Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Evaluation of effect of rock mass properties on fragmentation using robust techniques

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the civil and mining projects, blasting operation is important from technical and economical point of view. There are several parameters which affect the result of operation such as desired fragmentation and undesired phenomena, e.g., ground vibration, fly rock, etc. From these parameters, rock mass characterizations can be considered as more influential as compared to the blasting pattern. In other words, it can be said that pattern specifications should primarily be designed according to the rock mass properties to reach the main objective of the operation, i.e., rock fragmentation. Complex nature of the problem needs to implement robust approaches such as artificial intelligence-based techniques. In this paper, an attempt has been made to develop some models by which the impact of each and every parameter influencing the result of blasting operation can be evaluated. For this research work, 432 datasets from 14 mines situated in the different parts of the world has been collected. In developing of the models, 19 parameters such as uniaxial compressive strength, tensile strength, brittleness, Point Load Index, Young’s modulus, Poisson’s ratio, rock quality designation, cohesion, friction angle, burden, spacing and stemming were incorporated. Regression analysis, decision tree and artificial neural network methods were employed for developing the models for predicting fragmentation. Determination coefficient (R2) for artificial neural network modeling, multivariate linear regression and decision tree was computed 0.98, 0.83 and 0.45, respectively, showing accuracy of network modeling over the other applied methods. In addition, it was revealed that the most influential parameters on fragmentation are Point Load Index, uniaxial compressive strength, Poisson’s ratio, cohesion and rock quality designation, respectively, and the least effective ones are stemming, spacing and hole diameter, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Armaghani DJ, Hajihassani M, Mohamad ET, Marto A, Noorani S (2014) Blasting-induced flyrock and ground vibration prediction through an expert artificial neural network based on particle swarm optimization. Arabian J Geosci 7(12):5383–5396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Khandelwal M, Monjezi M (2013) Prediction of backbreak in open-pit blasting operations using the machine learning method. Rock Mech Rock Eng 46(2):389–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Monjezi M, Khoshalan HA, Varjani AY (2012) Prediction of flyrock and backbreak in open pit blasting operation: a neuro-genetic approach. Arab J Geosci 5(3):441–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Görgülü K, Arpaz E, Demirci A, Koçaslan A, Dilmaç MK, Yüksek AG (2013) Investigation of blast-induced ground vibrations in the Tülü boron open pit mine. Bull Eng Geol Environ 72(3–4):555–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hajihassani M, Armaghani DJ, Marto A, Mohamad ET (2015) Ground vibration prediction in quarry blasting through an artificial neural network optimized by imperialist competitive algorithm. Bull Eng Geol Environ 74(3):873–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Raina A, Murthy V, Soni A (2014) Flyrock in bench blasting: a comprehensive review. Bull Eng Geol Environ 73(4):1199–1209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Michaux S, Djordjevic N (2005) Influence of explosive energy on the strength of the rock fragments and SAG mill throughput. Miner Eng 18(4):439–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Monjezi M, Rezaei M, Varjani AY (2009) Prediction of rock fragmentation due to blasting in Gol-E-Gohar iron mine using fuzzy logic. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46(8):1273–1280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Thornton D, Kanchibotla S, Brunton I (2002) Modelling the impact of rockmass and blast design variation on blast fragmentation. Fragblast 6(2):169–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhu Z, Mohanty B, Xie H (2007) Numerical investigation of blasting-induced crack initiation and propagation in rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 44(3):412–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Atici U (2011) Prediction of the strength of mineral admixture concrete using multivariable regression analysis and an artificial neural network. Expert Syst Appl 38(8):9609–9618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mohamad ET, Hajihassani M, Armaghani DJ, Marto A (2012) Simulation of blasting-induced air overpressure by means of artificial neural networks. Int Rev Modell Simul 5:2501–2506

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mohamad ET, Armaghani DJ, Momeni E, Abad SVANK (2015) Prediction of the unconfined compressive strength of soft rocks: a PSO-based ANN approach. Bull Eng Geol Environ 74(3):745–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Armaghani DJ, Hajihassani M, Bejarbaneh BY, Marto A, Mohamad ET (2014) Indirect measure of shale shear strength parameters by means of rock index tests through an optimized artificial neural network. Measurement 55:487–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Asl PF, Monjezi M, Hamidi JK, Armaghani DJ (2017) Optimization of flyrock and rock fragmentation in the Tajareh limestone mine using metaheuristics method of firefly algorithm. Eng Computers:1–11

  16. Trippi RR, Turban E (1992) Neural networks in finance and investing: using artificial intelligence to improve real world performance. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Abbassi A, Bahar L (2005) Application of neural network for the modeling and control of evaporative condenser cooling load. Appl Therm Eng 25(17):3176–3186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kosko B (1992) Neural networks and fuzzy systems: a dynamical systems approach to machine intelligence/book and disk, vol 1. Prentice hall, Upper Saddle River

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Peisheng L, Youhui X, Dunxi Y, Xuexin S (2005) Prediction of grindability with multivariable regression and neural network in Chinese coal. Fuel 84(18):2384–2388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Simpson PK (1990) Artificial neural systems: foundations, paradigms, applications, and implementations. Pergamon 1:34–36

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tambe SS, Deshpande PB, Kulkarni BD, Ramani S (1996) Elements of artificial neural networks with selected applications in chemical engineering, and chemical & biological sciences. Simul Adv Controls Inc 1:56–61

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wasserman PD (1989) Neural computing. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. Anderson JA (1995) An introduction to neural networks. MIT press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Chauvin Y, Rumelhart DE (1995) Backpropagation: theory, architectures, and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  25. Neaupane KM, Achet SH (2004) Use of backpropagation neural network for landslide monitoring: a case study in the higher Himalaya. Eng Geol 74(3):213–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Monjezi M, Mehrdanesh A, Malek A, Khandelwal M (2013) Evaluation of effect of blast design parameters on flyrock using artificial neural networks. Neural Comput Applic 23(2):349–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Adel G, Kojovic T, Thornton D (2006) Mine-to-mill optimization of aggregate production. Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, Blacksburg

    Google Scholar 

  28. Akbari M, Lashkaripour G, Bafghi AY, Ghafoori M (2015) Blastability evaluation for rock mass fragmentation in Iran central iron ore mines. Int J Min Sci Technol 25(1):59–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Aler J, Du Mouza J, Arnould M Measurement of the fragmentation efficiency of rock mass blasting and its mining applications (1996) Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr. 2: 125–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hudaverdi T (2004) The investigation of the optimum parameters in large scale blasting at KBI Black Sea Copper Works—Murgul open-pit mine. Istanbul Technical University, Maslak pp 45–67

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hudaverdi T, Kulatilake P, Kuzu C (2011) Prediction of blast fragmentation using multivariate analysis procedures. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 35(12):1318–1333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Jhanwar J, Jethwa J, Reddy A (2000) Influence of air-deck blasting on fragmentation in jointed rocks in an open-pit manganese mine. Eng Geol 57(1):13–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kulatilake P, Qiong W, Hudaverdi T, Kuzu C (2010) Mean particle size prediction in rock blast fragmentation using neural networks. Eng Geol 114(3):298–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Monjezi M, Ahmadi Z, Varjani AY, Khandelwal M (2013) Backbreak prediction in the Chadormalu iron mine using artificial neural network. Neural Comput Applic 23(3–4):1101–1107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ouchterlony F, Niklasson B, Abrahamsson S Fragmentation monitoring of production blasts at MRICA. In: International Symposium on Rock Fragmentation by Blasting: 26/08/1990-31/08/1990, 1990. The Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, pp 283–289

  36. Ozcelik Y (1998) Effect of discontinuities on fragment size distribution in open-pit blasting: a case study. Transactions-Institution of Mining and Metallurgy Section. A Mining Industry 107 (SEPDEC)

  37. Rezaei M, Monjezi M, Moghaddam SG, Farzaneh F (2012) Burden prediction in blasting operation using rock geomechanical properties. Arab J Geosci 5(5):1031–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Shams S, Monjezi M, Majd VJ, Armaghani DJ (2015) Application of fuzzy inference system for prediction of rock fragmentation induced by blasting. Arab J Geosci 8(12):10819–10832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Gokceoglu C, Zorlu K (2004) A fuzzy model to predict the uniaxial compressive strength and the modulus of elasticity of a problematic rock. Eng Appl Artif Intell 17(1):61–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Grima MA, Verhoef P (1999) Forecasting rock trencher performance using fuzzy logic. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 36(4):413–432

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kiers HA, Rasson J-P, Groenen PJ, Schader M (2012) Data analysis, classification, and related methods. GmbH & Co. K, Springer-Verlag Berlin and Heidelberg

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Beniwal S, Arora J (2012) Classification and feature selection techniques in data mining. Int J Eng Res Technol 1(6):2278–2284

    Google Scholar 

  43. Stasis AC, Loukis E, Pavlopoulos S, Koutsouris D Using decision tree algorithms as a basis for a heart sound diagnosis decision support system. Information Technology Applications in Biomedicine, 2003. 4th International IEEE EMBS Special Topic Conference on, 2003. IEEE, pp 354–357

  44. Loh WY (2011) Classification and regression trees. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Data Min Knowl Discov 1 (1):14–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Breiman L, Friedman J, Stone CJ, Olshen RA (1984) Classification and regression trees. Wadsworth, Belmont, Calif

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Chen G, Fu K, Liang Z, Sema T, Li C, Tontiwachwuthikul P, Idem R (2014) The genetic algorithm based back propagation neural network for MMP prediction in CO 2-EOR process. Fuel 126:202–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran

    Amirhossein Mehrdanesh, Masoud Monjezi & Ahmad Reza Sayadi

Authors
  1. Amirhossein Mehrdanesh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Masoud Monjezi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ahmad Reza Sayadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masoud Monjezi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mehrdanesh, A., Monjezi, M. & Sayadi, A.R. Evaluation of effect of rock mass properties on fragmentation using robust techniques. Engineering with Computers 34, 253–260 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-017-0537-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-017-0537-7

Keywords