Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Novel topological and geometrical modelling of N-frequency geodesic icosahedron tensegrities

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We propose a novel graph-theoretical method for efficient generation of the topological structure of N-frequency geodesic icosahedron tensegrities. The method only requires the adjacency list of edges of an N-frequency icosahedron, and using a sophisticated approach, creates the major topological entities of the corresponding geodesic icosahedron tensegrity. The graph theory is used to build a bridge between a regular icosahedron and its dual complex tensegrity. The approach proposed is general and perfectly works on icosahedrons with any degree of frequency. The generation of edges is managed in such a way that enables us to group them in different sets as cables and struts. The spherical geodesic tensegrities generated using our method could remarkably extend the complex data sets and large-scale benchmark models required for researchers in the field of tensegrity structures. The whole process and its parts are described and illustrated step by step. Furthermore, the form-finding of 1 to 5-frequency geodesic icosahedron tensegrities is also performed, and sets of self-equilibrium force densities corresponding to their super-stable geometries are provided. The results clearly demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method for automated modelling of the icosahedron tensegrities with a chosen frequency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sultan C (2009) Chapter 2 tensegrity: 60 years of art, science, and engineering. Advances in applied mechanics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 69–145

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tibert AG, Pellegrino S (2002) Deployable tensegrity reflectors for small satellites. J Spacecr Rockets 39:701–709

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yildiz K, Lesieutre GA (2022) Sizing and prestress optimization of Class-2 tensegrity structures for space boom applications. Eng Comput 38:1451–1464

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yildiz K, Lesieutre GA (2020) Deployment of n-strut cylindrical tensegrity booms. J Struct Eng 146:4020247

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen M, Goyal R, Majji M, Skelton RE (2021) Deployable tensegrity lunar tower. Earth and Space 2021:1079–1092

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen M, Goyal R, Majji M, Skelton RE (2021) Review of space habitat designs for long term space explorations. Prog Aerosp Sci 122:100692

    Google Scholar 

  7. Liu K, Wu J, Paulino GH, Qi HJ (2017) Programmable deployment of tensegrity structures by stimulus-responsive polymers. Sci Rep 7:3511

    Google Scholar 

  8. Motro R (2003) Tensegrity: structural systems for the future. Butterworth-Heinemann, London

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rhode-Barbarigos L, Ali NBH, Motro R, Smith IFC (2010) Designing tensegrity modules for pedestrian bridges. Eng Struct 32:1158–1167

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fraternali F, Santos F (2019) Mechanical modeling of superelastic tensegrity braces for earthquake-proof structures. Extrem Mech Lett 33:100578

    Google Scholar 

  11. Skelton RE, Fraternali F, Carpentieri G, Micheletti A (2014) Minimum mass design of tensegrity bridges with parametric architecture and multiscale complexity. Mech Res Commun 58:124–132

    Google Scholar 

  12. Quirant J, Kazi-Aoual MN, Motro R (2003) Designing tensegrity systems: the case of a double layer grid. Eng Struct 25:1121–1130

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rhode-Barbarigos L, Jain H, Kripakaran P, Smith IFC (2010) Design of tensegrity structures using parametric analysis and stochastic search. Eng Comput 26:193–203

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shea K, Fest E, Smith IFC (2002) Developing intelligent tensegrity structures with stochastic search. Adv Eng Informatics 16:21–40

    Google Scholar 

  15. Moored KW, Kemp TH, Houle NE, Bart-Smith H (2011) Analytical predictions, optimization, and design of a tensegrity-based artificial pectoral fin. Int J Solids Struct 48:3142–3159

    Google Scholar 

  16. Luo Y, Xu X, Lele T et al (2008) A multimodular tensegrity model of an actin stress fiber. J Biomech 41:2379–2387

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ingber DE (2003) Tensegrity I. Cell structure and hierarchical systems biology. J Cell Sci 116(7):1157–1173

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang L-Y, Zheng Y, Yin X et al (2022) A tensegrity-based morphing module for assembling various deployable structures. Mech Mach Theory 173:104870

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ingber DE, Wang N, Stamenović D (2014) Tensegrity, cellular biophysics, and the mechanics of living systems. Reports Prog Phys 77:46603

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu Y, Bi Q, Yue X et al (2022) A review on tensegrity structures-based robots. Mech Mach Theory 168:104571

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kobayashi R, Nabae H, Endo G, Suzumori K (2022) Soft tensegrity robot driven by thin artificial muscles for the exploration of unknown spatial configurations. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 7:5349–5356

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ma Y, Zhang Q, Dobah Y et al (2018) Meta-tensegrity: design of a tensegrity prism with metal rubber. Compos Struct 206:644–657

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fraternali F, Carpentieri G, Amendola A et al (2014) Multiscale tunability of solitary wave dynamics in tensegrity metamaterials. Appl Phys Lett 105:201903

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fraternali F, Senatore L, Daraio C (2012) Solitary waves on tensegrity lattices. J Mech Phys Solids 60:1137–1144

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rimoli JJ, Pal RK (2017) Mechanical response of 3-dimensional tensegrity lattices. Compos Part B Eng 115:30–42

    Google Scholar 

  26. Liu K, Zegard T, Pratapa PP, Paulino GH (2019) Unraveling tensegrity tessellations for metamaterials with tunable stiffness and bandgaps. J Mech Phys Solids 131:147–166

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. De Tommasi D, Marano GC, Puglisi G, Trentadue F (2017) Morphological optimization of tensegrity-type metamaterials. Compos Part B Eng 115:182–187

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang J, Ohsaki M, Rimoli JJ, Kogiso K (2021) Optimization for energy absorption of 3-dimensional tensegrity lattice with truncated octahedral units. Compos Struct 267:113903

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bauer J, Kraus JA, Crook C et al (2021) Tensegrity metamaterials: toward failure-resistant engineering systems through delocalized deformation. Adv Mater 33:2005647

    Google Scholar 

  30. Koohestani K (2017) On the analytical form-finding of tensegrities. Compos Struct 166:114–119

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang L-Y, Zhu S-X, Li S-X, Xu G-K (2018) Analytical form-finding of tensegrities using determinant of force-density matrix. Compos Struct 189:87–98

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang LY, Zhu SX, Chen XF, Xu GK (2019) Analytical form-finding for highly symmetric and super-stable configurations of rhombic truncated regular polyhedral tensegrities. J Appl Mech Trans ASME 86:031006

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang JY, Ohsaki M, Tsuura F (2019) Self-equilibrium and super-stability of truncated regular hexahedral and octahedral tensegrity structures. Int J Solids Struct 161:182–192

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang L-Y, Li Y, Cao Y et al (2012) Self-equilibrium and super-stability of truncated regular polyhedral tensegrity structures: a unified analytical solution. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 468:3323–3347

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Tibert AG, Pellegrino S (2003) Review of form-finding methods for tensegrity structures. Int J Sp Struct 18:209–223

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang JY, Ohsaki M (2012) Self-equilibrium and stability of regular truncated tetrahedral tensegrity structures. J Mech Phys Solids 60:1757–1770

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang JY, Ohsaki M (2006) Adaptive force density method for form-finding problem of tensegrity structures. Int J Solids Struct 43:5658–5673

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Estrada GG, Bungartz H-J, Mohrdieck C (2006) Numerical form-finding of tensegrity structures. Int J Solids Struct 43:6855–6868

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Tran HC, Lee J (2010) Advanced form-finding of tensegrity structures. Comput Struct 88:237–246

    Google Scholar 

  40. Tran HC, Lee J (2011) Form-finding of tensegrity structures with multiple states of self-stress. Acta Mech 222:131

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Koohestani K, Guest SD (2013) A new approach to the analytical and numerical form-finding of tensegrity structures. Int J Solids Struct 50:2995–3007

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wang Y, Xu X, Luo Y (2021) Form-finding of tensegrity structures via rank minimization of force density matrix. Eng Struct 227:111419

    Google Scholar 

  43. Tkachuk A (2022) Robustness of rank minimization heuristics for form-finding of tensegrity structures. Comput Struct 266:106786

    Google Scholar 

  44. Bui HQ, Kawabata M, Van NC (2022) A combination of genetic algorithm and dynamic relaxation method for practical form-finding of tensegrity structures. Adv Struct Eng 25:2237–2254

    Google Scholar 

  45. Zhang P, Zhou J, Chen J (2021) Form-finding of complex tensegrity structures using constrained optimization method. Compos Struct 268:113971

    Google Scholar 

  46. Zhang L-Y, Li Y, Cao Y-P, Feng X-Q (2014) Stiffness matrix based form-finding method of tensegrity structures. Eng Struct 58:36–48

