Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

A gravitational approach to modeling the representative volume geometry of particle-reinforced metal matrix composites

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Computational models of representative volumes of metal matrix composites are crucial for investigating material behavior on the microscale. Numerical simulations often employ finite element models of representative volumes. Such models are based on observations of material microstructural properties, for example, by means of electron microscopy. Constructing a geometrical model of a representative volume for further computations can be a tedious task. This paper presents a new approach to creating geometrical models of this kind. The approach is based on the simulation of rigid body motion in a gravitational field and allows one to automatically generate geometrical models of representative volumes. The approach capabilities are exemplified by two geometrical models of representative volume. One model describes a metal matrix composite with high volume fraction of prismatic reinforcement particles, produced by liquid metal infiltration. The other model describes a metal matrix composite with high volume fraction of metal pellets, produced by powder metallurgy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Peters S (2013) Handbook of composites. Springer, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chawla K (2012) Composite materials: science and engineering. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Xue-bin L, Hua-min Z, Chun Z, Chao S (2000) A study of residual stress field in whisker reinforced metallic composite by using 3-D FEM. Wuhan Univ J Nat Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02828306

    Google Scholar 

  4. Su Y, Ouyang Q, Zhang W et al (2014) Composite structure modeling and mechanical behavior of particle reinforced metal matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng A. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2014.01.024

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schoutens JE (1984) Simple and precise measurements of fibre volume and void fractions in metal matrix composite materials. J Mater Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00540466

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lee WJ, Kim YJ, Kang NH, Park IM, Park YH (2011) Finite-element modeling of the particle clustering effect in a powder-metallurgy-processed ceramic-particle-reinforced metal matrix composite on its mechanical properties. Mech Compos Mater. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11029-011-9177-y

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mishnaevsky L (2007) Computational experiments in the mechanics of materials: concepts and tools. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Umer U, Ashfaq M, Qudeiri JA et al (2015) Modeling machining of particle-reinforced aluminum-based metal matrix composites using cohesive zone elements. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6715-5

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gusev AA (1997) Representative volume element size for elastic composites: a numerical study. J Mech Phys Solids. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5096(97)00016-1

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Ayyar A, Chawla N (2007) Three-dimensional (3D) microstructure-based modeling of crack growth in particle reinforced composites. J Mat Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-007-2010-2

    Google Scholar 

  11. Williams J, Segurado J, LLorca J, Chawla N (2012) Three dimensional (3D) microstructure-based modeling of interfacial decohesion in particle reinforced metal matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng A. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2012.05.108

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hill R (1963) Elastic properties of reinforced solids: some theoretical principles. J Mech Phys Solids 11:357–372

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Ostoja-Starzewski M (2006) Material spatial randomness: from statistical to representative volume element. Probab Eng Mech 21:112–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Drugan WJ, Willis JR (1996) A micromechanics-based nonlocal constitutive equation and estimates of representative volume element size for elastic composites. J Mech Phys Solids 44(4):497–524

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Coffman VR, Reid ACE, Langer SA, Dogan G (2013) OOF3D: an image-based finite element solver for materials science. Appl Imaging Tech Mech Mater Struct. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9796-8_47

    Google Scholar 

  16. 3D Image Processing: https://www.synopsys.com/simpleware.html. Accessed 11 Oct 2018

  17. Han W, Eckschlager A, Böhm HJ (2001) The effects of three-dimensional multi-particle arrangements on the mechanical behavior and damage initiation of particle-reinforced MMCs. Compos Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00061-6

    Google Scholar 

  18. Böhm HJ, Han W (2001) Comparisons between three-dimensional and two-dimensional multi-particle unit cell models for particle reinforced metal matrix composites. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/9/2/301

    Google Scholar 

  19. Eckschlager A, Han W, Böhm HJ (2002) A unit cell model for brittle fracture of particles embedded in a ductile matrix. Comput Mater Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-0256(02)00252-5

    Google Scholar 

  20. Segurado J, Gonzalez C, LLorca J (2003) A numerical investigation of the effect of particle clustering on the mechanical properties of composites. Acta Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00043-0

    Google Scholar 

  21. Qian Z, Garboczi EJ, Ye G, Schlangen E (2016) Anm: a geometrical model for the composite structure of mortar and concrete using real shape particles. MaterStruct 49:149–158

    Google Scholar 

  22. Böhm HJ, Eckschlager A, Han W (2002) Multi-inclusion unit cell models for metal matrix composites with randomly oriented discontinuous reinforcements. Comp Mater Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-0256(02)00248-3

    Google Scholar 

  23. Atkins SL, Gibeling JC (1995) A finite element model of the effects of primary creep in an Al-SiC metal matrix composite. Metall Mater Trans A. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02669437

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fritzen F, Böhlke T (2011) Periodic three-dimensional mesh generation for particle reinforced composites with application to metal matrix composites. Int J Solids Struct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.11.010

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Bagi K (1993) A quasi-static numerical model for micro-level analysis of granular assemblies. Mech Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6636(93)90032-M

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hitti K, Laure P, Coupez T, Silva L, Bernacki M (2012) Precise generation of complex statistical Representative Volume Elements (RVEs) in a finite element context. Comp Mater Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.04.011

    Google Scholar 

  27. Buryachenko VA, Jackson T, Amadio G (2012) Modeling of random bimodal structures of composites (application to solid propellant): I. simulation of random packs. Comput Model Eng Sci 85(5):379–416

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jia X, Williams RA (1001) A packing algorithm for particles of arbitrary shape. Powder Technol 120:175–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Burtseva L, Salas BV, Romero R, Werner F (2016) Recent advances on modelling of structures of multi-component mixtures using a sphere packing approach. Int J Nanotech. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJNT.2016.074522

    Google Scholar 

  30. Woodcock NH, Naylor MA (1983) Randomness testing in threedimensional orientation data. J Struct Geol 5:539–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Home of Bullet and PyBullet: physics simulation for games, visual effects, robotics and reinforcement learning. http://bulletphysics.org/. Accessed 11 Oct 2018

  32. Smirnov SV, Konovalov AV, Myasnikova MV, Khalevitsky YV, Smirnov AS, Igumnov AS (2016) A hierarchial modeling of stress-strain state of multiphase materialsubjected to uniaxial loading. In: AIP conference proceedings, vol. 1785. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4967123

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by Russian Sсience Foundation (Project 14-19-01358) in the part of metal matrix composite model development.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution “Institute of Engineering Science, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences” (IES UB RAS), 34 Komsomolskaya St., 620049, Ekaterinburg, Russia

    Yu. V. Khalevitsky & A. V. Konovalov

Authors
  1. Yu. V. Khalevitsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. V. Konovalov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu. V. Khalevitsky.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khalevitsky, Y.V., Konovalov, A.V. A gravitational approach to modeling the representative volume geometry of particle-reinforced metal matrix composites. Engineering with Computers 35, 1037–1044 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-018-0649-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-018-0649-8

Keywords