Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A novel approach for forecasting of ground vibrations resulting from blasting: modified particle swarm optimization coupled extreme learning machine

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ground vibration is one of the most important undesirable effects induced by blasting operations in the mining or tunneling projects. Hence, developing a precise model for prediction of ground vibration would be much beneficial to control environmental issues of blasting. The present study proposes a new hybrid machine learning (ML) technique, i.e., autonomous groups particles swarm optimization (AGPSO)–extreme learning machine (ELM) to predict ground vibration resulting from blasting. In fact, AGPSO–ELM model is a modified version of PSO–ELM that can solve problems in a way with higher prediction performance. For comparison purposes, PSO–ELM, minimax probability machine regression, least square–support vector machine and Gaussian process regression models were also proposed to estimate ground vibration. The said ML models were trained and tested based on a database comprising of 102 datasets collected from a quarry site in Malaysia. In the modeling of ML techniques, six input parameters were considered: burden to spacing ratio, maximum charge per delay, stemming, distance from the blasting-face, powder factor and hole depth. The results of ML techniques were evaluated in both stages of training and testing based on five fitness parameters criteria. Considering results of both training and testing datasets, AGPSO–ELM model was able to provide higher prediction performance for PPV prediction. Root-mean-square error values of (0.08 and 0.08) and coefficient of determination values of (0.92 and 0.90) were obtained, respectively, for training and testing datasets of AGPSO–ELM model which revealed that the new hybrid model is capable enough to forecast ground vibration induced by blasting. The newly proposed model can be used in other fields of science and engineering in order to get high accuracy level of prediction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Raina AK, Murthy V, Soni AK (2014) Flyrock in bench blasting: a comprehensive review. Bull Eng Geol Environ 73:1199–1209

    Google Scholar 

  2. Armaghani DJ, Hajihassani M, Mohamad ET et al (2014) Blasting-induced flyrock and ground vibration prediction through an expert artificial neural network based on particle swarm optimization. Arab J Geosci 7:5383–5396

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shirani Faradonbeh R, Monjezi M, Jahed Armaghani D (2016) Genetic programing and non-linear multiple regression techniques to predict backbreak in blasting operation. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-015-0404-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Saadat M, Khandelwal M, Monjezi M (2014) An ANN-based approach to predict blast-induced ground vibration of Gol-E-Gohar iron ore mine, Iran. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2013.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Trivedi R, Singh TN, Gupta N (2015) Prediction of blast-induced flyrock in opencast mines using ANN and ANFIS. Geotech Geol Eng 33:875–891

    Google Scholar 

  6. Han H, Armaghani DJ, Tarinejad R et al (2020) Random forest and bayesian network techniques for probabilistic prediction of flyrock induced by blasting in quarry sites. Nat Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-019-09611-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhou J, Koopialipoor M, Murlidhar BR et al (2019) Use of intelligent methods to design effective pattern parameters of mine blasting to minimize flyrock distance. Nat Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-019-09519-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kumar R, Choudhury D, Bhargava K (2016) Determination of blast-induced ground vibration equations for rocks using mechanical and geological properties. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2015.10.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dindarloo SR (2015) Prediction of blast-induced ground vibrations via genetic programming. Int J Min Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2015.09.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Verma AK, Singh TN (2011) Intelligent systems for ground vibration measurement: a comparative study. Eng Comput 27:225–233

    Google Scholar 

  11. Armaghani DJ, Momeni E, Abad SVANK, Khandelwal M (2015) Feasibility of ANFIS model for prediction of ground vibrations resulting from quarry blasting. Environ Earth Sci 74:2845–2860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4305-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Standard I (1973) Criteria for safety and design of structures subjected to under ground blast. ISI, IS-6922

  13. Iphar M, Yavuz M, Ak H (2008) Prediction of ground vibrations resulting from the blasting operations in an open-pit mine by adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Environ Geol 56:97–107

    Google Scholar 

  14. Khandelwal M, Singh TN (2013) Prediction of blast-induced ground vibration using artificial neural network. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46:1214–1222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2009.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Duvall WI, Fogelson DE (1962) Review of criteria for estimating damage to residences from blasting vibrations. US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines

  16. Roy P (1993) Putting ground vibration predictions into practice. Colliery Guard 241:63–67

    Google Scholar 

  17. Davies B, Farmer IW, Attewell PB (1964) Ground vibrations from shallow sub-surface blasts. The Engineer, vol 217. London, pp 553–559

