Skip to main content
Log in

Majority voting solution concepts and redistributive taxation

  • Published:
Social Choice and Welfare Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Strong assumptions are usually needed to guarantee the existence of a Condorcet winner in majority voting games. The theoretical literature has developed various solution concepts to accommodate the general absence of Condorcet winner, but very little is known on their economic implications. In this paper, I select three such concepts (the uncovered set, the bipartisan set and the minmax set), defined as game-theoretical solution concepts applied to a Downsian electoral competition game. These concepts are then computed by means of simulations in a simple model of purely redistributive taxation, where factor supply varies with net factor rewards. All three concepts give rather sharp predictions and are not too sensitive to small variations of the preference profiles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 29 December 1997/Accepted: 26 August 1999

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Donder, P. Majority voting solution concepts and redistributive taxation. Soc Choice Welfare 17, 601–627 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s003550000044

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s003550000044

Keywords