Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Heterogeneous parallel computing accelerated generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) method for fast hydrological model uncertainty analysis purpose

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) is a famous and widely used sensitivity and uncertainty analysis method. It provides a new way to solve the “equifinality” problem encountered in the hydrological model parameter estimation. In this research, we focused on the computational efficiency issue of the GLUE method. Inspired by the emerging heterogeneous parallel computing technology, we parallelized the GLUE in algorithmic level and then implemented the parallel GLUE algorithm on a multi-core CPU and many-core GPU hybrid heterogeneous hardware system. The parallel GLUE was implemented using OpenMP and CUDA software ecosystems for multi-core CPU and many-core GPU systems, respectively. Application of the parallel GLUE for the Xinanjiang hydrological model parameter sensitivity analysis proved its much better computational efficiency than the traditional serial computing technology, and the correctness was also verified. The heterogeneous parallel computing accelerated GLUE method has very good application prospects for theoretical analysis and real-world applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. Barca E, Porcu E, Bruno D, Passarella G (2017) An automated decision support system for aided assessment of variogram models. Environ Model Softw 87:72–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beven K, Binley A (1992) The future of distributed models: model calibration and predictive uncertainty. Hydrol Process 6:297–298

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beven K (1993) Prophecy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological modeling. Adv Water Resour 16:41–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Beven K (2006) A manifesto for the equifinality thesis. J Hydrol 320(1–2):18–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cameron D, Beven K, Tawn J, Blazkova S, Naden P (1999) Flood frequency estimation by continuous simulation for a gauged upland catchment (with uncertainty). J Hydrol 219:169–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cameron D, Beven K, Tawn J (2001) Modelling extreme rainfalls using a modified random pulse Bartlett–Lewis stochastic rainfall model (with uncertainty). Adv Water Resour 24:203–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Campbell E, Fox D et al (1999) A Bayesian approach to parameter estimation and pooling in nonlinear flood event models. Water Resour Res 35(1):211–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen S, Kang E et al (2003) Review of the hydrological model researches. J Desert Res 23(3):221–229 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chen S, Kan G, Li J, Ke H, Liang K (2018) Investigation of China urban air condition using big data, information theory and machine learning, 2018. Polish J Environ Stud 27(2):565–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen Z, Hartmann A, Goldscheider N (2017) A new approach to evaluate spatiotemporal dynamics of controlling parameters in distributed environmental models. Environ Model Softw 87:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dong J, Zheng C, Kan G, Wen J, Zhao M, Yu J (2015) Applying the ensemble artificial neural network-based hybrid data-driven model to daily total load forecasting. Neural Comput Appl 26(3):603–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fan YR, Huang GH, Baetz BW, Li YP, Huang K, Li Z, Chen X, Xiong LH (2017) Parameter uncertainty and temporal dynamics of sensitivity for hydrologic models: A hybrid sequential data assimilation and probabilistic collocation method. Environ Model Softw 86:30–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Franks S, Gineste P, Beven K, Merot P (1998) On constraining the predictions of a distributed model: the incorporation of fuzzy estimates of saturated areas into the calibration process. Water Resour Res 34(4):787–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Costa D, Burlando P, Liong SY (2017) Coupling spatially distributed river and groundwater transport models to investigate contaminant dynamics at river corridor scales. Environ Model Softw 86:91–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Groeneveld J, Muller B, Buchmann CM, Dressler G, Guo C, Hase N, Hoffmann F, John F, Klassert C, Lauf T, Liebelt V, Nolzen H, Pannicke N, Schulze J, Weise H, Schwarz N (2017) Theoretical foundations of human decision-making in agent-based land use models—a review. Environ Model Softw 87:39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hornberger GM, Spear RC (1981) An approach to the preliminary analysis of environmental systems. J Environ Manag 12:7–18

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kan G, Yao C, Li Q, Li Z, Yu Z, Liu Z, Ding L, He X, Liang K (2015) Improving event-based rainfall-runoff simulation using an ensemble artificial neural network based hybrid data-driven model. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 29:1345–1370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kan G, Li J, Zhang X, Ding L, He X, Liang K, Jiang X, Ren M, Li H, Wang F, Zhang Z, Hu Y (2015) A new hybrid data-driven model for event-based rainfall-runoff simulation. Neural Comput Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2200-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kan G, He X, Li J, Ding L, Zhang D, Lei T, Hong Y, Liang K, Zuo D, Bao Z, Zhang M (2016) A novel hybrid data-driven model for multi-input single-output system simulation. Neural Comput Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2534-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kan G, Liang K, Li J, Ding L, He X, Hu Y, Amo-Boateng M (2016) Accelerating the SCE-UA global optimization method based on multi-core CPU and many-core GPU. Adv Meteorol 2016:8483728. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8483728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kan G, Lei T, Liang K, Li J, Ding L, He X, Yu H, Zhang D, Zuo D, Bao Z,, Hu Y, Zhang M (2016) Mark Amo-boateng. A multi-core CPU and many-core GPU based fast parallel shuffled complex evolution global optimization approach. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPDS.2016.2575822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kan G, Zhang M, Liang K, Wang H, Jiang Y, Li J, Ding L, He X, Hong Y, Zuo D, Bao Z, Li C (2016) Improving water quantity simulation and forecasting to solve the energy-water-food nexus issue by using heterogeneous computing accelerated global optimization method. Appl Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.08.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kan G, He X, Li J, Ding L, Hong Y, Zhang H, Liang K, Zhang M (2017) Computer aided numerical methods for hydrological model calibration: an overview and recent development. Arch Comput Methods Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-017-9224-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kan G, He X, Ding L, Li J, Liang K, Hong Y (2017) Study on applicability of conceptual hydrological models for flood forecasting in humid, semi-humid semi-arid and arid basins in China. Water 9(10):719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kan G, Tang G, Yang Y, Hong Y, Li J, Ding L, He X, Liang K, He L, Li Z, Hu Y, Cui Y (2017) An improved coupled routing and excess storage (CREST) distributed hydrological model and its verification in Ganjiang river basin, China. Water 9(11):904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kan G, He X, Ding L, Li J, Liang K, Hong Y (2017) A heterogeneous computing accelerated SCE-UA global optimization method using OpenMP, CUDA and OpenACC. Water Sci Technol 76(7):1640–1651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kan G, He X, Ding L, Li J, Hong Y, Ren M, Lei T, Liang K, Zuo D, Huang P (2017) Daily streamflow simulation based on improved machine learning method. Tecnologia y Ciencias del Agua 8(2):51–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kan G, He X, Ding L, Li J, Hong Y, Zuo D, Ren M, Lei T, Liang K (2018) Fast hydrological model calibration based on the heterogeneous parallel computing accelerated shuffled complex evolution method. Eng Optim 50(1):106–449

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Li C, Cheng X, Li N, Du X, Yu Q, Kan G (2016) A framework for flood risk analysis and benefit assessment of flood control measures in urban areas. Int J Environ Res Public Health 13:787. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13080787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Li K, Kan G, Ding L, Dong Q, Liu K, Liang L (2018) A novel flood forecasting method based on initial state variable correction. Water 10(1):12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Li Z, Kan G, Yao C, Liu Z, Li Q, Yu S (2014) An improved neural network model and its application in hydrological simulation. J Hydrol Eng 19(10):04014019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Liu W, Chen Y, Wu C (2016) OpenCL heterogeneous parallel computing: from principle to practice. China Machine Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Locatelli T, Tarantola S, Gardiner B, Patenaude G (2017) Variance-based sensitivity analysis of a wind risk model—model behavior and lessons for forest modelling. Environ Model Softw 87:84–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mo X, Beven K (2004) Multi-objective parameter conditioning of a three-source wheat canopy model. Agric For Meteorol 122:39–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ratto M, Tarantola S, Saltelli A (2001) Sensitivity analysis in model calibration: GSA-GLUE approach. Comput Phys Commun 126:212–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Susan K, Beven K (1999) Equifinality, sensitivity and predictive uncertainty in the estimation of critical loads. Sci Total Environ 236:191–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Tan B (1996) Comparison and analysis of hydrological model parameter automatic optimization methods. J China Hydrol 5:8–14 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Uhlenbrook S, Sieber A (2005) On the value of experimental data to reduce the prediction uncertainty of a process-oriented catchment model. Environ Model Softw 20:19–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wu YP, Liu SG, Qiu LJ, Sun YZ (2017) SWAT-DayCent coupler: An integration tool for simultaneous hydro-biogeochemical modelling using SWAT and DayCent. Environ Model Softw 86:81–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhao R (1983) Watershed hydrological model-Xinanjiang model and Northern Shaanxi model. Water Resources and Electric Power Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  41. Zhao R (1994) Anthology of hydrological forecasting. Water Resources and Electric Power Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by Beijing Natural Science Foundation (8184094), IWHR Research and Development Support Program (JZ0145B022018, JZ0145B022017), the Third Sub-Project: Flood Forecasting, Controlling and Flood Prevention Aided Software Development—Flood Control Early Warning Communication System and Flood Forecasting, Controlling and Flood Prevention Aided Software Development for Poyang Lake Area of Jiangxi Province (0628-136006104242, JZ0205A432013, SLXMB200902), and Construction project of Shaanxi province medium and small river hydrological monitoring and forecast system—construction of Guanzhong and north of Shaanxi flood forecast scheme (JZ0205A112015). We gratefully acknowledge the support of NVIDIA Corporation with the donation of the Tesla K40 GPU used for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, Research Center on Flood and Drought Disaster Reduction of the Ministry of Water Resources, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing, 100038, People’s Republic of China

    Guangyuan Kan, Xiaoyan He, Liuqian Ding & Jiren Li

  2. State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Department of Hydraulic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, People’s Republic of China

    Guangyuan Kan & Yang Hong

  3. Hydrometeorology and Remote Sensing (HyDROS) Laboratory, School Civil Engineering and Environmental Science, and Advanced Radar Research Center, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, 73072, USA

    Yang Hong

  4. State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing IWHR Corporation, Beijing, 100048, People’s Republic of China

    Ke Liang

Authors
  1. Guangyuan Kan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiaoyan He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Liuqian Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jiren Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yang Hong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ke Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guangyuan Kan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kan, G., He, X., Ding, L. et al. Heterogeneous parallel computing accelerated generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) method for fast hydrological model uncertainty analysis purpose. Engineering with Computers 36, 75–96 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-018-0685-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-018-0685-4

Keywords