  18. Langefors U, Kihlström B (1963) The modern technique of rock blasting. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hasanipanah M, Monjezi M, Shahnazar A et al (2015) Feasibility of indirect determination of blast induced ground vibration based on support vector machine. Meas J Int Meas Confed. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2015.07.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Monjezi M, Ghafurikalajahi M, Bahrami A (2011) Prediction of blast-induced ground vibration using artificial neural networks. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 26:46–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2010.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hasanipanah M, Monjezi M, Shahnazar A et al (2015) Feasibility of indirect determination of blast induced ground vibration based on support vector machine. Measurement 75:289–297

    Google Scholar 

  22. Khandelwal M, Singh TN (2009) Correlating static properties of coal measures rocks with P-wave velocity. Int J Coal Geol 79:55–60

    Google Scholar 

  23. Monjezi M, Hasanipanah M, Khandelwal M (2013) Evaluation and prediction of blast-induced ground vibration at Shur River Dam, Iran, by artificial neural network. Neural Comput Appl 22:1637–1643

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mohammadhassani M, Nezamabadi-Pour H, Suhatril M, Shariati M (2014) An evolutionary fuzzy modelling approach and comparison of different methods for shear strength prediction of high-strength concrete beams without stirrups. Int J Smart Struct Syst 14:785–809

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chahnasir ES, Zandi Y, Shariati M et al (2018) Application of support vector machine with firefly algorithm for investigation of the factors affecting the shear strength of angle shear connectors. SMART Struct Syst 22:413–424

    Google Scholar 

  26. Asteris PG, Armaghani DJ, Hatzigeorgiou GD et al (2019) Predicting the shear strength of reinforced concrete beams using artificial neural networks. Comput Concr 24:469–488

    Google Scholar 

  27. Armaghani DJ, Hatzigeorgiou GD, Karamani C et al (2019) Soft computing-based techniques for concrete beams shear strength. Procedia Struct Integr 17:924–933

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hajihassani M, Abdullah SS, Asteris PG, Armaghani DJ (2019) A gene expression programming model for predicting tunnel convergence. Appl Sci 9:4650

    Google Scholar 

  29. Chen H, Asteris PG, Jahed Armaghani D et al (2019) Assessing dynamic conditions of the retaining wall: developing two hybrid intelligent models. Appl Sci 9:1042

    Google Scholar 

  30. Xu H, Zhou J, Asteris GP et al (2019) Supervised machine learning techniques to the prediction of tunnel boring machine penetration rate. Appl Sci 9:3715

    Google Scholar 

  31. Huang L, Asteris PG, Koopialipoor M et al (2019) Invasive weed optimization technique-based ANN to the prediction of rock tensile strength. Appl Sci 9:5372

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sarir P, Chen J, Asteris PG et al (2019) Developing GEP tree-based, neuro-swarm, and whale optimization models for evaluation of bearing capacity of concrete-filled steel tube columns. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00808-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Asteris PG, Nikoo M (2019) Artificial bee colony-based neural network for the prediction of the fundamental period of infilled frame structures. Neural Comput Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-03965-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Asteris PG, Kolovos KG (2019) Self-compacting concrete strength prediction using surrogate models. Neural Comput Appl 31:409–424

    Google Scholar 

  35. Monjezi M, Khoshalan H, Razifard M (2012) A neuro-genetic network for predicting uniaxial compressive strength of rocks. Geotech Geol Eng 30:1053–1062

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mojtahedi SFF, Ebtehaj I, Hasanipanah M et al (2018) Proposing a novel hybrid intelligent model for the simulation of particle size distribution resulting from blasting. Eng Comput 35(1):47–56

    Google Scholar 

  37. Koopialipoor M, Tootoonchi H, Jahed Armaghani D et al (2019) Application of deep neural networks in predicting the penetration rate of tunnel boring machines. Bull Eng Geol Environ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-019-01538-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhou J, Aghili N, Ghaleini EN et al (2019) A Monte Carlo simulation approach for effective assessment of flyrock based on intelligent system of neural network. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00726-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Xu C, Gordan B, Koopialipoor M et al (2019) Improving performance of retaining walls under dynamic conditions developing an optimized ANN based on ant colony optimization technique. IEEE Access 7:94692–94700

    Google Scholar 

  40. Harandizadeh H, Armaghani DJ, Khari M (2019) A new development of ANFIS–GMDH optimized by PSO to predict pile bearing capacity based on experimental datasets. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00849-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Harandizadeh H, Toufigh MM, Toufigh V (2018) Application of improved ANFIS approaches to estimate bearing capacity of piles. Soft Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3517-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhou J, Shi X, Li X (2016) Utilizing gradient boosted machine for the prediction of damage to residential structures owing to blasting vibrations of open pit mining. J Vib Control 22:3986–3997

