Skip to main content
Log in

Minimum Tree Cost Quartet Puzzling

  • Published:
Journal of Classification Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a new distance based quartet method for phylogenetic tree reconstruction, called Minimum Tree Cost Quartet Puzzling. Starting from a distance matrix computed from natural data, the algorithm incrementally constructs a tree by adding one taxon at a time to the intermediary tree using a cost function based on the relaxed 4-point condition for weighting quartets. Different input orders of taxa lead to trees having distinct topologies which can be evaluated using a maximum likelihood or weighted least squares optimality criterion. Using reduced sets of quartets and a simple heuristic tree search strategy we obtain an overall complexity of O(n 5 log2 n) for the algorithm. We evaluate the performances of the method through comparative tests and show that our method outperforms NJ when a weighted least squares optimality criterion is employed. We also discuss the theoretical boundaries of the algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BANDELT, H., and DRESS, A. (1992), “Split Decomposition: A New and Useful Approach to Phylogenetic Analysis of Distance Data”, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 1, 242–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BANDELT, H. J., and DRESS, A. (1986), “Reconstructing the Shape of a Tree from Observed Dissimilarity Data”, Advances in Applied Mathematics, 7, 309–343.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • BERRY, V., and GASCUEL, O. (2000), “Inferring Evolutionary Trees with Strong Combinatorial Evidence”, Theoretical Computer Science, 240, 271–298.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • BERRY, V., JIANG, T., KEARNEY, P., LI, M., and WAREHAM, T. (1999), “Quartet Cleaning: Improved Algorithms and Simulations”, in ESA ’99: Proceedings of the 7th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms, London UK: Springer-Verlag, pp. 313–324.

  • BUNEMAN, P. (1971), “The Recovery of Trees from Measures of Dissimilarity”, Mathematics in the Archaeological and Historical Sciences, 387–395.

  • CILIBRASI, R., and VITANYI, P. (2005), “A New Quartet Tree Heuristic for Hierarchical Clustering”, in Principled Methods of Trading Exploration and Exploitation Workshop, London UK.

  • ERD ÖS, P., STEEL, M., SZ´EKELY, L. A., and WARNOW, T. (1997), “Constructing Big Trees from Short Sequences”, in Automata, Languages and Programming, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1256, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag, pp. 827–837.

  • FELSENSTEIN, J. (1981), “Evolutionary Trees from DNA Sequences: A Maximum Likelihood Approach”, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 17, 368–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • FELSENSTEIN, J. (1997), “An Alternating Least Squares Approach to Inferring Phylogenies from Pairwise Distances”, Systematic Biology, 46, 101–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • FELSENSTEIN, J. (2005), PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) Version 3.6, distributed by the author, Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle.

  • FITCH,W. (1981), “A Non-sequential Method for Constructing Trees and Hierarchical Classifications”, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 18, 30–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • GASCUEL, O. (1997), “BIONJ: An Improved Version of the NJ Algorithm Based on a Simple Model of Sequence Data”, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 14, 685–695.

    Google Scholar 

  • GRAMM, J., and NIEDERMEIER, R. (2003), “A Fixed-parameter Algorithm for Minimum Quartet Inconsistency”, Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 67, 723–741.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • HOLLAND, B., HUBER, K., DRESS, A., and MOULTON, V. (2002), “δ Plots: A Tool for Analyzing Phylogenetic Distance Data”, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 19, 2051–2059.

    Google Scholar 

  • HUSON, D., SMITH, K., and WARNOW, T. (1999), “Estimating Large Distances in Phylogenetic Reconstruction”, in Algorithm Engineering, eds. J. Vitter and C. Zaroliagis, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1668, London UK: Springer-Verlag, pp. 271–285.

  • JIANG, T., KEARNEY, P., and LI, M. (1998), “Orchestrating Quartets: Approximation and Data Correction”, in FOCS ’98: Proceedings of the 39th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, IEEE Computer Society, Washington DC, USA, p. 416.

  • JUKES, T. H., and CANTOR, C. R. (1969), Evolution of Protein Molecules, NewYork: Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • KEARNEY, P. (1998), “The Ordinal Quartet Method”, in RECOMB ’98: Proceedings of the Second Annual International Conference on Computational molecular biology, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 125–134.

  • MARGUSH, T., and MCMORRIS, F. R. (1981), “Consensus n-Trees”, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 42, 239–244.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • RAMBAUT, A., and GRASS, N. (1997), “Seq-Gen: An Application for the Monte Carlo Simulation of DNA Sequence Evolution Along Phylogenetic Trees”, Computer Applications in the Biosciences, 13, 235–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • RANWEZ, V., and GASCUEL, O. (2001), “Quartet Based Phylogenetic Inference: Improvements and Limits”, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 18, 1103–1116.

    Google Scholar 

  • ROBINSON, D., and FOULDS, L. (1981), “Comparison of Phylogenetic Trees”, Mathematical Biosciences, 53, 131–147.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • SAITOU, N., and NEI, M. (1987), “The Neighbor-joining Method: A New Method for Reconstructing Phylogenetic Trees”, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 4, 406–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • SATTATH, S., and TVERSKY, A. (1977), “Additive Similarity Trees”, Psychometrika, 42, 319–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SCHMIDT, H., STRIMMER, K., VINGRON, M., and VON HAESELER, A. (2002), “TREE-PUZZLE:Maximum Likelihood Phylogenetic Analysis Using Quartets and Parallel Computing”, Bioinformatics, 18, 502–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SFORZA, C., and EDWARDS, A. (1967), “Phylogenetic Analysis: Models and Estimation Procedures”, American Journal of Human Genetics, 19, 223–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • SNIR, S., WARNOW, T., and RAO, S. (2007), “Short Quartet Puzzling: A New Quartet-Based Phylogeny Reconstruction Algorithm”, Journal of Computational Biology, 15, 91–103.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • ST. JOHN, K.,WARNOW, T.,MORET, B., and VAWTER, L. (2003), “Performance Study of Phylogenetic Methods: (Unweighted) Quartet Methods and Neighbor-joining”, Journal of Algorithms, 48, 173–193.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • STEEL, M. (1992), “The Complexity of Reconstructing Trees from Qualitative Characters and Subtrees”, Journal of Classification, 9, 91–116.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • STRIMMER, K., and VON HAESELER, A. (1996), “Quartet Puzzling: A Quartet Maximum-Likelihood Method for Reconstructing Tree Topologies”, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 13, 964–969.

    Google Scholar 

  • VINH, L., and VON HAESELER, A. (2004), “IQPNNI: Moving Fast Through Tree Space and Stopping in Time”, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 21, 1565–1571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WU, G., YOU, J., and LIN, G. (2006), “A Polynomial Algorithm for the Minimum Quartet Inconsistency Problem with O(n) Quartet Errors”, Information Processing Letters, 100, 167–171.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tudor B. Ionescu.

Additional information

We would like to thank the editor and two anonymous referees for useful comments on earlier versions of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ionescu, T.B., Polaillon, G. & Boulanger, F. Minimum Tree Cost Quartet Puzzling. J Classif 27, 136–157 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00357-010-9053-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00357-010-9053-9

Keywords

Navigation