Skip to main content
Log in

Nonlinear vibration analysis of bidirectional porous beams

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents nonlinear vibration behavior of shear deformable bidirectional porous beams with non-uniform porosity distribution. A new porosity distributions are proposed to maximize natural frequencies of the porous beam. It is assumed that closed-cell voids are distributed along the thickness and length of the beam. Hamilton principle is used to derive nonlinear governing equations using Reddy beam theory considering von Karman geometrical nonlinearity. Generalized differential quadrature method, harmonic balance approach along with the Picard iterative approach are used to discretize and solve the nonlinear dynamic equations. The variation of nonlinear frequency versus the vibration amplitude is highlighted considering various influential factors such as geometrical parameters, porosity distributions, beam theories and boundary conditions. It is shown that the newly defined porosity distribution can increase the frequencies in comparison to the conventional porosity distribution. Comparing beams of the same weight shows that porosities near the center of the beam further increases frequencies in comparison to the other porosity distributions. Moreover, bidirectional porosity increases the frequencies in comparison to the unidirectional porosity. Frequencies of the bidirectional porous Reddy beam depend not only on the bending stiffness, as in the case of unidirectional porous beam, but also on the first derivative of the bending stiffness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The raw/processed data required to reproduce these findings cannot be shared at this time as the data also form part of an ongoing study.

References

  1. Betts C (2012) Benefits of metal foams and developments in modelling techniques to assess their materials behaviour: a review. Mater Sci Technol 28:129–143

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dukhan N (2013) Metal foams: fundamentals and applications. Destech Publications Inc

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lefebvre LP, Banhart J, Dunand DC (2008) Porous metals and metallic foams: current status and recent developments. Adv Eng Mater 10:775–787

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gao K, Gao W, Wu B, Wu D, Song C (2018) Nonlinear primary resonance of functionally graded porous cylindrical shells using the method of multiple scales. Thin-Walled Struct 125:281–293

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tang H, Li L, Hu Y (2018) Buckling analysis of two-directionally porous beam. Aerosp Sci Technol 78:471–479

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lia K, Wu D, Chen X, Cheng J, Liu Z, Gao W, Liu M (2018) Isogeometric Analysis of functionally graded porous plates reinforced by graphene platelets. Compos Struct 204:114–130

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pompe W, Worch H, Epple M, Friess W, Gelinsky M, Greil P, Hempele U, Scharnweber D, Schulter K (2003) Functionally graded materials for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng A 362:40–60

    Google Scholar 

  8. Smith BH, Szyniszewski S, Hajjar JF, Schafer BW, Arwade SR (2012) Steel foam for structures: a review of applications, manufacturing and material properties. J Constr Steel Res 71:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fan F, Xu Y, Sahmani S, Safaei B (2020) Modified couple stress-based geometrically nonlinear oscillations of porous functionally graded microplates using NURBS-based isogeometric approach. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 372:113400

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Zargar O, Mollaghaee-Roozbahani M, Bashirpour M, Baghani M (2019) The application of homotopy analysis method to determine the thermal response of convective-radiative porous fins with temperature-dependent properties. Int J Appl Mech 11:1950089

    Google Scholar 

  11. Currey JD (1988) The effect of porosity and mineral content on the Young’s modulus of elasticity of compact bone. J Biomech 21:131–139

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rice RW (1989) Relation of tensile strength-porosity effects in ceramics to porosity dependence of Young’s modulus and fracture energy, porosity character and grain size. Mater Sci Eng A 112:215–224

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rice RW (1993) Comparison of stress concentration versus minimum solid area based mechanical property-porosity relations. J Mater Sci 28:2187–2190

    Google Scholar 

  14. Roberts AP, Garboczi EJ (2000) Elastic properties of model porous ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 83:3041–3048

    Google Scholar 

  15. Roberts AP, Garboczi EJ (2002) Elastic properties of model random three-dimensional open-cell solids. J Mech Phys Solids 50:33–55

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Roberts AP, Garboczi EJ (2001) Elastic moduli of model random three-dimensional closed-cell cellular solids. Acta Mater 49:189–197

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1997) Cellular solids: structure and properties. Cambridge University Press

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Chiu SN, Stoyan D, Kendall WS, Mecke J (2013) Stochastic geometry and its applications. Wiley

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Roberts AP, Garboczi EJ (1999) Elastic properties of a tungsten–silver composite by reconstruction and computation. J Mech Phys Solids 47:2029–2055

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Roberts AP (1997) Morphology and thermal conductivity of model organic aerogels. Phys Rev E 55:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  21. Safaei B (2020) The effect of embedding a porous core on the free vibration behavior of laminated composite plates. Steel Compos Struct 35:659–670

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kitipornchai S, Chen D, Yang J (2017) Free vibration and elastic buckling of functionally graded porous beams reinforced by graphene platelets. Mater Des 116:656–665

    Google Scholar 

  23. Torres FG, Nazhat SN, Sheikh Md Fadzullah SH, Maquet V, Boccaccini AR (2007) Mechanical properties and bioactivity of porous PLGA/TiO2 nanoparticle-filled composites for tissue engineering scaffolds. Compos Sci Technol 67:1139–1147

    Google Scholar 

  24. Moradi-Dastjerdi R, Behdinan K, Safaei B, Qin Z (2020) Buckling behavior of porous CNT-reinforced plates integrated between active piezoelectric layers. Eng Struct 222:111141

    Google Scholar 

  25. De Giorgi M, Carofalo A, Dattoma V, Nobile R, Palano F (2010) Aluminium foams structural modelling. Comput Struct 88:25–35

    Google Scholar 

  26. Chen SX, Sahmani S, Safaei B (2021) Size-dependent nonlinear bending behavior of porous FGM quasi-3D microplates with a central cutout based on nonlocal strain gradient isogeometric finite element modelling. Eng Comput 37:1657–1678

    Google Scholar 

  27. Barati MR, Zenkour AM (2017) Post-buckling analysis of refined shear deformable graphene platelet reinforced beams with porosities and geometrical imperfection. Compos Struct 181:194–202

    Google Scholar 

  28. Fan F, Safaei B, Sahmani S (2021) Buckling and postbuckling response of nonlocal strain gradient porous functionally graded micro/nano-plates via NURBS-based isogeometric analysis. Thin-Walled Struct 159:107231

    Google Scholar 

  29. Chen D, Yang J, Kitipornchai S (2017) Nonlinear vibration and postbuckling of functionally graded graphene reinforced porous nanocomposite beams. Compos Sci Technol 142:235–245

    Google Scholar 

  30. Safaei B (2021) Frequency-dependent damped vibrations of multifunctional foam plates sandwiched and integrated by composite faces. Eur Phys J Plus. 136, Article number: 646

  31. Polit O, Anant C, Anirudh B, Ganapathi M (2019) Functionally graded graphene reinforced porous nanocomposite curved beams: bending and elastic stability using a higher-order model with thickness stretch effect. Compos B Eng 166:310–327

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tao C, Dai T (2021) Isogeometric analysis for postbuckling of sandwich cylindrical shell panels with graphene platelet reinforced functionally graded porous core. Compos Struct 260:113258

    Google Scholar 

  33. Safaei B, Moradi-Dastjerdi R, Behdinan K, Chu F (2019) Critical buckling temperature and force in porous sandwich plates with CNT-reinforced nanocomposite layers. Aerosp Sci Technol 91:175–185

    Google Scholar 

  34. Song R, Sahmani S, Safaei B (2021) Isogeometric nonlocal strain gradient quasi-three-dimensional plate model for thermal postbuckling of porous functionally graded microplates with central cutout with different shapes. Appl Math Mech 42:771–786

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Noori AR, Aslan TA, Temel B (2021) Dynamic analysis of functionally graded porous beams using complementary functions method in the Laplace domain. Compos Struct 256:113094

    Google Scholar 

  36. Srikarun B, Songsuwan W, Wattanasakulpong N (2021) Linear and nonlinear static bending of sandwich beams with functionally graded porous core under different distributed loads. Compos Struct 276:114538