    Google Scholar 

  43. Zhou J, Li E, Yang S et al (2019) Slope stability prediction for circular mode failure using gradient boosting machine approach based on an updated database of case histories. Saf Sci 118:505–518

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wang M, Shi X, Zhou J (2018) Charge design scheme optimization for ring blasting based on the developed Scaled Heelan model. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 110:199–209

    Google Scholar 

  45. Zhou J, Li X, Mitri HS (2015) Comparative performance of six supervised learning methods for the development of models of hard rock pillar stability prediction. Nat Hazards 79:291–316

    Google Scholar 

  46. Singh R, Kainthola A, Singh TN (2012) Estimation of elastic constant of rocks using an ANFIS approach. Appl Soft Comput 12:40–45

    Google Scholar 

  47. Zhou J, Bejarbaneh BY, Armaghani DJ, Tahir MM (2019) Forecasting of TBM advance rate in hard rock condition based on artificial neural network and genetic programming techniques. Bull Eng Geol Environ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-019-01626-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Asteris PG, Mokos VG (2019) Concrete compressive strength using artificial neural networks. Neural Comput Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04663-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Asteris PG, Ashrafian A, Rezaie-Balf M (2019) Prediction of the compressive strength of self-compacting concrete using surrogate models. Comput Concr 24:137–150

    Google Scholar 

  50. Apostolopoulou M, Armaghani DJ, Bakolas A et al (2019) Compressive strength of natural hydraulic lime mortars using soft computing techniques. Procedia Struct Integr 17:914–923

    Google Scholar 

  51. Asteris PG, Moropoulou A, Skentou AD et al (2019) Stochastic vulnerability assessment of masonry structures: concepts, modeling and restoration aspects. Appl Sci 9:243

    Google Scholar 

  52. Asteris PG, Apostolopoulou M, Skentou AD, Moropoulou A (2019) Application of artificial neural networks for the prediction of the compressive strength of cement-based mortars. Comput Concr 24:329–345

    Google Scholar 

  53. Cavaleri L, Chatzarakis GE, Di TrapaniF et al (2017) Modeling of surface roughness in electro-discharge machining using artificial neural networks. Adv Mater Res 6:169–184

    Google Scholar 

  54. Cavaleri L, Asteris PG, Psyllaki PP et al (2019) Prediction of surface treatment effects on the tribological performance of tool steels using artificial neural networks. Appl Sci 9:2788

    Google Scholar 

  55. Psyllaki P, Stamatiou K, Iliadis I et al (2018) Surface treatment of tool steels against galling failure. In: MATEC web of conferences. EDP sciences, p 4024

  56. Alavi Nezhad Khalil Abad SV, Yilmaz M, Jahed Armaghani D, Tugrul A (2016) Prediction of the durability of limestone aggregates using computational techniques. Neural Comput Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2456-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Momeni E, Armaghani DJ, Fatemi SA, Nazir R (2018) Prediction of bearing capacity of thin-walled foundation: a simulation approach. Eng Comput 34:319–327

    Google Scholar 

  58. Armaghani DJ, Mohamad ET, Narayanasamy MS et al (2017) Development of hybrid intelligent models for predicting TBM penetration rate in hard rock condition. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 63:29–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2016.12.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Armaghani DJ, Mohamad ET, Momeni E et al (2016) Prediction of the strength and elasticity modulus of granite through an expert artificial neural network. Arab J Geosci 9:48

    Google Scholar 

  60. Mohammadhassani M, Nezamabadi-Pour H, Suhatril M, Shariati M (2013) Identification of a suitable ANN architecture in predicting strain in tie section of concrete deep beams. Struct Eng Mech 46:853–868

    Google Scholar 

  61. Mansouri I, Shariati M, Safa M et al (2019) Analysis of influential factors for predicting the shear strength of a V-shaped angle shear connector in composite beams using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy technique. J Intell Manuf 30:1247–1257

    Google Scholar 

  62. Hajihassani M, Jahed Armaghani D, Marto A, Tonnizam Mohamad E (2014) Ground vibration prediction in quarry blasting through an artificial neural network optimized by imperialist competitive algorithm. Bull Eng Geol Environ 74:873–886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-014-0657-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Shahnazar A, Nikafshan Rad H, Hasanipanah M et al (2017) A new developed approach for the prediction of ground vibration using a hybrid PSO-optimized ANFIS-based model. Environ Earth Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6864-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Amiri M, Amnieh HB, Hasanipanah M, Khanli LM (2016) A new combination of artificial neural network and K-nearest neighbors models to predict blast-induced ground vibration and air-overpressure. Eng Comput 32:631–644

    Google Scholar 

  65. Shirani Faradonbeh R, Jahed Armaghani D, Abd Majid MZ et al (2016) Prediction of ground vibration due to quarry blasting based on gene expression programming: a new model for peak particle velocity prediction. Int J Environ Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-016-0979-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Sheykhi H, Bagherpour R, Ghasemi E, Kalhori H (2018) Forecasting ground vibration due to rock blasting: a hybrid intelligent approach using support vector regression and fuzzy C-means clustering. Eng Comput 34:357–365

    Google Scholar 

  67. Mirjalili S, Lewis A, Sadiq AS (2014) Autonomous particles groups for particle swarm optimization. Arab J Sci Eng 39:4683–4697

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  68. Khandelwal M, Singh TN (2009) Prediction of blast-induced ground vibration using artificial neural network. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46:1214–1222

    Google Scholar 

  69. Kennedy J, Eberhart RC (1995) A discrete binary version of the particle swarm algorithm. In: 1997 IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics, 1997. Computational cybernetics and simulation. IEEE, pp 4104–4108

  70. Hajihassani M, Armaghani D, Sohaei H, Mohamad E (2014) Prediction of airblast-overpressure induced by blasting using a hybrid artificial neural network and particle swarm optimization. Appl Acoust 80:57–67

    Google Scholar 

  71. Gordan B, Jahed Armaghani D, Hajihassani M, Monjezi M (2016) Prediction of seismic slope stability through combination of particle swarm optimization and neural network. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-015-0400-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Pal M, Deswal S (2014) Extreme learning machine based modeling of resilient modulus of subgrade soils. Geotech Geol Eng 32:287–296

    Google Scholar 

  73. Huang G-B, Zhou H, Ding X, Zhang R (2011) Extreme learning machine for regression and multiclass classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B 42:513–529

    Google Scholar 

  74. Huang G-B, Zhu Q-Y, Siew C-K (2006) Extreme learning machine: theory and applications. Neurocomputing 70:489–501

    Google Scholar 

  75. Huang G-B, Chen L, Siew CK (2006) Universal approximation using incremental constructive feedforward networks with random hidden nodes. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 17:879–892

    Google Scholar 

  76. Cui D, Huang G-B, Liu T (2018) ELM based smile detection using distance vector. Pattern Recognit 79:356–369

    Google Scholar 

  77. Zhu H, Tsang ECC, Zhu J (2018) Training an extreme learning machine by localized generalization error model. Soft Comput 22:3477–3485

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  78. Mohapatra P, Chakravarty S, Dash PK (2015) An improved cuckoo search based extreme learning machine for medical data classification. Swarm Evol Comput 24:25–49

    Google Scholar 

  79. Satapathy P, Dhar S, Dash PK (2017) An evolutionary online sequential extreme learning machine for maximum power point tracking and control in multi-photovoltaic microgrid system. Renew Energy Focus 21:33–53

    Google Scholar 

  80. Li L-L, Sun J, Tseng M-L, Li Z-G (2019) Extreme learning machine optimized by whale optimization algorithm using insulated gate bipolar transistor module aging degree evaluation. Expert Syst Appl 127:58–67

    Google Scholar 

  81. Cao J, Lin Z, Huang G-B (2012) Self-adaptive evolutionary extreme learning machine. Neural Process Lett 36:285–305

    Google Scholar 

  82. Chen S, Shang Y, Wu M (2016) Application of PSO-ELM in electronic system fault diagnosis. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on prognostics and health management (ICPHM). IEEE, pp 1–5

  83. Marshall AW, Olkin I (1960) Multivariate chebyshev inequalities. Ann Math Stat. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177705673

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  84. Bertsimas D, Popescu I (2005) Optimal inequalities in probability theory: a convex optimization approach. SIAM J Optim. https://doi.org/10.1137/S1052623401399903

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  85. Lanckriet G, Ghaoui L, Bhattacharyya C (2002) Minimax probability machine. In: Advances in neural information processing systems, papers.nips.cc

  86. Strohmann T, Grudic G (2003) A formulation for minimax probability machine regression. In: Advances in neural information processing systems, papers.nips.cc

  87. Vapnik V (1995) The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  88. Zhang L, Rao K, Wang R (2015) T-QoS-aware based parallel ant colony algorithm for services composition. J Syst Eng Electron 26:1100–1106

    Google Scholar 

  89. Zhu C, Huo Y, Leung VCM, Yang LT (2016) Sensor-cloud and power line communication: recent developments and integration. In: Proceedings—2016 IEEE 14th international conference on dependable, autonomic and secure computing (DASC 2016), 2016 IEEE 14th international conference on pervasive intelligence and computing (PICom 2016), 2016 IEEE 2nd international conference on big data

  90. Rasmussen CE (2004) Gaussian processes in machine learning. Springer, Berlin, pp 63–71

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  91. Matérn B (1960) Spatial variation, volume 36 of lecture notes in statistics, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  92. Zhang Y, Wang S, Ji G (2015) A comprehensive survey on particle swarm optimization algorithm and its applications. Math Probl Eng 2015:Article ID 931256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015

  93. Cai X, Cui Y, Tan Y (2009) Predicted modified PSO with time-varying accelerator coefficients. Cognition 1:3

    Google Scholar 

  94. Cai X, Cui Z, Zeng J, Tan Y (2008) Dispersed particle swarm optimization. Inf Process Lett 105:231–235

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  95. Bao GQ, Mao KF (2009) Particle swarm optimization algorithm with asymmetric time varying acceleration coefficients. In: 2009 IEEE international conference on robotics and biomimetics (ROBIO). IEEE, pp 2134–2139

  96. Yu Z, Shi X, Zhou J et al (2019) Prediction of blast-induced rock movement during bench blasting: use of gray wolf optimizer and support vector regression. Nat Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-019-09593-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Khari M, Armaghani DJ, Dehghanbanadaki A (2019) Prediction of lateral deflection of small-scale piles using hybrid PSO–ANN model. Arab J Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-019-04134-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Asteris PG, Argyropoulos I, Cavaleri L et al (2018) Masonry compressive strength prediction using artificial neural networks. In: International conference on transdisciplinary multispectral modeling and cooperation for the preservation of cultural heritage. Springer, Berlin, pp 200–224

  99. Asteris P, Roussis P, Douvika M (2017) Feed-forward neural network prediction of the mechanical properties of sandcrete materials. Sensors 17:1344

    Google Scholar 

  100. Asteris PG, Tsaris AK, Cavaleri L et al (2016) Prediction of the fundamental period of infilled RC frame structures using artificial neural networks. Comput Intell Neurosci 2016:20

    Google Scholar 

  101. Apostolopoulour M, Douvika MG, Kanellopoulos IN et al (2018) Prediction of compressive strength of mortars using artificial neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference TMM_CH, transdisciplinary multispectral modelling and cooperation for the preservation of cultural heritage, Athens, Greece, pp 10–13

  102. Zhou J, Guo H, Koopialipoor M et al (2020) Investigating the effective parameters on the risk levels of rockburst phenomena by developing a hybrid heuristic algorithm. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00908-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Mahdiyar A, Jahed Armaghani D, Koopialipoor M et al (2020) Practical risk assessment of ground vibrations resulting from blasting, using gene expression programming and Monte Carlo simulation techniques. Appl Sci 10:472

    Google Scholar 

  104. Yong W, Zhou J, Armaghani DJ et al (2020) A new hybrid simulated annealing-based genetic programming technique to predict the ultimate bearing capacity of piles. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00932-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Duvall W, Petkof B (1958) Spherical propagation of explosion-generated strain pulses in rock. Bur Mines

  106. Edwards A, Northwood T (1960) Experimental studies of the effects of blasting on structures. Division of Building Research, National Research Council

  107. Lemon J, Bolker B, Oom S, Klein E, Rowlingson B, Wickham H, Tyagi A, Eterradossi O, Grothendieck GTM (2009) Plotrix: various plotting functions. R package version 2.7-2. R Project for Statistical Computing, Vienna

  108. Taylor KE (2001) Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram. J Geophys Res Atmos 106:7183–7192. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Ghasemi E, Ataei M, Hashemolhosseini H (2013) Development of a fuzzy model for predicting ground vibration caused by rock blasting in surface mining. J Vib Control 19:755–770

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Modeling Evolutionary Algorithms Simulation and Artificial Intelligence, Faculty of Electrical & Electronics Engineering, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

    Danial Jahed Armaghani

  2. Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Patna, Ashok Raj Path, Patna, 800005, India

    Deepak Kumar & Pijush Samui

  3. Institute of Research and Development, Duy Tan University, Da Nang, 550000, Vietnam

    Mahdi Hasanipanah

  4. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, National Institute of Technology Patna, Patna, India

    Bishwajit Roy

Authors
  1. Danial Jahed Armaghani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Deepak Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pijush Samui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mahdi Hasanipanah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Bishwajit Roy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahdi Hasanipanah.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jahed Armaghani, D., Kumar, D., Samui, P. et al. A novel approach for forecasting of ground vibrations resulting from blasting: modified particle swarm optimization coupled extreme learning machine. Engineering with Computers 37, 3221–3235 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-00997-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-00997-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation