Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Developing the artificial neural network–evolutionary algorithms hybrid models (ANN–EA) to predict the daily evaporation from dam reservoirs

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evaporation is one of the key factors in the hydrological cycle, and it is one of the most critical parameters in hydrological, agricultural, and meteorological studies, especially in arid and semi-arid regions. By estimating evaporation, it is possible to make a significant contribution to studies related to water balance, management and design of irrigation systems, estimation of crop amount, and management of water resources. In this regard, in the present study, using artificial neural network (ANN) and its hybrid algorithms including Harris Hawks Optimization (HHO), Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA), and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), the daily evaporation value from the reservoir of Qaleh Chay Ajab Shir dam was estimated. For this purpose, the effective parameters in the evaporation process were introduced to each of the models in the form of different input patterns, and the evaporation value from the reservoir was also considered as output parameter. The results showed that the best selected model for ANN is the P3 model including three parameters of minimum air temperature, and daily evaporation data with NASH of 0.89, RMSE of 1.5 mm/day, and MAE of 1.1 mm/day, which was optimized by applying hybrid algorithms to train the neural network. The results disclosed that all three models had a good performance in estimating the daily evaporation value, so that the value of the correlation coefficient for all three models is in the range of 0.95–0.99. Based on evaluation criteria, ANN–HHO has better performance than the two other algorithms in estimating daily evaporation value. The values of NASH, RMSE and MAE for the selected pattern of the test data are 0.943, 0.908 and 0.736 mm/day, respectively. For better analysis, Taylor diagram is used (RMSD = 0.98, CC = 0.97, STD = 4 for ANN–HHO). The results of this diagram also showed that the ANN–HHO model provides acceptable performance when compared with other models. Considering the promising results of the models in predicting the daily evaporation from dam, it is suggested to use the existing approach for landscaping the groundwater balance and design of irrigation systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Adib A, Mahmoodi A (2017) Prediction of suspended sediment load using ANN GA conjunction model with Markov chain approach at flood conditions. KSCE J Civ Eng 21(1):447–457

    Google Scholar 

  2. Agatonovic-Kustrin S, Beresford R (2000) Basic concepts of artificial neural network (ANN) modeling and its application in pharmaceutical research. J Pharm Biomed Anal 22(5):717–727

    Google Scholar 

  3. Allawi MF, Aidan IA, El-Shafie A (2021) Enhancing the performance of data-driven models for monthly reservoir evaporation prediction. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(7):8281–8295

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ashrafzadeh A, Kisi O, Aghelpour P, Biazar SM, Masouleh MA (2020) Comparative study of time series models, support vector machines, and GMDH in forecasting long-term evapotranspiration rates in northern Iran. J Irrig Drain Eng 146(6):04020010

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ashrafzadeh A, Malik A, Jothiprakash V, Ghorbani MA, Biazar SM (2018) Estimation of daily pan evaporation using neural networks and meta-heuristic approaches. ISH J Hydraul Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/09715010.2018.1498754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Azar NA, Milan SG, Kayhomayoon Z (2021) The prediction of longitudinal dispersion coefficient in natural streams using LS-SVM and ANFIS optimized by Harris hawk optimization algorithm. J Contam Hydrol 240:103781

    Google Scholar 

  7. Biazar SM, Ferdosi FB (2020) An investigation on spatial and temporal trends in frost indices in Northern Iran. Theoret Appl Climatol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-020-03248-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Biazar SM, Dinpashoh Y, Singh VP (2019) Sensitivity analysis of the reference crop evapotranspiration in a humid region. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(31):32517–32544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06419-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bruton JM, McClendon RW, Hoogenboom G (2000) Estimating daily pan evaporation with artificial neural networks. T Asae 43(2):491–496

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brutsaert WH (1982) Evaporation into the Atmosphere. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, p 299

    Google Scholar 

  11. Clerc M, Kennedy J (2002) The particle swarm-explosion, stability, and convergence in a multidimensional complex space. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(1):58–73

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dang NM, Tran Anh D, Dang TD (2019) ANN optimized by PSO and Firefly algorithms for predicting scour depths around bridge piers. Eng Comput 35:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dogan E, Isik S, Sandalci M (2007) Estimation of daily evaporation using artificial neural networks. Tek Dergi 18(2):4119–4131

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dorigo M (1992) Optimization, learning and natural algorithms. PhD thesis. Politecnico di Milano, Italy

  15. Floudas CA, Pardolos PM (2009) Encyclopedia of optimization, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  16. Eberhart R, Kennedy J (1995) Particle swarm optimization. Proc IEEE Int Conf Neural Netw 4:1942–1948

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ghorbani MA, Deo RC, Yaseen ZM, Kashani MH, Mohammadi B (2018) Pan evaporation prediction using a hybrid multilayer perceptron-firefly algorithm (MLP-FFA) model: case study in North Iran. Theoret Appl Climatol 133(3):1119–1131