    Google Scholar 

  37. Chen D, Yang J, Kitipornchai S (2015) Elastic buckling and static bending of shear deformable functionally graded porous beam. Compos Struct 133:54–61

    Google Scholar 

  38. Chen D, Yang J, Kitipornchai S (2016) Free and forced vibrations of shear deformable functionally graded porous beams. Int J Mech Sci 108–109:14–22

    Google Scholar 

  39. Gao K, Li R, Yang J (2019) Dynamic characteristics of functionally graded porous beams with interval material properties. Eng Struct 197:109441

    Google Scholar 

  40. Baghlani A, Najafgholipour MA, Khayat M (2021) The influence of mechanical uncertainties on the free vibration of functionally graded graphene-reinforced porous nanocomposite shells of revolution. Eng Struct 228:111356

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wu D, Liu A, Huang Y, Huang Y, Pi Y, Gao W (2018) Dynamic analysis of functionally graded porous structures through finite element analysis. Eng Struct 165:287–301

    Google Scholar 

  42. Zhao J, Wang Q, Deng X, Choe K, Xie F, Shuai C (2019) A modified series solution for free vibration analyses of moderately thick functionally graded porous (FGP) deep curved and straight beams. Compos B Eng 165:155–166

    Google Scholar 

  43. Xie B, Sahmani S, Safaei B, Xu B (2021) Nonlinear secondary resonance of FG porous silicon nanobeams under periodic hard excitations based on surface elasticity theory. Eng Comput 37:1611–1634

    Google Scholar 

  44. Keleshteri MM, Jelovica J (2020) Nonlinear vibration behavior of functionally graded porous cylindrical panels. Compos Struct 239:112028

    Google Scholar 

  45. Keleshteri MM, Asadi H, Wang Q (2017) Large amplitude vibration of FG-CNT reinforced composite annular plates with integrated piezoelectric layers on elastic foundation. Thin-Walled Struct 120:203–214

    Google Scholar 

  46. Saini R, Lal R (2020) Axisymmetric vibrations of temperature-dependent functionally graded moderately thick circular plates with two-dimensional material and temperature distribution. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01056-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Sahmani S, Safaei B (2019) Nonlocal strain gradient nonlinear resonance of bi-directional functionally graded composite micro/nano-beams under periodic soft excitation. Thin-Walled Struct 143:106226

    Google Scholar 

  48. Mohammadzadeh-Keleshteri M, Asadi H, Aghdam MM (2017) Geometrical nonlinear free vibration responses of FG-CNT reinforced composite annular sector plates integrated with piezoelectric layers. Compos Struct 171:100–112

    Google Scholar 

  49. Javani M, Kiani Y, Eslami MR (2019) Large amplitude thermally induced vibrations of temperature dependent annular FGM plates. Compos B Eng 163:371–383

    Google Scholar 

  50. Babaee A, Jelovica J (2021) Nonlinear transient thermoelastic response of FGM plate under sudden cryogenic cooling. Ocean Eng 226:108875

    Google Scholar 

  51. Keleshteri MM, Asadi H, Wang Q (2018) On the snap-through instability of post-buckled FG-CNTRC rectangular plates with integrated piezoelectric layers. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 331:53–71

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. Ashraf MA, Liu Z, Zhang D, Pham BT (2020) Effects of elastic foundation on the large-amplitude vibration analysis of functionally graded GPL-RC annular sector plates. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01068-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Fan L, Sahmani S, Safaei B (2021) Couple stress-based dynamic stability analysis of functionally graded composite truncated conical microshells with magnetostrictive facesheets embedded within nonlinear viscoelastic foundations. Eng Comput 37:1635–1655

    Google Scholar 

  54. Hamed MA, Abo-bakr RM, Mohamed SA, Eltaher MA (2020) Influence of axial load function and optimization on static stability of sandwich functionally graded beams with porous core. Eng Comput 36:1929–1946

    Google Scholar 

  55. Mohammadsalehi M, Zargar O, Baghani M (2017) Study of non-uniform viscoelastic nanoplates vibration based on nonlocal first-order shear deformation theory. Meccanica 52:1063–1077

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. Jalali MH, Shahriari B, Zargar O, Baghani M, Baniassadi M (2018) Free Vibration analysis of rotating functionally graded annular disc of variable thickness using generalized differential quadrature method. Sci Iran Trans B Mech Eng 25:728–740

    Google Scholar 

  57. Reddy JN (2004) Mechanics of laminated composite plates and shells: theory and analysis. CRC Press LLC

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  58. Heyliger PR, Reddy JN (1988) A higher order beam finite element for bending and vibration problems. J Sound Vib 126:309–326

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  59. Roberts AP, Garboczi EJ (2002) Computation of the linear elastic properties of random porous materials with a wide variety of microstructure. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A: Math Phys Eng Sci 458:1033–1054

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  60. Bellman R, Casti J (1971) Differential quadrature and long-term integration. J Math Anal Appl 34:235–238

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  61. Shu C, Richards BE (1992) Application of generalized differential quadrature to solve two-dimensional incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 15:791–798

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  62. Shu C, Wang CM (1999) Treatment of mixed and nonuniform boundary conditions in GDQ vibration analysis of rectangular plates. Eng Struct 21:125–134

    Google Scholar 

  63. Bert CW, Malik M (1996) Differential quadrature method in computational mechanics: a review. Appl Mech Rev 49:1–28

    Google Scholar 

  64. Wang Y, Feng C, Yang J, Zhou D, Wang S (2021) Nonlinear vibration of FG-GPLRC dielectric plate with active tuning using differential quadrature method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 379:113761

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  65. Tornabene F, Viola E (2007) Vibration analysis of spherical structural elements using the GDQ method. Comput Math Appl 53:1538–1560

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the financial support by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [grant number RGPIN-2017-04509 and IRCPJ 550069-19].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. M. Keleshteri.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Elements of the stiffness \(\left({K}_{ij}\right)\) and mass \(\left({M}_{ij}\right)\) matrices of the bidirectional porous beams are:

