Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sizing and prestress optimization of Class-2 tensegrity structures for space boom applications

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Design of real engineering structures can benefit from an optimization step in which various parameters can be determined to satisfy a given set of requirements and constraints. Optimization of spatial assemblies such as truss or frame structures involves sizing optimization to minimize the mass of the structure. Optimization of tensegrity structures is more challenging as prestress levels should be optimized as well. In this paper, sizing and prestress optimization of Class-2 tensegrity booms are addressed using a particle swarm optimization approach. Nonlinear finite-element models of tensegrity structures and solution methods provide a starting point. Furthermore, a continuum beam modeling technique for tensegrity structures with repeating units is also useful. The particle swarm optimization algorithm is described and two numerical examples are presented. The first example studies the design and single-objective optimization of a deployable Class-2 tensegrity boom with reinforcing cables to maximize the bending stiffness-to-mass ratio. The results indicate that the optimum structure is capable of competing well with the state-of-the-art deployable booms in terms of stiffness-to-mass ratio. The second example investigates a multi-objective optimization problem of a Class-2 tensegrity boom. The objective functions are selected as minimization of the mass and tip displacement, respectively. The objective functions are at least partially conflicting; therefore, Pareto-optimal solutions are obtained to guide future design decisions. The results show the potential of tensegrity structures for implementation as space structures and the robustness of the particle swarm optimization algorithm, even for multi-objective optimization problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wang B (2004) Free-standing tension structures: from tensegrity systems to cable-strut systems. Taylor and Francis Group, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Skelton RE, de Oliveira MC (2009) Tensegrity systems, vol 1. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Ali NBH, Rhode-Barbarigos L, Albi AAP, Smith IF (2010) Design optimization and dynamic analysis of a tensegrity-based footbridge. Eng Struct 32(11):3650–3659

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dalilsafaei S, Eriksson A, Tibert G (2012) Improving bending stiffness of tensegrity booms. Int J Space Struct 27(2–3):117–129

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yildiz K (2018) Cable actuated tensegrity structures for deployable space booms with enhanced stiffness. PhD thesis, The Pennsylvania State University

  6. Kebiche K, Kazi-Aoual M, Motro R (1999) Geometrical non-linear analysis of tensegrity systems. Eng Struct 21(9):864–876

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tibert A, Pellegrino S (2003) Review of form-finding methods for tensegrity structures. Int J Space Struct 18(4):209–223

    Google Scholar 

  8. Estrada GG, Bungartz HJ, Mohrdieck C (2006) Numerical form-finding of tensegrity structures. Int J Solids Struct 43(22–23):6855–6868

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Tran HC, Lee J (2010) Advanced form-finding of tensegrity structures. Comput Struct 88(3–4):237–246

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tran HC, Lee J (2011) Form-finding of tensegrity structures with multiple states of self-stress. Acta Mech 222(1–2):131

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Tran HC, Lee J (2013) Form-finding of tensegrity structures using double singular value decomposition. Eng Comput 29(1):71–86

    Google Scholar 

  12. De Jager B, Skelton RE (2004) Symbolic stiffness optimization of planar tensegrity structures. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 15(3):181–193

    Google Scholar 

  13. Masic M, Skelton RE (2006) Selection of prestress for optimal dynamic/control performance of tensegrity structures. Int J Solids Struct 43(7–8):2110–2125

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Masic M, Skelton RE, Gill PE (2006) Optimization of tensegrity structures. Int J Solids Struct 43(16):4687–4703

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Raja MG, Narayanan S (2009) Simultaneous optimization of structure and control of smart tensegrity structures. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 20(1):109–117

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lee S, Lee J (2014) Optimum self-stress design of cable-strut structures using frequency constraints. Int J Mech Sci 89:462–469

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kanno Y (2012) Topology optimization of tensegrity structures under self-weight loads. J Oper Res Soc Jpn 55(2):125–145