    Google Scholar 

  18. Goyal MK, Bharti B, Quilty J, Adamowski J, Pandey A (2014) Modeling of daily pan evaporation in sub-tropical climates using ANN, LS-SVR, Fuzzy Logic, and ANFIS. Expert Syst Appl 41(11):5267–5276

    Google Scholar 

  19. Guo Y, Zhang Y, Ma N, Xu J, Zhang T (2019) Long-term changes in evaporation over Siling Co Lake on the Tibetan Plateau and its impact on recent rapid lake expansion. Atmos Res 216:141–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Haghnegahdar L, Wang Y (2020) A whale optimization algorithm-trained artificial neural network for smart grid cyber intrusion detection. Neural Comput Appl 32(13):9427–9441

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2009) The elements of statistical learning: data mining inference and prediction, 2nd edn. California, Springer

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Haykin S (1999) Neural network and its application in IR, a comprehensive foundation, Upper Saddle Rever. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, p 842 (13, 775–781)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Heidari AA, Mirjalili S, Faris H, Aljarah I, Mafarja M, Chen H (2019) Harris hawks optimization: algorithm and applications. Futur Gener Comput Syst 97:849–872

    Google Scholar 

  24. Holmes TR (2019) Remote sensing techniques for estimating evaporation. In extreme hydroclimatic events and multivariate hazards in a changing environment. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 129–143

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jackson RD (1985) Evaluating evapotranspiration at local and regional scales. Proc IEEE 73(6):1086–1096

    Google Scholar 

  26. Karimi-Googhari S (2010) Daily pan evaporation estimation using a neuro-fuzzy based model. Trends Agric Eng 2010:191–195

    Google Scholar 

  27. Karkheiran S, Kabiri-Samani A, Zekri M, Azamathulla HM (2019) Scour at bridge piers in uniform and armored beds under steady and unsteady flow conditions using ANN-APSO and ANN-GA algorithms. ISH J Hydraul Eng 25:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  28. Keskin ME, Terzi O (2006) Artificial neural network models of daily pan evaporation. J Hydrol Eng 11(1):65–70

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kim S, Kim HS (2008) Neural networks and genetic algorithm approach for nonlinear evaporation and evapotranspiration modeling. J Hydrol 351(3–4):299–317

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kim S, Singh VP, Seo Y (2014) Evaluation of pan evaporation modeling with two different neural networks and weather station data. Theoret Appl Climatol 117(1–2):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kiran NR, Ravi V (2008) Software reliability prediction by soft computing techniques. J Syst Softw 81(4):576–583

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kirkpatrick S, Gellat CD, Vecchi MP (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220:670–680

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Kisi O, Cimen M (2011) A wavelet-support vector machine conjunction model for monthly streamflow forecasting. J Hydrol 399:132–140

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kisi O (2005) Discussion of ‘“Fuzzy logic model approaches to daily pan evaporation estimation in western Turkey.”’ Hydrol Sci J 50(4):727–728

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kisi O (2006) Daily pan evaporation modelling using a neuro-fuzzy computing technique. J Hydrol 329(3–4):636–646

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kisi O (2009) Daily pan evaporation modelling using multi-layer perceptrons and radial basis neural networks. Hydrol Process 23(2):213–223

    Google Scholar 

  37. Makridakis S, Andersen A, Carbone R, Fildes R, Hibon M, Lewandowski R, Winkler R (1982) The accuracy of extrapolation (time series) methods: results of a forecasting competition. J Forecasting 1(2):111–153

    Google Scholar 

  38. Malik A, Kumar A (2015) Pan evaporation simulation based on daily meteorological data using soft computing techniques and multiple linear regression. Water Resour Manage 29(6):1859–1872

    Google Scholar 

  39. Milan SG, Roozbahani A, Azar NA, Javadi S (2021) Development of adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system–evolutionary algorithms hybrid models (ANFIS-EA) for prediction of optimal groundwater exploitation. J Hydrol 598:126258

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mirjalili S, Lewis A (2016) The whale optimization algorithm. Adv Eng Softw 95:51–67

    Google Scholar 

  41. Moayedi H, Gör M, Lyu Z, Bui DT (2020) Herding Behaviors of grasshopper and Harris hawk for hybridizing the neural network in predicting the soil compression coefficient. Measurement 152:107389

    Google Scholar 

  42. Moghaddamnia A, Gosheh MG, Nuraie M, Mansuri MA, Han D (2010) Performance evaluation of LLR, SVM, CGNN and BFGSNN models to evaporation estimation. Energy Environ Eng S 5:108–113

    Google Scholar 

  43. Najafzadeh M, Tafarojnoruz A, Lim SY (2017) Prediction of local scour depth downstream of sluice gates using data-driven models. ISH J Hydraul Eng 23(2):195–202