    Google Scholar 

  47. Song K, Scarpa F, Schenk M (2022) Form-finding of tessellated tensegrity structures. Eng Struct 252:113627

    Google Scholar 

  48. Chen Y, Feng J, Wu Y (2012) Novel form-finding of tensegrity structures using ant colony systems. J Mech Robot 4:31001

    Google Scholar 

  49. Do DTT, Lee S, Lee J (2016) A modified differential evolution algorithm for tensegrity structures. Compos Struct 158:11–19

    Google Scholar 

  50. Koohestani K (2012) Form-finding of tensegrity structures via genetic algorithm. Int J Solids Struct 49:739–747

    Google Scholar 

  51. Li Y, Feng X-Q, Cao Y-P, Gao H (2010) A Monte Carlo form-finding method for large scale regular and irregular tensegrity structures. Int J Solids Struct 47:1888–1898

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. Chen Y, Yan J, Feng J, Sareh P (2020) A hybrid symmetry–PSO approach to finding the self-equilibrium configurations of prestressable pin-jointed assemblies. Acta Mech 231:1485–1501

    Google Scholar 

  53. Lee S, Lieu QX, Vo TP, Lee J (2022) Deep neural networks for form-finding of tensegrity structures. Mathematics 10:1–27

    Google Scholar 

  54. Trinh DTN, Lee S, Kang J, Lee J (2022) Force density-informed neural network for prestress design of tensegrity structures with multiple self-stress modes. Eur J Mech—A/Solids 94:104584

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  55. Ohsaki M, Zhang JY (2015) Nonlinear programming approach to form-finding and folding analysis of tensegrity structures using fictitious material properties. Int J Solids Struct 69–70:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  56. Koohestani K (2020) Innovative numerical form-finding of tensegrity structures. Int J Solids Struct 206:304–313

    Google Scholar 

  57. Koohestani K (2013) A computational framework for the form-finding and design of tensegrity structures. Mech Res Commun 54:41–49

    Google Scholar 

  58. Wang Y, Xu X, Luo Y (2021) A unifying framework for form-finding and topology-finding of tensegrity structures. Comput Struct 247:106486

    Google Scholar 

  59. Kanno Y (2013) Exploring new tensegrity structures via mixed integer programming. Struct Multidiscip Optim 48:95–114

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  60. Xu X, Wang Y, Luo Y (2018) Finding member connectivities and nodal positions of tensegrity structures based on force density method and mixed integer nonlinear programming. Eng Struct 166:240–250

    Google Scholar 

  61. Aloui O, Flores J, Orden D, Rhode-Barbarigos L (2019) Cellular morphogenesis of three-dimensional tensegrity structures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 346:85–108

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  62. Ma S, Chen M, Peng Z et al (2022) The equilibrium and form-finding of general tensegrity systems with rigid bodies. Eng Struct 266:114618

    Google Scholar 

  63. Murakami H, Nishimura Y (2001) Static and dynamic characterization of regular truncated icosahedral and dodecahedral tensegrity modules. Int J Solids Struct 38:9359–9381

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  64. Fuller RB (1982) Synergetics: explorations in the geometry of thinking. Estate of R. Buckminster Fuller, Sebastopol, CA

    Google Scholar 

  65. West DB. (2001) Introduction to graph theory. Prentice hall Upper Saddle River

  66. Connelly R, Back A (1998) Mathematics and tensegrity: Group and representation theory make it possible to form a complete catalogue of “strut-cable” constructions with prescribed symmetries. Am Sci 86:142–151

    Google Scholar 

  67. Zhang JY, Ohsaki M (2007) Stability conditions for tensegrity structures. Int J Solids Struct 44:3875–3886

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  68. Connelly R. (2002) Tensegrity structures: why are They Stable? BT-rigidity theory and applications. In: Thorpe MF, Duxbury M (eds). Springer, US Boston MA, pp 47–54

  69. Guest SD (2010) The stiffness of tensegrity structures. IMA J Appl Math 76:57–66

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  70. Cai J, Wang X, Yang R, Feng J (2018) Mechanical behavior of tensegrity structures with High-mode imperfections. Mech Res Commun 94:58–63

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Structural Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

    K. Koohestani

Authors
  1. K. Koohestani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Koohestani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author has no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koohestani, K. Novel topological and geometrical modelling of N-frequency geodesic icosahedron tensegrities. Engineering with Computers 38, 5733–5745 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-022-01750-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-022-01750-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation