Skip to main content
Log in

Automated symmetry exploitation in engineering analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In engineering analysis, geometric symmetry, when exploited, has two potential benefits: (1) it can significantly reduce the computational time, and (2) it can simultaneously improve the accuracy of the computed solution. Consequently, most CAD/CAE systems have standard ‘provisions’ for exploiting symmetry. These provisions are however inadequate in that they needlessly burden the design engineer with time consuming and error-prone tasks of: (1) symmetry detection, (2) symmetry cell construction, (3) boundary mapping and (4) symmetry reduction. In this paper, we propose a framework for automated symmetry exploitation in engineering analysis. By formalizing all four tasks listed above, and by unifying them under a single framework, we show how automated symmetry exploitation can be achieved. We discuss implementations of the proposed work within two commercially available CAD/CAE systems, namely FEMLABTM and SolidWorksTM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

Notes

  1. Note that mr represents a rotation followed by a vertical mirror transformation. This is equivalent to a mirror operation about a line 120° to the vertical. Similarly, mr 2 represents mirror about a 240° line.

References

  1. Wohlever JC (1999) Some computational aspects of a group theoretic finite element approach to the buckling and postbuckling analysis of plates and shells-of-revolution. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 170:373–406

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Mohan SJ, Pratap R (2002) A group theoretic approach to the linear free vibration analysis of shells with dihedral symmetry. J Sound Vib 252(2):317–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bossavit A (1986) Symmetry, groups, and boundary value problems. A progressive introduction to noncommutative harmonic analysis of partial differential equations in domains with geometrical symmetry. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 56:167–215

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Burns G (1977) Introduction to group theory with applications, 1st edn. Academic, New York, p 429

  5. Dinkevich S (1991) Finite symmetric systems and their analysis. Int J Solids Struct 27(10):1215–1253

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Evensen DA (1976) Vibration analysis of multi-symmetric structures. AIAA J 14(4):446–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kangwai RD, Guest SD, Pellegrino S (1999) An introduction to the analysis of symmetric structures. Comput Struct 71:671–688

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Kangwai RD, Guest SD (2000) Symmetry-adapted equilibrium matrices. Int J Solids Struct 37:1525–1548

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Zlokovic GM (1989) Group theory and G-vector spaces in structural analysis, 1st edn. In: Evans R (ed) Ellis Horwood series in civil engineering. Wiley, New York, p 283

  10. FEMLAB, A multi-physics modeling and simulation package; Version 3.0a. 2003, COMSOL

  11. SolidWorks, SolidWorks: A 3-D CAD environment. 2005, http://www.solidworks.com

  12. Cook RD, Malkus DS, Plesha ME (1989) Concepts and applications of finite element analysis. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Allgower EL, Aston PJ (1996) Symmetry reductions for the numerical solution of boundary value problems. Lect Appl Mech 32:29–47

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Hill VE (1975) Groups, representations and characters, 1st edn. Hafner Press, New York, p 181

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Martin RR, Dutta D (1996) Tools for asymmetry rectification in shape design. J Syst Eng 6:98–112

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tate SJ, Jared GEM (2003) Recognising symmetry in solid models. Comput Aided Des 35:673–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wolter JD, Woo TC, Volz RA (1985) Optimal algorithms for symmetry detection in two and three dimensions. Vis Comput 1:37–48

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Suresh K (2004) Automated symmetry exploitation in engineering analysis. In: Proceedings of design engineering technical conference, Salt Lake, Utah

  19. Rosenthal JW, Murphy GM (1936) Group theory and the vibrations of polyatomic molecules. Rev Mod Phys 8(4):317–346

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee W, Chen K (1986) A general method to calculate all irreducible representations of a finite group. J Phys A Math Gen 19:2935–2946

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Krishnan Suresh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suresh, K., Sirpotdar, A. Automated symmetry exploitation in engineering analysis. Engineering with Computers 21, 304–311 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-006-0021-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-006-0021-2

Keywords