Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A novel enriched degree of freedom method for absorbing boundary conditions in the time-domain finite element method

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes an enriched degree of freedom method for absorbing boundary conditions in the time-domain finite element method (TD-FEM). In the proposed method, to reduce the reflection of the elastic waves from the artificial boundary, nodes in the absorbing domain are first enriched by additional degrees of freedom to damp the outgoing elastic waves. Next, based on the motion law of the enriched degree of freedom, a novel damping method is developed to further dampen the oscillation on the enriched degree of freedom. Then, through combination with the modified Newmark algorithm, the proposed method can be employed to efficiently absorb outgoing elastic waves. Finally, numerical tests are conducted to validate the feasibility and application of the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rethore J, Gravouil A, Combescure A (2004) A stable numerical scheme for the finite element simulation of dynamic crack propagation with remeshing. Comput Method Appl M 193(42–44):4493–4510

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu FS (2022) Modeling cohesive fracture propagation in partially saturated porous media with the assumed enhanced strain method. Acta Geotech 17(5):1605–1626

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen YJ, Mobasher ME, Gu CS, Zheng DJ, Waisman H (2022) Thermodynamically consistent non-local damage formulation for fluid-driven fracture in poro-viscoelastic media. Acta Geotech

  4. Chen J, Shou Y, Zhou X (2022) Implementation of the novel perfectly matched layer element for elastodynamic problems in time-domain finite element method. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 152:107054

    Google Scholar 

  5. Teng ZH, Sun F, Wu SC, Zhang ZB, Chen T, Liao DM (2018) An adaptively refined XFEM with virtual node polygonal elements for dynamic crack problems. Comput Mech 62(5):1087–1106

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Sun W, Fish J, Liu FS, Lu Y (2022) A stabilized two-phase PD-FEM coupling approach for modeling partially saturated porous media. Acta Geotech

  7. Xu C, Dai R, Dong CY, Yang HS (2021) RI-IGABEM based on generalized-alpha method in 2D and 3D elastodynamic problems. Comput Method Appl M 383

  8. Saksala T (2022) Effect of inherent microcrack populations on rock tensile fracture behaviour: numerical study based on embedded discontinuity finite elements. Acta Geotech 17(6):2079–2099

    Google Scholar 

  9. Saksala T, Ibrahimbegovic A (2020) Thermal shock weakening of granite rock under dynamic loading: 3D numerical modeling based on embedded discontinuity finite elements. Int J Numer Anal Met 44(13):1788–1811

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kuhn MR (2022) Multi-scale simulation of wave propagation and liquefaction in a one-dimensional soil column: hybrid DEM and finite-difference procedure. Acta Geotech 17(7):2611–2632

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chen SS, Wang W, Zhao XS (2019) An interpolating element-free Galerkin scaled boundary method applied to structural dynamic analysis. Appl Math Model 75:494–505

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Tian ZK, Jiao DM (2021) Discrete sizing optimization of stepped cylindrical silo using PSO method and implicit dynamic FE analysis. Eng Comput-Germany 37(2):1015–1047

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Satoh A, Takeda K, Murakami K (2019) FEM analysis on combined bond-cone fracture of a post-installed adhesive anchor filled with UHPFRC. Theor Appl Fract Mec 100:46–54

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gao GY, Yao SF, Yang J, Chen J (2019) Investigating ground vibration induced by moving train loads on unsaturated ground using 2.5D FEM. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 124:72–85

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ingrassia T, Nigrelli V, Buttitta R (2013) A comparison of simplex and simulated annealing for optimization of a new rear underrun protective device. Eng Comput-Germany 29(3):345–358

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sharma V, Fujisawa K, Murakami A (2020) Space-time FEM with block-iterative algorithm for nonlinear dynamic fracture analysis of concrete gravity dam. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 131

  17. Soares D (2008) A time-domain FEM approach based on implicit Green’s functions for the dynamic analysis of porous media. Comput Method Appl M 197(51–52):4645–4652

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Honda R, Sakai H, Sawada S (2004) Non-iterative time integration scheme for non-linear dynamic FEM analysis. Earthq Eng Struct D 33(1):111–132