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Kanno Y (2013) Topology optimization of tensegrity structures under compliance constraint: a mixed integer linear programming approach. Optim Eng 14(1):61–96

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Marzari Q (2014) Optimization of tensegrity structures. Master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  20. Xu X, Wang Y, Luo Y, Hu D (2018) Topology optimization of tensegrity structures considering buckling constraints. J Struct Eng 144(10):04018,173

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang J, Ohsaki M (2007) Optimization methods for force and shape design of tensegrity structures. In: Proc 7th world congresses of structural and multidisciplinary optimization, pp 40–49

  22. Ashwear N, Tamadapu G, Eriksson A (2016) Optimization of modular tensegrity structures for high stiffness and frequency separation requirements. Int J Solids Struct 80:297–309

    Google Scholar 

  23. Xu X, Wang Y, Luo Y (2018) An improved multi-objective topology optimization approach for tensegrity structures. Adv Struct Eng 21(1):59–70

    Google Scholar 

  24. Guest SD (2010) The stiffness of tensegrity structures. IMA J Appl Math 76(1):57–66

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Nuhoglu A, Korkmaz KA (2011) A practical approach for nonlinear analysis of tensegrity systems. Eng Comput 27(4):337–345

    Google Scholar 

  26. Murakami H (2001) Static and dynamic analyses of tensegrity structures. Part 1. Nonlinear equations of motion. Int J Solids Struct 38(20):3599–3613

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Tran HC, Lee J (2011) Geometric and material nonlinear analysis of tensegrity structures. Acta Mech Sin 27(6):938–949

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Nishimura Y (2000) Static and dynamic analyses of tensegrity structures. PhD thesis, University of California, San Diego

  29. Sultan C (2009) Tensegrity: 60 years of art, science, and engineering. Adv Appl Mech 43:69–145

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang J, Ohsaki M (2015) Tensegrity structures: form, stability, and symmetry. Springer, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  31. Skelton RE, Adhikari R, Pinaud JP, Chan W, Helton J (2001) An introduction to the mechanics of tensegrity structures. In: Proceedings of the 40th IEEE conference on decision and control (Cat. No. 01CH37228), IEEE, vol 5, pp 4254–4259

  32. Noor AK, Anderson MS, Greene WH (1978) Continuum models for beam-and platelike lattice structures. AIAA J 16(12):1219–1228

    Google Scholar 

  33. Dow JO, Su Z, Feng C, Bodley C (1985) Equivalent continuum representation of structures composed of repeated elements. AIAA J 23(10):1564–1569

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kebiche K, Aoual MK, Motro R (2008) Continuum models for systems in a selfstress state. Int J Space Struct 23(2):103–115

    Google Scholar 

  35. Yildiz K, Lesieutre GA (2019) Effective beam stiffness properties of n-strut cylindrical tensegrity towers. AIAA J 57(5):2185–2194

    Google Scholar 

  36. Eberhart R, Kennedy J (1995) A new optimizer using particle swarm theory. In: MHS’95. Proceedings of the sixth international symposium on micro machine and human science, Ieee, pp 39–43

  37. Eberhart R, Simpson P, Dobbins R (1996) Computational intelligence PC tools. Academic Press Professional, Inc, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  38. Eberhart RC, Hu X (1999) Human tremor analysis using particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the 1999 congress on evolutionary computation-CEC99 (Cat. No. 99TH8406), IEEE, vol 3, pp 1927–1930

  39. Fukuyama Y, Nakanishi Y (1999) A particle swarm optimization for reactive power and voltage control considering voltage stability. In: Proc. 11th IEEE Int. Conf. Intell. Syst. Appl. Power Syst, pp 117–121

  40. Poli R (2008) Analysis of the publications on the applications of particle swarm optimisation. J Artif Evol Appl 2008

