskar, S.K.: Bio-molecular event trigger extraction by word sense disambiguation based on supervised machine learning using wordnet-based data decomposition and feature selection. In: Proceedings of the Global AI Congress 2019, pp. 391–398. Springer, Berlin (2020)

  27. Medford, R.J., Saleh, S.N., Sumarsono, A., Perl, T.M., Lehmann, C.U.: An “infodemic”: leveraging high-volume twitter data to understand early public sentiment for the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak. In: Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Oxford University Press US, vol 7, p ofaa258 (2020)

  28. Mestre-Mestre, E.: Emotion and sentiment polarity in parliamentary debate: A pragmatic comparative study. Corpus Pragmatics 5, 1–19 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-021-00103-6

  29. Morant, V.M., Hurtado, L.F., Pla, F.: Dsic-elirf at semeval-2016 task 4: message polarity classification in twitter using a support vector machine approach. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2016), pp. 198–201 (2016)

  30. Obadimu, A., Khaund, T., Mead, E., Marcoux, T., Agarwal, N.: Developing a socio-computational approach to examine toxicity propagation and regulation in COVID-19 discourse on YouTube. Inf. Process Manag. 58(5), 102660 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102660

  31. Pastor, C.K.: Sentiment analysis of filipinos and effects of extreme community quarantine due to coronavirus (covid-19) pandemic. SSRN 3574385 (2020)

  32. Plotnikova, N., Kohl, M., Volkert, K., Evert, S., Lerner, A., Dykes, N., Ermer, H.: Klueless: polarity classification and association. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2015), pp. 619–625 (2015)

  33. Rajita, B., Tarigopula, P., Ramineni, P., Sharma, A., Panda, S.: Application of evolutionary algorithms in social networks: a comparative machine learning perspective. New Gener. Comput. 41(2), 401–444 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Repaka, R., Pallelra, R.R., Koppula, A.R., Movva, V.S.: Umduluth-cs8761-12: a novel machine learning approach for aspect based sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2015), pp. 742–747 (2015)

  35. Rosenthal, S., Farra, N., Nakov, P.: Semeval-2017 task 4: sentiment analysis in twitter. In: Proceedings of the 11th international workshop on semantic evaluation (SemEval-2017), pp. 502–518 (2017)

  36. Saias, J.: Sentiue: Target and aspect based sentiment analysis in SemEval-2015 Task 12. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2015), pp. 767–771, Denver, Colorado. Association for Computational Linguistics (2015)

  37. Samadi, M., Mousavian, M., Momtazi, S.: Deep contextualized text representation and learning for fake news detection. Inform. Process. Manage. 58(6), 102723 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Seifollahi, S., Shajari, M.: Word sense disambiguation application in sentiment analysis of news headlines: an applied approach to forex market prediction. J. Intell. Inform. Syst. 52(1), 57–83 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Singh, T., Kumari, M.: Role of text pre-processing in twitter sentiment analysis. Proc. Comp. Sci. 89(Supplement C):549–554 (2016)

  40. Singh, T., Kumari, M., Gupta, D.S.: Real-time event detection and classification in social text steam using embedding. Clust. Comput. 25, (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-022-03610-6

  41. Stier, S., Bleier, A., Lietz, H., Strohmaier, M.: Election campaigning on social media: politicians, audiences, and the mediation of political communication on facebook and twitter. Polit. Commun. 35(1), 50–74 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wan, C.X., Li, B.: Financial causal sentence recognition based on BERT-CNN text classification. J. Supercomput. 78(5), 6503–6527 (2022)

  43. Xia, Y., Cambria, E., Hussain, A., Zhao, H.: Word polarity disambiguation using bayesian model and opinion-level features. Cogn. Comput. 7(3), 369–380 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Xu, J.: Does the medium matter? a meta-analysis on using social media vs. traditional media in crisis communication. Pub. Relat. Rev. 46(4):101947 (2020)

  45. Zhang, Z., Nie, J.Y., Wang, H.: Tjudem: a combination classifier for aspect category detection and sentiment polarity classification. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2015), pp. 772–777 (2015)

  46. Zhao, H., Liu, Z., Yao, X., Yang, Q.: A machine learning-based sentiment analysis of online product reviews with a novel term weighting and feature selection approach. Inform. Process. Manage. 58(5), 102656 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Zhou, Y., Lan, M., Wu, Y.: Ecnu at semeval-2017 task 4: Evaluating effective features on machine learning methods for twitter message polarity classification. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2017), pp. 812–816 (2017)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daya Sagar Gupta.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

There is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

singh, T., Kumari, M. & Gupta, D.S. Context-Based Persuasion Analysis of Sentiment Polarity Disambiguation in Social Media Text Streams. New Gener. Comput. 42, 497–531 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00354-023-00238-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00354-023-00238-x

Keywords

Navigation