Abstract
Electing a committee introduces constraints beyond excellence, such as ensuring a balance of gender, tenure, talent, and other characteristics. The difficulties are captured by an actual example where every voter desired gender diversity on a committee and voted accordingly, but only men were elected. After developing the properties of certain methods that avoid these problems, other needs in this area are described.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
This is not hypothetical; when one of us (DGS) tallied CMC ballots for two different years, it was clear that some voters had adopted this strategic voting behavior.
References
Barberà S, Sonnenschein H, Zhou L (1991) Voting by committees. Econometrica 59:595–609
Barberà S, Massó J, Neme A (2005) Voting by committees under constraints. J Econ Theory 122:185–205
Chamberlin JR, Courant PN (1983) Representative deliberations and representative decisions: proportional representation and the Borda rule. Am Polit Sci Rev 77:718–733
Dodgson CL, Abeles FF (2011) The pamphlets of Lewis Carroll. In: Carroll L, Abeles F (eds) The political pamphlets and letters of Charles Lutwidge Dodgson and related pieces: a mathematical approach. Lewis Carroll Society of North America, New York
Fréchette G, Maniquet F, Morelli M (2008) Incumbents interests and gender quotas. Am J Polit Sci 52:891–909
Gehrlein WV (2002) Condorcet’s paradox and the likelihood of its occurrence: different perspectives on balanced preferences. Theory Decis 52:171–199
Ratliff TC (2006) Selecting committees. Public Choice 126:343–355
Ratliff TC (2001) A comparison of Dodgson’s method and Kemeny’s rule. Soc Choice Welf 18:79–89
Ratliff TC (2002) A comparison of Dodgson’s method and the Borda count. Econ Theory 20:357–372
Ratliff TC (2003) Some startling inconsistencies when electing committees. Soc Choice Welf 2003:433–454
Saari DG (1995) Basic geometry of voting. Springer, New York
Saari DG (2006) Proposal for a change in class V voting rules. Econ Theory 28:265–281
Saari DG (2008) Disposing dictators, demystifying voting paradoxes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Acknowledgments
Saari’s research was partly supported by a research Grant NSF CMMI-1016785. Our thanks to the referees and an Associate Editor for several useful suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ratliff, T.C., Saari, D.G. Complexities of electing diverse committees. Soc Choice Welf 43, 55–71 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-013-0773-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-013-0773-8