Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

A PDROD model of reinforced concrete based on peridynamics and rod elements

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The difficulties in dealing with steel skeleton frames and low computational efficiency are the major obstacles for applying peridynamics (PD) to model reinforced concrete (RC) structures. This paper proposes a new reinforced concrete model, named PDROD, in which the concrete is modeled by PD theory and the reinforcement is modeled by rod elements. A bonding formulation is derived to characterize the interaction between the concrete and reinforcements, guaranteeing the consistence of load transfer between the two mediums. Thanks to the new bonding model, the discretization of the concrete and reinforcements does not necessarily need to be coincident, facilitating the application of PDROD in modeling RC structures whose skeleton frames are with complex geometries. The PDROD model not only gives full play to the advantages of PD theory in damage problems without additional failure criteria and stiffness degradation model, but also significantly increases the numerical efficiency of computation, which extends the applicability of PD to modeling real-scale RC structures. The accuracy and efficiency of the PDROD model are demonstrated by simulating a series of examples of concrete plates with reinforcing bars. Good agreements have been observed between the results from PDROD and the classical FEM predictions. The challenging benchmarks on the Stuttgart Shear Tests were also simulated to demonstrate the capability of the PDROD model in quasi-brittle fracture problems of large-scale RC structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31
Fig. 32

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wu J-Y (2018) A geometrically regularized gradient-damage model with energetic equivalence. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg 328:612–637

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Kuhl E, Ramm E, de Borst R (2000) An anisotropic gradient damage model for quasi-brittle materials. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg 183(1–2):87–103

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bažant ZP, Oh BH (1983) Crack band theory for fracture of concrete. Mat Constr 16(3):155–177

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wu J-Y, Li F-B (2015) An improved stable XFEM (Is-XFEM) with a novel enrichment function for the computational modeling of cohesive cracks. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 295:77–107

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Song J-H, Areias P, Belytschko T (2006) A method for dynamic crack and shear band propagation with phantom nodes. Int J Numer Methods Eng 67:868–893

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Chau-Dinh T, Zi G, Lee P-S, Rabczuk T, Song J-H (2012) Phantom-node method for shell models with arbitrary cracks. Comput Struct 9293:242–246

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wang Y, Waisman H, Harari I (2017) Direct evaluation of stress intensity factors for curved cracks using Irwin’s integral and XFEM with high-order enrichment functions. Int J Numer Methods Eng 112(7):629–654

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Geers M, Borst RD, Peerlings R (2000) Damage and crack modeling in single-edge and double-edge notched concrete beams. Eng Fract Mech 65:247–261

    Google Scholar 

  9. Saloustros S, Pel L, Cervera M, Roca P (2017) Finite element modelling of internal and multiple localized cracks. Comput Mech 59:299–316

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhou S, Rabczuk T, Zhuang X (2018) Phase field modeling of quasi-static and dynamic crack propagation: comsol implementation and case studies. Adv Eng Software 122:31–49

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang Y, Zhuang X (2019) Cracking elements method for dynamic brittle fracture. Theor Appl Fract Mec 102:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang Y, Mang HA (2020) Global cracking elements: a novel tool for Galerkin-based approaches simulating quasi-brittle fracture. Int J Numer Methods Eng 121:2462–2480

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang Y, Lackner R, Zeiml M, Mang HA (2015) Strong discontinuity embedded approach with standard SOS formulation: element formulation, energy-based crack-tracking strategy, and validations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg 287:335–366

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang Y, Huang J, Yuan Y, Mang HA (2021) Cracking elements method with a dissipation-based arc-length approach. Finite Elem Anal Des 195:103573

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Rabczuk T, Zi G, Bordas S, Nguyen-Xuan H (2010) A simple and robust three-dimensional cracking-particle method without enrichment. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg 199:2437–2455

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Fédération Internationale du Béton (fib) (2008) Practitioners’ guide to fnite element modelling of reinforced concrete structures

  17. Silling SA (2000) Reformulation of elasticity theory for discontinuities and long-range forces. J Mech Phys Solids 48(1):175–209

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Silling SA, Lehoucq RB (2010) Peridynamic theory of solid mechanics. Adv Appl Mech 44:73–168

    Google Scholar 

  19. Silling SA, Askari E (2005) A meshfree method based on the peridynamic model of solid mechanics. Comput Struct 3:1526–1535

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hu W, Wang Y, Yu J et al (2013) Impact damage on a thin glass plate with a thin polycarbonate backing. Int J Impact Eng 62:152–165

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ha YD, Bobaru F (2010) Studies of dynamic crack propagation and crack branching with peridynamics. Int J Fracture 162(1):229–244

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Madenci E, Oterkus E (2014) Peridynamic Theory and Its Applications. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Bobaru F et al (2016) Handbook of peridynamic modeling. Crc Press

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang D, Dong W, Liu X et al (2018) Investigation on mode-I crack propagation in concrete using bond-based peridynamics with a new damage model. Eng Fract Mech 199:567–581

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang N, Gu Q, Huang S et al (2021) A practical bond-based peridynamic modeling of reinforced concrete structures. Eng Struct 244:112748

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gu X, Zhang Q (2020) A modified conjugated bond-based peridynamic analysis for impact failure of concrete gravity dam. Meccanica 55:547–566

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen W, Gu X, Zhang Q, Xia X (2021) A refined thermo-mechanical fully coupled peridynamics with application to concrete cracking. Eng Fract Mech 242:107463

    Google Scholar 

  28. Li W, Guo L (2019) Dual-horizon peridynamics analysis of debonding failure in FRP-to-concrete bonded joints. Int J Concr Struct Mater 13(1):26

    Google Scholar 

  29. Huang D, Zhang Q, Qiao P (2011) Damage and progressive failure of concrete structures using non-local peridynamic modeling. Sci China Techn Sci 54(003):591–596

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wu L, Huang D, Xu Y, Wang L (2019) A non-ordinary state-based peridynamic formulation for failure of concrete subjected to impacting loads. Comput Model Eng Sci 118(3):561–581

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lu J, Zhang Y, Muhammad H, Chen Z et al (2019) 3D analysis of anchor bolt pullout in concrete materials using the non-ordinary state-based peridynamics. Eng Fract Mech 207:68–85

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lu J, Zhang Y, Muhammad H et al (2018) Peridynamic model for the numerical simulation of anchor bolt pullout in concrete. Math Probl Eng 3:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  33. Huang X, Kong X, Chen Z, Fang Q (2021) Peridynamics modelling of dynamic tensile failure in concrete. Int J Impact Eng 155:103918

    Google Scholar 

  34. Shi C, Shi Q, Tong Q, Li S (2021) Peridynamics modeling and simulation of meso-scale fracture in recycled coarse aggregate (RCA) concretes. Theor Appl Fract Mec 114:102949

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jin Y, Li L, Jia Y et al (2021) Numerical study of shrinkage and heating induced cracking in concrete materials and influence of inclusion stiffness with Peridynamics method. Comput Geotech 133:103998

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zhao J, Chen Z, Mehrmashhadi J, Bobaru F (2020) A stochastic multiscale peridynamic model for corrosion-induced fracture in reinforced concrete. Eng Fract Mech 229:106969

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wu P, Zhao J, Chen Z, Bobaru F (2020) Validation of a stochastically homogenized peridynamic model for quasi-static fracture in concrete. Eng Fract Mech 237:107293

    Google Scholar 

  38. Zhao J, Jafarzadeh S, Rahmani M et al (2021) A peridynamic model for galvanic corrosion and fracture. Electrochim Acta 391:138968

    Google Scholar 

  39. Gerstle W, Sau N, Silling S (2007) Peridynamic modeling of concrete structures. Nucl Eng Des 237:1250–1258

    Google Scholar 

  40. Gerstle W, Sakhavand N, Chapman S (2010) Peridynamic and continuum models of reinforced concrete lap splice compared, in: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Fracture Mechanics of Concrete and Concrete Structures, FraMCoS-7, Jeju, South Korea, ISBN 978-89-5708-180-8.

  41. Chen X, Yong Y, Zhang Y, Yuan X (2021) Peridynamic modeling of prefabricated beams post-cast with steelfiber reinforced high-strength concrete. Struct Concr 22:445–456.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Xia Y, Fan C, Shen F, Qian W (2021) Peridynamic simulation of failure process of reinforced concrete structures. Chin J Appl Mech 38(1):143–149

    Google Scholar 

  43. Sau N, Mendoza JM, Almada AB (2019) Peridynamic modelling of reinforced concrete structures. Eng Fail Anal 103:266–274

    Google Scholar 

  44. Yaghoobi A, Chorzepa MG (2017) Fracture analysis of fiber reinforced concrete structures in the micropolar peridynamic analysis framework. Eng Fract Mech 169:238–250

    Google Scholar 

  45. Shi H, Qian S, Xu T et al (2016) Study on reinforced concrete structure failure based on peridynamic theories. Guizhou Science 34(6):64–68

    Google Scholar 

  46. Hattori G, Hobbs M, Orr J (2021) A review on the developments of peridynamics for reinforced concrete structures. Arch Comput Method Eng 28:4655–4686

    Google Scholar 

  47. Macek RW, Silling SA (2007) Peridynamics via finite element analysis. Finite Elem Anal Des 43(15):1169–1178

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  48. Kilic B, Madenci E (2010) An adaptive dynamic relaxation method for quasi-static simulations using the peridynamic theory. Theor Appl Fract Mec 53(3):194–204

    Google Scholar 

  49. Leonhardt F, Walther R (1964) The Stuttgart Shear Tests, 1961: Contributions to the treatment of the problems of shear in reinforced concrete construction. A translation of articles that appeared in Beton- und Stahlbetonbau. 56 (12) (1961) and 57 (2, 3, 6, 7, 8) (1962), Cement and Concrete Association, London

  50. Hobbs M, Hattori G, Orr J (2022) Predicting shear failure in reinforced concrete members using a three-dimensional peridynamic framework. Comput Struct 258:106682

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Astronautic Science and Mechanics, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, People’s Republic of China

    Xiongwu Yang, Fengshou Li, Weicheng Gao & Wei Liu

  2. Mechanics of Composites for Energy and Mobility Lab, Mechanical Engineering Program, Physical Science and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

    Xiaole Li

Authors
  1. Xiongwu Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fengshou Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Weicheng Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wei Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiaole Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weicheng Gao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, X., Li, F., Gao, W. et al. A PDROD model of reinforced concrete based on peridynamics and rod elements. Engineering with Computers 39, 3629–3650 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-022-01774-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-022-01774-8

Keywords