  41. Shi Y, Eberhart R (1998) A modified particle swarm optimizer. In: 1998 IEEE international conference on evolutionary computation proceedings. IEEE world congress on computational intelligence (Cat. No. 98TH8360), IEEE, pp 69–73

  42. Eberhart RC, Shi Y (2000) Comparing inertia weights and constriction factors in particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the 2000 congress on evolutionary computation. CEC00 (Cat. No. 00TH8512), IEEE, vol 1, pp 84–88

  43. Coello CAC, Pulido GT, Lechuga MS (2004) Handling multiple objectives with particle swarm optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 8(3):256–279

    Google Scholar 

  44. Liu H, Cai Z, Wang Y (2010) Hybridizing particle swarm optimization with differential evolution for constrained numerical and engineering optimization. Appl Soft Comput 10(2):629–640

    Google Scholar 

  45. Xia L, Cui Y, Gu X, Geng Z (2013) Kinetics modelling of ethylene cracking furnace based on sqp-cpso algorithm. Trans Inst Meas Control 35(4):531–539

    Google Scholar 

  46. Chen Y, Yan J, Sareh P, Feng J (2020) Feasible prestress modes for cable-strut structures with multiple self-stress states using particle swarm optimization. J Comput Civ Eng 34(3):04020,003

    Google Scholar 

  47. Wang B, Li Y (2003) Novel cable-strut grids made of prisms: part i. Basic theory and design. J Int Assoc Shell Spat Struct 44(2):93–108

    Google Scholar 

  48. Pinaud JP, Solari S, Skelton RE (2004) Deployment of a class 2 tensegrity boom. In: Smart structures and materials 2004: smart structures and integrated systems, international society for optics and photonics, vol 5390, pp 155–162

  49. Masic M, Skelton RE (2004) Open-loop control of class-2 tensegrity towers. In: Smart structures and materials 2004: modeling, signal processing, and control, international society for optics and photonics, vol 5383, pp 298–308

  50. Masic M, Skelton RE (2005) Path planning and open-loop shape control of modular tensegrity structures. J Guid Control Dyn 28(3):421–430

    Google Scholar 

  51. Guest S (2006) The stiffness of prestressed frameworks: a unifying approach. Int J Solids Struct 43(3–4):842–854

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. Tibert G, Pellegrino S (2003) Deployable tensegrity masts. In: 44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, p 1978

  53. (2019) Northrop grumman astromast. http://www.northropgrumman.com/BusinessVentures/AstroAerospace/Products/Pages/AstroMast.aspx. Accessed 12 Dec 2019

  54. Garrett HB, Pike CP (1980) Space systems and their interactions with Earth’s space environment. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics

  55. Murphey TW (2006) Booms and trusses. In: Jenkins CHM (ed) Recent advances in gossamer spacecraft (Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics). AIAA, chap 1, pp 1–44

  56. Tran HC, Lee J (2010) Initial self-stress design of tensegrity grid structures. Comput Struct 88(9–10):558–566

    Google Scholar 

  57. Greschik G (2007) Global imperfection-based column stability analysis. In: 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, p 2225

  58. Cui Y, Geng Z, Zhu Q, Han Y (2017) Multi-objective optimization methods and application in energy saving. Energy 125:681–704

    Google Scholar 

  59. Haimes YY, Lasdon LS, Da Wismer D (1971) On a bicriterion formation of the problems of integrated system identification and system optimization. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 1(3):296–297

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Aerospace Research Center, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Kaan Yildiz

  2. Department of Aerospace Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA

    George A. Lesieutre

Authors
  1. Kaan Yildiz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. George A. Lesieutre
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kaan Yildiz.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 3 and 4.

Table 3 Design variables for the first optimization problem
Full size table
Table 4 Design variables for the second optimization problem
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yildiz, K., Lesieutre, G.A. Sizing and prestress optimization of Class-2 tensegrity structures for space boom applications. Engineering with Computers 38, 1451–1464 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01111-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01111-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation