Skip to main content
Log in

Reconsidering two-agent Nash implementation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Social Choice and Welfare Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we reconsider the full characterization of two-agent Nash implementation provided in the celebrated papers by Moore and Repullo (Econometrica 58:1083–1099, 1990) and Dutta and Sen (Rev Econ Stud 58:121–128, 1991), since we are able to show that the characterizing conditions are not logically independent. We prove that an amended version of the conditions proposed in these papers is still necessary and sufficient for Nash implementability. Then, by using our necessary and sufficient condition, we show that Maskin’s impossibility result can be avoided under restrictions on the outcomes and the domain of preferences much weaker than those previously imposed by Moore and Repullo (Econometrica 58:1083–1099, 1990) and Dutta and Sen (Rev Econ Stud 58:121–128, 1991).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dutta B, Sen A (1991) A necessary and sufficient condition for two-person Nash implementation. Rev Econ Stud 58: 121–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Maskin E (1999) Nash implementation and welfare optimality. Rev Econ Stud 66: 23–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Moore J, Repullo R (1990) Nash implementation: a full characterization. Econometrica 58: 1083–1099

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giulio Codognato.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Busetto, F., Codognato, G. Reconsidering two-agent Nash implementation. Soc Choice Welf 32, 171–179 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-008-0355-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-008-0355-3

Keywords

Navigation