    Google Scholar 

  19. Campillo M, Sedaghati R, Drew RAL, Alfonso I, Perez L (2021) Development of an RVE using a DEM-FEM scheme under modified approximate periodic boundary condition to estimate the elastic mechanical properties of open foams. Eng Comput-Germany

  20. Sharma N, Lalepalli AK, Hirwani CK, Das A, Panda SK, Topal U, Dede T (2021) Optimal deflection and stacking sequence prediction of curved composite structure using hybrid (FEM and soft computing) technique. Eng Comput-Germany 37(1):477–487

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yuan WH, Wang HC, Zhang W, Dai BB, Liu K, Wang Y (2021) Particle finite element method implementation for large deformation analysis using Abaqus. Acta Geotech 16(8):2449–2462

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhou XP, Wang LF (2021) Investigating propagation path of interface crack by the field-enriched finite element method. Appl Math Model 99:81–105

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Higdon RL (1992) Absorbing boundary-conditions for acoustic and elastic-waves in stratified media. J Comput Phys 101(2):386–418

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Wu ZJ, Fan LF (2014) The numerical manifold method for elastic wave propagation in rock with time-dependent absorbing boundary conditions. Eng Anal Bound Elem 46:41–50

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Badry RS, Ramancharla PK (2018) Local absorbing boundary conditions to simulate wave propagation in unbounded viscoelastic domains. Comput Struct 208:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wang PP, Zhang AM, Ming FR, Sun PN, Cheng H (2019) A novel non-reflecting boundary condition for fluid dynamics solved by smoothed particle hydrodynamics. J Fluid Mech 860:81–114

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Bao HR, Hatzor YH, Huang X (2012) A new viscous boundary condition in the two-dimensional discontinuous deformation analysis method for wave propagation problems. Rock Mech Rock Eng 45(5):919–928

    Google Scholar 

  28. Semblat JF, Duval AM, Dangla P (2002) Seismic site effects in a deep alluvial basin: numerical analysis by the boundary element method. Comput Geotech 29(7):573–585

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhou XT, Sheng Q, Cui Z (2019) Dynamic boundary setting for discrete element method considering the seismic problems of rock masses. Granul Matter 21 (3)

  30. Wu XJ, Li XT (2018) Stable absorbing boundary conditions for molecular dynamics in general domains. Comput Mech 62(6):1259–1272

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Basu U, Chopra AK (2003) Perfectly matched layers for time-harmonic elastodynamics of unbounded domains: theory and finite-element implementation. Comput Method Appl M 192(11–12):1337–1375

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Basu U, Chopra AK (2004) Perfectly matched layers for transient elastodynamics of unbounded domains. Int J Numer Meth Eng 59(8):1039–1074

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Abarbanel S, Qasimov H, Tsynkov S (2009) Long-time performance of unsplit pmls with explicit second order schemes. J Sci Comput 41(1):1–12

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Matzen R (2011) An efficient finite element time-domain formulation for the elastic second-order wave equation: a non-split complex frequency shifted convolutional PML. Int J Numer Meth Eng 88(10):951–973

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Poul MK, Zerva A (2018) Time-domain PML formulation for modeling viscoelastic waves with Rayleigh-type damping in an unbounded domain: theory and application in ABAQUS. Finite Elem Anal Des 152:1–16

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Baffet D, Bielak J, Givoli D, Hagstrom T, Rabinovich D (2012) Long-time stable high-order absorbing boundary conditions for elastodynamics. Comput Method Appl M 241:20–37

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Ju SH, Wang YM (2001) Time-dependent absorbing boundary conditions for elastic wave propagation. Int J Numer Meth Eng 50(9):2159–2174

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Pettit JR, Walker A, Cawley P, Lowe MJS (2014) A stiffness reduction method for efficient absorption of waves at boundaries for use in commercial finite element codes. Ultrasonics 54(7):1868–1879

    Google Scholar 

  39. Berenger JP (1994) A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic-waves. J Comput Phys 114(2):185–200

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Martin R, Komatitsch D, Gedney SD (2008) A variational formulation of a stabilized unsplit convolutional perfectly matched layer for the isotropic or anisotropic seismic wave equation. Cmes-Comp Model Eng 37(3):274–304

