We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Latin hypervolume design for irregular sampling spaces and its application in the analysis of cracks

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Given the limitations of Latin hypercube design in constrained design space, Latin hypervolume designs with good space-filling and noncollapsing properties are developed in this paper. In the proposed method, the value of the design points in each dimension is based on the hypervolume instead of the coordinate axis length, enabling the generated design to have the space-filling property. To address the challenge of precisely obtaining the hypervolume in high-dimensional and irregular design spaces, Monte Carlo sampling is introduced to approximate the hypervolume. In addition, a constrained simulated annealing algorithm is presented for the proposed method, with an acceleration module to speed up the process of searching for a feasible design. The experiments on benchmark numerical examples illustrate that the proposed method is considerably better compared with the other two methods. Moreover, the proposed method is applied to an engineering modeling scenario to analyze the impact of cracks on the physical properties of an aircraft model. The results show that the proposed method generates a more desirable distribution of cracks and is more suitable for complex situations in practical engineering. Source code is available at https://github.com/Pang-Yong/LHVD-OLHVO.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data are available from the author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Viana FAC (2016) A tutorial on Latin hypercube design of experiments. Qual Reliab Eng Int 32:1975–1985. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.1924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pang Y, Wang Y, Sun W, Song X (2022) OTL-PEM: an optimization-based two-layer pointwise ensemble of surrogate Models. J Mech Des 144:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4053011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lai X, Wang S, Guo Z, Zhang C, Sun W, Song X (2021) Designing a shape-performance integrated digital twin based on multiple models and dynamic data: a boom crane example. J Mech Des Trans ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4049861

  4. Zhai Z, Li H, Wang X (2020) An adaptive sampling method for Kriging surrogate model with multiple outputs. Eng Comput 38:277–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01145-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhou Q, Wu J, Xue T, Jin P (2021) A two-stage adaptive multi-fidelity surrogate model-assisted multi-objective genetic algorithm for computationally expensive problems. Eng Comput 37:623–639. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00844-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tenne Y (2015) Initial sampling methods in metamodel-assisted optimization. Eng Comput 31:661–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-014-0372-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stinstra E, Stehouwer P, Den Hertog D, Vestjens A (2003) Constrained maximin designs for computer experiments. Technometrics 45:340–346. https://doi.org/10.1198/004017003000000168

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. McKay MD, Beckman RJ, Conover WJ (2000) A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 42:55–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.2000.10485979

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Meng D, Li Y, He C, Guo J, Lv Z, Wu P (2021) Multidisciplinary design for structural integrity using a collaborative optimization method based on adaptive surrogate modelling. Mater Des 206:109789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tian J, Tan Y, Zeng J, Sun C, Jin Y (2019) Multiobjective infill criterion driven Gaussian process-assisted particle swarm optimization of high-dimensional expensive problems. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 23:459–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Trinh MC, Jun H (2021) Stochastic bending and buckling analysis of laminated composite plates using Latin hypercube sampling. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-021-01544-y

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Lekivetz R, Jones B (2015) Fast flexible space-filling designs for nonrectangular regions. Qual Reliab Eng Int 31:829–837. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.1640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Aziz A (2019) EC-030 statistical analysis of various optimal latin hypercube designs, pp 187–190

  14. Borkowski JJ, Piepel GF (2009) Uniform designs for highly constrained mixture experiments. J Qual Technol 41:35–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.2009.11917758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Van Dam ER, Husslage B, Den Hertog D, Melissen H (2007) Maximin Latin hypercube designs in two dimensions. Oper Res 55:158–169. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1060.0317

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Morris MD, Mitchell TJ (1995) Exploratory designs for computational experiments. J Stat Plan Inference 43:381–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3758(94)00035-T

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhu H, Liu L, Long T, Peng L (2012) A novel algorithm of maximin Latin hypercube design using successive local enumeration. Eng Optim 44:551–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2011.591790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bates SJ, Sienz J, Toropov VV (2004) Formulation of the optimal Latin hypercube design of experiments using a permutation genetic algorithm. Collect. Tech Pap. AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Struct. Struct. Dyn. Mater. Conf. 7:5217–5223. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2004-2011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Aziz M, Tayarani MHN (2014) An adaptive memetic Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm for finding large-scale Latin hypercube designs. Eng Appl Artif Intell 36:222–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2014.07.021

  20. Fang K-T, Ma C-X, Winker P (2000) Centered $L_2$-discrepancy of random sampling and Latin hypercube design, and construction of uniform designs. Math Comput 71:275–297. https://doi.org/10.1090/s0025-5718-00-01281-3