    Google Scholar 

  44. Nourani V, Elkiran G, Abdullahi J (2019) Multi-station artificial intelligence based ensemble modelling of reference evaporationspiration using pan evaporation measurements. J Hydrol 577:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  45. Nourani V, Sayyah Fard M (2012) Sensitivity analysis of the artificial neural network outputs in simulation of the evaporation process at different climatologic regimes. Adv Eng Softw 47(1):127–146

    Google Scholar 

  46. Piri J et al (2009) Daily pan evaporation modeling in a hot and dry climate. J Hydrol Eng 14(8):803–811

    Google Scholar 

  47. Samadianfard S, Hashemi S, Kargar K, Izadyar M, Mostafaeipour A, Mosavi A et al (2020) Wind speed prediction using a hybrid model of the multi-layer perceptron and whale optimization algorithm. Energy Rep 6:1147–1159

    Google Scholar 

  48. Sammen SS, Ghorbani MA, Malik A, Tikhamarine Y, AmirRahmani M, Al-Ansari N, Chau KW (2020) Enhanced artificial neural network with harris hawks optimization for predicting scour depth downstream of ski-jump spillway. Appl Sci 10(15):5160

    Google Scholar 

  49. Samui P, Dixon B (2012) Application of support vector machine and relevance vector machine to determine evaporative losses in reservoirs. Hydrol Process 26(9):1361–1369

    Google Scholar 

  50. Sanikhani H, Kisi O, Nikpour MR, Dinpashoh Y (2012) Estimation of daily pan evaporation using two different adaptive neuro-fuzzy computing techniques. Water Resour Manage 26(15):4347–4365

    Google Scholar 

  51. Seifi A, Riahi H (2018) Estimating daily reference evapotranspiration using hybrid gamma test-least square support vectormachine, gamma test-ANN, and gamma test-ANFIS models in an arid area of Iran. J Water Clim Change. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2018.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Sharifan H, Ghahreman B, Alizadeh A, Mirlatifi SM (2006) Comparion of the different methods of estimated reference evapotranspiration (compound and temperature) with standard method and analysis of aridity effects. J Agric Sci Nat Resour 13:19–30 (In Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Sudheer KP, Gosain AK, Mohana Rangan D, Saheb SM (2002) Modelling evaporation using an artificial neural network algorithm. Hydrol Process 16(16):3189–3202

    Google Scholar 

  54. Talbi EG (2009) Metaheuristics: from design to implementation. Wiley, Chichester

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  55. Terzi Ö, Keskin ME (2008) Comparison of artificial neural networks and empirical equations to estimate daily pan evaporation. Irrigat Drain. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Tikhamarine Y, Malik A, Kumar A, Souag-Gamane D, Kisi O (2019) Estimation of monthly reference evapotranspiration using novel hybrid machine learning approaches. Hydrol Sci J 64(15):1824–1842

    Google Scholar 

  57. Tran-Ngoc H, Khatir S, Ho-Khac H, De Roeck G, Bui-Tien T, Wahab MA (2021) Efficient Artificial neural networks based on a hybrid metaheuristic optimization algorithm for damage detection in laminated composite structures. Compos Struct 262:113339

    Google Scholar 

  58. Vaheddoost B, Kocak K (2019) Temporal dynamics of monthly evaporation in Lake Urmia. Theoret Appl Climatol 137(3–4):2451–2462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-018-2747-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Wang B, Ma Y, Ma W, Su B, Dong X (2018) Evaluation of ten methods for estimating evaporation in a small high-elevation lake on the Tibetan Plateau. Theoret Appl Climatol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-018-2539-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Wang W, Lee X, Xiao W, Liu S, Schultz N, Wang Y et al (2018) Global lake evaporation accelerated by changes in surface energy allocation in a warmer climate. Nat Geosci 11(6):410. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0114-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Yang XS (2008) Nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithms. Luniver Press

  62. Yang XS, Deb S (2010) Engineering optimization by cuckoo search. Int J Math Modell Num Optimiz 1(4):330–343

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  63. Zhao G, Gao H (2019) Estimating reservoir evaporation losses for the United States: fusing remote sensing and modeling approaches. Remote Sens Environ 226:109–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.03.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Zhou Y, Niu Y, Luo Q, Jiang M (2020) Teaching learning-based whale optimization algorithm for multi-layer perceptron neural network training [J]. Math Biosci Eng 17(5):5987–6025

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

    Naser Arya Azar

  2. Department of Civil Engineering, Azarabaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran

    Nazila Kardan

  3. Department of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, Aburaihan Campus, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

    Sami Ghordoyee Milan

Authors
  1. Naser Arya Azar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nazila Kardan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sami Ghordoyee Milan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nazila Kardan.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arya Azar, N., Kardan, N. & Ghordoyee Milan, S. Developing the artificial neural network–evolutionary algorithms hybrid models (ANN–EA) to predict the daily evaporation from dam reservoirs. Engineering with Computers 39, 1375–1393 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-021-01523-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-021-01523-3

Keywords