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. Martin R, Komatitsch D, Ezziani A (2008) An unsplit convolutional perfectly matched layer improved at grazing incidence for seismic wave propagation in poroelastic media. Geophysics 73(4):T51–T61

    Google Scholar 

  42. Becache E, Petropoulos PG, Gedney SD (2004) On the long-time behavior of unsplit perfectly matched layers. Ieee T Antenn Propag 52(5):1335–1342

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Martin R, Komatitsch D (2009) An unsplit convolutional perfectly matched layer technique improved at grazing incidence for the viscoelastic wave equation. Geophys J Int 179(1):333–344

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kumar SRS, Indimath SS, Balasubramaniam K, Balasubramanian T (2014) Split approach for FEA simulations of very large wave propagation models. Aip Conf Proc 1581:542–549

    Google Scholar 

  45. Berenger JP (2002) Numerical reflection from FDTD-PMLs: a comparison of the split PML with the unsplit and CFSPMLs. Ieee T Antenn Propag 50(3):258–265

    Google Scholar 

  46. do Nascimento VE, Borges BHV, Teixeira FL (2006) Split-field PML implementations for the unconditionally stable LOD-FDTD method. Ieee Microw Wirel Co 16 (7):398-400

  47. Rajagopal P, Drozdz M, Skelton EA, Lowe MJS, Craster RV (2012) On the use of absorbing layers to simulate the propagation of elastic waves in unbounded isotropic media using commercially available finite element packages. Ndt&E Int 51:30–40

    Google Scholar 

  48. Semblat JF, Lenti L, Gandomzadeh A (2011) A simple multi-directional absorbing layer method to simulate elastic wave propagation in unbounded domains. Int J Numer Meth Eng 85(12):1543–1563

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. Connor JJ (2003) Introduction to Structural Motion Control. Prentice Hall Pearson Education, Incorporated,

  50. Kayabekir AE, Bekdas G, Nigdeli SM, Geem ZW (2020) Optimum design of PID controlled active tuned mass damper via modified harmony search. Appl Sci-Basel 10 (8)

  51. Zhou XP, Chen JW, Berto F (2020) XFEM based node scheme for the frictional contact crack problem. Comput Struct 231

  52. Chen JW, Zhou XP, Zhou LS, Berto F (2020) Simple and effective approach to modeling crack propagation in the framework of extended finite element method. Theor Appl Fract Mec 106

  53. Chen JW, Zhou XP (2019) The enhanced extended finite element method for the propagation of complex branched cracks. Eng Anal Bound Elem 104:46–62

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  54. Chen JW, Zhou XP, Yao WW, Zi WY (2021) A novel method for accurate simulations of concentrated forces in finite element analysis. Eng Comput-Germany

  55. Liu GR, Quek SS (2003) Finite Element Method: A Practical Course. Elsevier Science,

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (No. 2021CFB088), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 52027814, 51839009 and 42202310), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2042021kf0057), and the Guizhou Provincial Science and Technology Projects (No. [2020] 2004).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Civil Engineering, Wuhan University, No.8 Donghu South Road, Wuhan, 430072, China

    Junwei Chen, Zhi Zhao & Xiaoping Zhou

  2. Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory of Rock and Soil Mechanics and Engineering Safety, Guiyang, 550025, China

    Junwei Chen

Authors
  1. Junwei Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhi Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiaoping Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoping Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial or non-financial interests that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (AVI 22529 kb)

Supplementary file2 (AVI 21956 kb)

Supplementary file3 (AVI 22215 kb)

Supplementary file4 (AVI 75930 kb)

Supplementary file5 (AVI 57102 kb)

Supplementary file6 (AVI 34295 kb)

Supplementary file7 (AVI 33563 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, J., Zhao, Z. & Zhou, X. A novel enriched degree of freedom method for absorbing boundary conditions in the time-domain finite element method. Engineering with Computers 39, 3401–3419 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-022-01757-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-022-01757-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation