Abstract
This paper studies the problem of partnership dissolution in the context of asymmetric information. Past work shows that the initial share allocation, interdependence of partners’ valuations, and asymmetric control all affect the possibility of efficient dissolution. In this paper, I show, in a novel class of “cooperative” partnerships characterized by ex ante interdependence of valuations, that effectiveness is significantly more important than the initial share allocation. Intuitively, as the effectiveness of cooperation between partners (and thus partnership value) increases, the gains from dissolving decrease but the informational rents remain constant, so efficient dissolution is more difficult to achieve. For sufficiently high effectiveness, efficient dissolution is impossible for any initial share allocation. For sufficiently low effectiveness, however, efficient dissolution is possible for all initial share allocations. The possibility of efficient bargaining depends on the initial share allocation only for moderately effective partnerships.
Access this article
We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brooks R, Landeo C, Spier K (2010) Trigger happy or gun shy? Dissolving common-value partnerships with Texas shootouts. RAND J Econ 41: 649–673
Chien H-K (2007) Incentive efficient mechanisms for partnership dissolution (manuscript)
Cramton P, Gibbons R, Klemperer P (1987) Dissolving a partnership efficiently. Econometrica 55: 615–632
d’Aspremont C, Gérard-Varet L-A (1979) Incentives and incomplete information. J Public Econ 11: 25–45
De Frutos MA, Kittsteiner T (2008) Efficient partnership dissolution under buy/sell clauses. RAND J Econ 39: 184–199
Engers M, McManus B (2007) Charity auctions. Int Econ Rev 48: 953–994
Englebrecht-Wiggans R (1994) Auctions with price-proportional benefits to bidders. Games Econ Behav 6: 339–346
Farrell J, Scotchmer S (1988) Partnerships. Q J Econ 103: 279–297
Fieseler K, Kittsteiner T, Moldovanu B (2003) Partnerships, lemons and efficient trade. J Econ Theory 113: 223–234
Goeree J, Maasland E, Onderstal S, Turner JL (2005) How (not) to raise money. J Political Econ 113: 897–918
Hauswald R, Hege U (2003) Ownership and control in joint ventures: theory and evidence. Discussion Paper 4056. CEPR, Washington, DC
Holmström B (1982) Moral hazard in teams. Bell J Econ 13: 324–340
Jehiel P, Pauzner A (2006) Partnership dissolution with interdependent values. RAND J Econ 37: 1–22
Kittsteiner T (2003) Partnerships and double auctions with interdependent valuations. Games Econ Behav 44:54–76
Krishna V, Perry M (2000) Efficient mechanism design (mimeo)
Legros P, Matthews SA (1993) Efficient and nearly-efficient partnerships. Rev Econ Stud 60(3): 599–611
Lengwiler Y, Wolfstetter E (2005) On some auction rules for amicable divorce in equal shares partnerships. In: Beschorner T, Eger T (eds) Das Ethische in der konomie. Festschrift fr Hans Nutzinger, Metropolis Verlag, pp 199–212
Levin S, Tadelis J (2005) Profit-sharing and the role of professional partnerships. Q J Econ 120: 131–171
Li J, Wolfstetter E (2010) Partnership dissolution, complementarity, and investment incentives. Oxf Econ Pap 62: 529–552
Makowski L, Mezzetti C (1994) Bayesian and weakly robust first best mechanisms: characterizations. J Econ Theory 64: 500–519
Matouschek N (2004) Ex post inefficiencies in a property rights theory of the firm. J Law Econ Organ 20: 125–147
McAfee RP (1992) Amicable divorce. J Econ Theory 56: 266–293
Moldovanu B (2002) How to dissolve a partnership. J Inst Theor Econ 158: 66–80
Myerson RB, Satterthwaite M (1983) Efficient mechanisms for bilateral trading. J Econ Theory 29: 265–281
Ornelas E, Turner JL (2007) Efficient dissolution of partnerships and the structure of control. Games Econ Behav 60: 187–199
Segal I, Whinston M (2011) A simple status quo that assures participation (with application to efficient bargaining). Theor Econ 6: 109–125
Singh R (1998) Takeover bids with toeholds: The case of the owner’s curse. Rev Financ Stud 11: 679–704
Turner JL (2011) Dissolving (in)effective partnerships. Working paper, Sep 2011
Williams SR (1999) A characterization of efficient, Bayesian incentive compatible mechanisms. Econ Theory 14: 155–180
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Turner, J.L. Dissolving (in)effective partnerships. Soc Choice Welf 41, 321–335 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-012-0690-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-012-0690-2