Skip to main content
Log in

Minimum winning versus oversized coalitions in public finance: the role of uncertainty

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Social Choice and Welfare Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper extends Persson et al.’s (J Polit Econ 108:1121–1161, 2000) simple legislature in the context of public finance with certainty to uncertainty. In our uncertain world, oversized coalitions (OSCs) as well as minimum winning coalitions (MWCs) may arise in equilibrium, and the agenda setter’s proposed policy may fail to receive a majority support. This is in marked contrast to the certain world, in which only MWCs can arise in equilibrium and the agenda setter’s proposal never fails to pass. When OSCs arise, we show that both public good provision and redistribution are likely to achieve their first-best solution, even if the legislature is simple.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baron D, Ferejohn J (1989) Bargaining in legislatures. Am Polit Sci Rev 83: 1181–1206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron D, Diermeier D (2001) Elections, governments, and parliaments in proportional representation systems. Q J Econ 116: 933–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro R (1973) The control of politicians: an economic model. Public Choice 14: 19–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diermeier D, Merlo A (2000) Government turnover in parliamentary democracies. J Econ Theory 94: 46–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Druckman JN, Thies MF (2002) The importance of concurrence: the impact of bicameralism on government formation and duration. Am J Polit Sci 46: 760–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferejohn J (1986) Incumbent performance and electoral control. Public Choice 50: 5–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutz DS, Williams JR (1976) Minimum coalitions in legislatures: a review of the evidence. Sage Professional Papers, No. 04-028. Beverly Hills, Sage

  • Norman P (2002) Legislative bargaining and coalition formation. J Econ Theory 102: 322–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson T, Roland G, Tabellini G (2000) Comparative politics and public finance. J Polit Econ 108: 1121–1161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson T, Tabellini G (2000) Political economics: explaining economic policy. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker W (1962) The theory of political coalitions. Yale Unversity Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein A (1982) Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica 50: 97–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair B (1995) House special rules and the institutional design controversy. In: Shepsle K, Weingast B (eds) Positive theories of congressional institutions. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl I (1972) Bargaining theory. Economics Research Unit, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai T-S, Yang CC (2009) On majoritarian bargaining with incomplete information. Int Econ Rev (in press).

  • Uslaner E (1975) Partisanship and coalition formation in Congress. Political Methodol 2: 381–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingast B (1979) A rational choice perspective on congressional norms. Am J Polit Sci 23: 245–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tsung-Sheng Tsai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tsai, TS., Yang, C.C. Minimum winning versus oversized coalitions in public finance: the role of uncertainty. Soc Choice Welf 34, 345–361 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-009-0400-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-009-0400-x

Keywords

Navigation