$$ K_{11} = A_{xx} \frac{{\partial^{2} }}{{\partial x^{2} }} + \frac{{\partial A_{xx} }}{\partial x}\frac{\partial }{\partial x} $$
$$ K_{12} = 0 $$
$$ K_{13} = A_{xx} \frac{\partial }{\partial x}\frac{{\partial^{2} }}{{\partial x^{2} }} + \frac{{\partial A_{xx} }}{\partial x}\frac{1}{2}\left( {\frac{\partial }{\partial x}} \right)^{2} $$
$$ K_{21} = A_{xx} \frac{\partial w}{{\partial x}}\frac{{\partial^{2} }}{{\partial x^{2} }} + \frac{{\partial A_{xx} }}{\partial x}\frac{\partial w}{{\partial x}}\frac{\partial }{\partial x} + A_{xx} \frac{{\partial^{2} w}}{{\partial x^{2} }}\frac{\partial }{\partial x} $$
$$ \begin{aligned} K_{22} =\, & c_{1} \left( {c_{1} A_{xz} - c_{2} D_{xz} } \right)\frac{\partial }{\partial x} + c_{1} \left( {c_{1} \frac{{\partial A_{xz} }}{\partial x} - c_{2} \frac{{\partial D_{xz} }}{\partial x}} \right) \\ & - c_{2} \left( {c_{1} D_{xz} - c_{2} F_{xz} } \right)\frac{\partial }{\partial x} - c_{2} \left( {c_{1} \frac{{\partial D_{xz} }}{\partial x} - c_{2} \frac{{\partial F_{xz} }}{\partial x}} \right) \\ & + c_{3} \left( \begin{gathered} c_{1} \frac{{\partial^{2} F_{xx} }}{{\partial x^{2} }}\frac{\partial }{\partial x} + 2c_{1} \frac{{\partial F_{xx} }}{\partial x}\frac{{\partial^{2} }}{{\partial x^{2} }} + F_{xx} c_{1} \frac{{\partial^{3} }}{{\partial x^{3} }} \hfill \\ - c_{3} \frac{{\partial^{2} H_{xx} }}{{\partial x^{2} }}\frac{\partial }{\partial x} - 2c_{3} \frac{{\partial H_{xx} }}{\partial x}\frac{{\partial^{2} }}{{\partial x^{2} }} - c_{3} H_{xx} \frac{{\partial^{3} }}{{\partial x^{3} }} \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \right) \\ \end{aligned} $$
$$ \begin{aligned} K_{23} = & \left( {A_{xx} \frac{\partial w}{{\partial x}}\frac{{\partial^{2} w}}{{\partial x^{2} }} + \frac{1}{2}\frac{{\partial A_{xx} }}{\partial x}\left( {\frac{\partial w}{{\partial x}}} \right)^{2} } \right)\frac{\partial }{\partial x} \\ & + \frac{1}{2}A_{xx} \left( {\frac{\partial w}{{\partial x}}} \right)^{2} \frac{{\partial^{2} }}{{\partial x^{2} }} + \left( {1 - c_{0} } \right)\left( \begin{gathered} \left( {c_{1} A_{xz} - c_{2} D_{xz} } \right)\frac{{\partial^{2} }}{{\partial x^{2} }} \hfill \\ + \left( {c_{1} \frac{{\partial A_{xz} }}{\partial x} - c_{2} \frac{{\partial D_{xz} }}{\partial x}} \right)\frac{\partial }{\partial x} \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \right) \\ & - c_{2} \left( {\left( {c_{1} D_{xz} - c_{2} F_{xz} } \right)\frac{{\partial^{2} }}{{\partial x^{2} }} + \left( {c_{1} \frac{{\partial D_{xz} }}{\partial x} - c_{2} \frac{{\partial F_{xz} }}{\partial x}} \right)\frac{\partial }{\partial x}} \right) \\ & - c_{3} \left( \begin{gathered} c_{0} \frac{{\partial^{2} F_{xx} }}{{\partial x^{2} }}\frac{{\partial^{2} }}{{\partial x^{2} }} + 2c_{0} \frac{{\partial F_{xx} }}{\partial x}\frac{{\partial^{3} }}{{\partial x^{3} }} + F_{xx} c_{0} \frac{{\partial^{4} }}{{\partial x^{4} }} \hfill \\ + c_{3} \frac{{\partial^{2} H_{xx} }}{{\partial x^{2} }}\frac{{\partial^{2} }}{{\partial x^{2} }} + 2c_{3} \frac{{\partial H_{xx} }}{\partial x}\frac{{\partial^{3} }}{{\partial x^{3} }} + c_{3} H_{xx} \frac{{\partial^{4} }}{{\partial x^{4} }} \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \right) \\ \end{aligned} $$
$$ K_{31} = 0 $$
$$\begin{aligned}{K_{32}} = &c_1^2\left( {{D_{xx}}\frac{{{\partial ^2}}}{{\partial {x^2}}} + \frac{{\partial {D_{xx}}}}{{\partial x}}\frac{\partial }{{\partial x}}} \right)\\& - 2{c_1}{c_3}\left( {{F_{xx}}\frac{{{\partial ^2}}}{{\partial {x^2}}} + \frac{{\partial {F_{xx}}}}{{\partial x}}\frac{\partial }{{\partial x}}} \right) \\& +c_3^2\left( {{H_{xx}}\frac{{{\partial ^2}}}{{\partial {x^2}}} + \frac{{\partial {H_{xx}}}}{{\partial x}}\frac{\partial }{{\partial x}}} \right) \\&- {c_1}\left( {{c_1}{A_{xz}} - {c_2}{D_{xz}}} \right)\\& + {c_2}\left( {{c_1}{D_{xz}} - {c_2}{F_{xz}}} \right)\end{aligned}$$
$$ \begin{aligned} K_{33} = & - c_{1} c_{0} \left( {D_{xx} \frac{{\partial^{3} }}{{\partial x^{3} }} + \frac{{\partial D_{xx} }}{\partial x}\frac{{\partial^{2} }}{{\partial x^{2} }}} \right) \\ & - c_{1} c_{3} \left( {F_{xx} \frac{{\partial^{3} }}{{\partial x^{3} }} + \frac{{\partial F_{xx} }}{\partial x}\frac{{\partial^{2} }}{{\partial x^{2} }}} \right) \\ & + c_{3} c_{0} \left( {F_{xx} \frac{{\partial^{3} }}{{\partial x^{3} }} + \frac{{\partial F_{xx} }}{\partial x}\frac{{\partial^{2} }}{{\partial x^{2} }}} \right) \\ & + c_{3}^{2} \left( {H_{xx} \frac{{\partial^{3} }}{{\partial x^{3} }} + \frac{{\partial H_{xx} }}{\partial x}\frac{{\partial^{2} }}{{\partial x^{2} }}} \right) \\ & - \left( \begin{gathered} \left( {1 - c_{0} } \right)\left( {c_{1} A_{xz} - c_{2} D_{xz} } \right) \hfill \\ - c_{2} \left( {c_{1} D_{xz} - c_{2} F_{xz} } \right) \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \right)\frac{\partial }{\partial x} \\ \end{aligned} $$
$$ M_{11} = I_{0} ;\quad M_{12} = J_{1} ;\quad M_{13} = - K_{1} \frac{\partial }{\partial x} $$
$$ \begin{aligned} & {\text{M}}_{21} = - K_{1} \frac{\partial }{\partial x}{ };{\text{ M}}_{22} = - \left( {c_{1} K_{2} - c_{3} K_{4} } \right)\frac{\partial }{\partial x}{ };\\&{\text{ M}}_{23} = \left( {c_{0} K_{2} + c_{3} K_{4} } \right)\frac{{\partial^{2} }}{{\partial x^{2} }} + I_{0} \end{aligned} $$
$$ {\text{M}}_{31} = J_{1} { };{\text{ M}}_{32} = c_{1} J_{2} - c_{3} J_{4} { };{\text{ M}}_{33} = - \left( {c_{0} J_{2} + c_{3} J_{4} } \right)\frac{\partial }{\partial x} $$

As an example, a discretized form of the first equation in the equation set 22 based on the GDQ method is given here:

$$ \begin{gathered} \delta u:\mathop \sum \limits_{j = 1}^{{N_{x} }} \left[ \begin{gathered} C_{{x_{ij} }}^{\left( 2 \right)} A_{xx} u\left( {x_{j} } \right) + C_{{x_{ij} }}^{\left( 1 \right)} \frac{{\partial A_{xx} }}{\partial x}u\left( {x_{j} } \right) \hfill \\ + C_{{x_{ij} }}^{\left( 3 \right)} A_{xx} w\left( {x_{j} } \right) + C_{{x_{ij} }}^{\left( 1 \right)} C_{{x_{ij} }}^{\left( 1 \right)} \frac{{\partial A_{xx} }}{\partial x}\frac{1}{2}\left( {w\left( {x_{j} } \right)} \right)^{2} \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \right] \hfill \\ \quad = \mathop \sum \limits_{i = 1}^{{N_{x} }} \left[ {I_{0} u\left( {x_{j} } \right) + J_{1} \phi \left( {x_{j} } \right) - K_{1} C_{{x_{ij} }}^{\left( 1 \right)} w\left( {x_{j} } \right)} \right], \hfill \\ i = 1,2, \ldots , N_{x} \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $$

In addition, the discretized boundary conditions can be obtained as follows. For instance, for the clamped boundaries at \(x=0\) and \(x=L\), following conditions on both ends of the beam should be satisfied.

$$ u = \phi = w = \mathop \sum \limits_{j = 1}^{{N_{x} }} C_{{x_{ij} }}^{\left( 1 \right)} w\left( {x_{j} } \right) = 0 $$

Similarly, the discretized boundary conditions for the case of simply supported edges can be obtained.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Keleshteri, M.M., Jelovica, J. Nonlinear vibration analysis of bidirectional porous beams. Engineering with Computers 38, 5033–5049 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-021-01553-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-021-01553-x

Keywords

Navigation