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Pholdee N, Bureerat S (2015) An efficient optimum Latin hypercube sampling technique based on sequencing optimisation using simulated annealing. Int J Syst Sci 46:1780–1789. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207721.2013.835003

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Ye KQ, Li W, Sudjianto A (2000) Algorithmic construction of optimal symmetric Latin hypercube designs. J Stat Plan Inference 90:145–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-3758(00)00105-1

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Liefvendahl M, Stocki R (2006) A study on algorithms for optimization of Latin hypercubes. J Stat Plan Inference 136:3231–3247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2005.01.007

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Shang X, Chao T, Ma P, Yang M (2020) An efficient local search-based genetic algorithm for constructing optimal Latin hypercube design. Eng Optim 52:271–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2019.1584618

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen RB, Hsieh DN, Hung Y, Wang W (2013) Optimizing Latin hypercube designs by particle swarm. Stat Comput 23:663–676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-012-9363-3

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Jin R, Chen W, Sudjianto A (2005) An efficient algorithm for constructing optimal design of computer experiments. J Stat Plan Inference 134:268–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2004.02.014

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Li W, Lu L, Xie X, Yang M (2017) A novel extension algorithm for optimized Latin hypercube sampling. J Stat Comput Simul 87:2549–2559. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2017.1340475

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Viana FAC, Venter G, Balabanov V (2012) An algorithm for fast optimal Latin hypercube design of experiments. Int J Numer Methods Eng. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Pan G, Ye P, Wang P (2014) A novel latin hypercube algorithm via translational propagation. Sci World J. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/163949

  30. Garud SS, Karimi IA, Kraft M (2017) Design of computer experiments: a review. Comput Chem Eng 106:71–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2017.05.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang Y, Xu B, Sun G, Yang S (2017) A two-phase differential evolution for uniform designs in constrained experimental domains. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 21:665–680. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2017.2669098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mak S, Joseph VR (2018) Minimax and minimax projection designs using clustering. J Comput Graph Stat 27:166–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.2017.1302881

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Petelet M, Iooss B, Asserin O, Loredo A (2010) Latin hypercube sampling with inequality constraints. AStA Adv Stat Anal 94:325–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10182-010-0144-z

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Draguljié D, Dean AM, Santner TJ (2012) Noncollapsing space-filling designs for bounded nonrectangular regions. Technometrics 54:169–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.2012.676951

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Fuerle F, Sienz J (2011) Formulation of the audze-eglais uniform Latin hypercube design of experiments for constrained design spaces. Adv Eng Softw 42:680–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2011.05.004

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Fuerle F, Sienz J (2013) Decomposed surrogate based optimization of carbon-fiber bicycle frames using Optimum Latin Hypercubes for constrained design spaces. Comput Struct 119:48–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.11.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wu Z, Wang D, Wang W, Zhao K, Okolo PN, Zhang W (2019) Space-filling experimental designs for constrained design spaces. Eng Optim 51:1495–1508. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2018.1542691

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen RB, Li CH, Hung Y, Wang W (2019) Optimal noncollapsing space-filling designs for irregular experimental regions. J Comput Graph Stat 28:74–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.2018.1482760

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Gendreau M, Potvin J-Y (2010) Handbook of metaheuristics: international series in operations research e management science

  40. Suganthan PN, Hansen N, Liang JJ, Deb K, Chen YP, Auger A, Tiwari S (2005) Problem definitions and evaluation criteria for the CEC 2006 special session on constrained real-parameter optimization, Tech. Report, Nanyang Technol. Univ. Singapore, May 2005 KanGAL Rep. 2005005, IIT Kanpur, India, pp 1–24

  41. Yang L, Lai X, He X, Li P, Sun W, Song X A Newton-Cotes-based online acceleration signal fast processing approach to obtain displacement for digital twin (in press)

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2018YFB1702502) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52075068).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mechanical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, 116024, China

    Yong Pang, Liangliang Yang, Yitang Wang, Xiaonan Lai, Wei Sun & Xueguan Song

Authors
  1. Yong Pang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Liangliang Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yitang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiaonan Lai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Wei Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xueguan Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xueguan Song.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pang, Y., Yang, L., Wang, Y. et al. A Latin hypervolume design for irregular sampling spaces and its application in the analysis of cracks. Engineering with Computers 39, 3509–3526 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-022-01769-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-022-01769-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation