Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Performance of a flying cross bar to incapacitate a long-rod penetrator based on a finite element model

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Performance of a flying cross bar, instead of the flying plate, to incapacitate the long-rod penetrator, has been evaluated numerically based on a finite element model. The length to diameter ratio, L/D, of the penetrator was 30 and the velocity was 2.0 km/s. The length of the cross bar was fixed to 0.5L and the velocity of the bar was determined from its mass and given kinetic energy. The bar was assumed to impact the mid point of the penetrator at 45° of obliquity. The efficiency of flying cross bar is maximum when the diameter of the bar is in the range between 1D and 4D depending on the energy of the bar and the distance to witness block. The protection capability of the bar has been discussed in terms of the shape and lateral displacement of the disturbed penetrator by the flying cross bar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Hitting the midpoint of the penetrator would be rare in practical situation; The cases of hitting other points will be the subject of a future work.

  2. In Table 3, the decrease of velocity after the impact is so small; The velocity ratio (V/V o) of 0.97~0.99 may be within the margin of errors.

References

  1. Liden E, Johansson B, Lundberg B (2006) Effect of thin oblique moving plates on long rod projectiles: A reverse impact study. Int J Impact Eng 32:1696–1720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shin H, Yoo Y-H (2003) Effect of the velocity of a single flying plate on the protection capability against obliquely impacting long rod penetrators. Combust Explos Shock Waves 39:591–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yoo Y-H, Shin H (2004) Protection capability of dual flying plates against obliquely impacting long rod penetrators. Int J Impact Eng 30:55–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Paik SH, Kim S-J, Yoo Y-H, Lee M (2007) Protection performance of dual flying oblique plate against yawed long rod. Int J Impact Eng 34:1413–1422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McIntosh G, Szymczak M (2002) Ballistic protection possibilities for a light armoured vehicle. In: Proceedings of the 20th international symposium on ballistics, Orlando, FL, USA, pp 23-27

  6. Sterzelmeier K, Brommer V, Sinninger L (2001) Active armor protection—concept and design of steerable launcher systems fed by modular pulsed-power supply units. IEEE Trans Magnetics 37:238–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee W, Lee H-J, Shin H (2002) Ricochet of a tungsten heavy alloy long-rod projectile from deformable steel plates. J Phys D Appl Phys 35:2676–2686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shin H, Lee W (2003) Interactions of impact shock waves in a thin-walled explosive container, part I: impacts by a flat-ended projectile. Combust Explos Shock Waves 39:470–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shin H, Lee W (2003) Interactions of impact shock waves in a thin-walled explosive container, part II: impact by a cone-nosed projectile. Combust Explos Shock Waves 39:479–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shin H, Lee W (2003) Material design guidelines for explosive confinements to control impact shock-induced detonations based on shock transmission/reflection analysis. Int J Impact Eng 8:465–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liden E, Andersson O, Tjernberg A (2007) Influence of side-impacting dynamic armour components on long rod projectiles. In: Proceedings of the 23rd international symposium on ballistics, Tarragona, Spain, pp 16–20

  12. Johnson GR, Cook WH (1983) A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rated, and high temperatures. In: Proceedings of the 17th international symposium on ballistics, Hague, Netherlands, pp 541–47

  13. Liden E, Ottosson J, Holmberg L (1996) WHA long rods penetrating stationary and moving oblique steel plates. In: Proceedings of the 16th international symposium on ballistics, San Francisco, CA, USA, pp 703–11

  14. Hallquist JO (2006) LS-DYNA Theory Manual. Livermore Software Technology Corporation, Livermore

    Google Scholar 

  15. Anderson CE Jr, Walker JD, Parton SJ, Bless Y (1996) On the L/D effect for long-rod penetrators. Int J Impact Eng 18:247–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Anderson CE Jr, Walker JD, Bless SJ, Sharron TR (1995) On the velocity dependence of the L/D effect for long-rod penetrators. Int J Impact Eng 17:13–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the MEST (2010-0004150).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyunho Shin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yoo, YH., Paik, S.H., Kim, JB. et al. Performance of a flying cross bar to incapacitate a long-rod penetrator based on a finite element model. Engineering with Computers 29, 409–415 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-012-0257-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-012-0257-y

Keywords

Navigation