Abstract
Victoir (2004) developes a powerful method for constructing high-dimensional cubature formulas with small number of points, which consists of the corner-vector approach for the hyperoctahedral group \(B_d\) and the thinning approach based on orthogonal arrays and combinatorial designs. Hirao et al. (2014) applies this to constructions of optimal rotatable designs on the d-dimensional unit ball \({\varvec{B}}^d\) and thereby finds some infinite series of third-order designs with small number of points. Afterwards, Sawa and Hirao (2017) discusses the corner-vector approach for group \(D_d\) that can be realized as the symmetry group of a demihypercube in \({\mathbb {R}}^d\). In the present paper we discuss a further generalization and improvement of these works, and describe many examples and infinite series of D-optimal rotatable designs with small number of points. The core and novelty in the presentation lies in the focus on the cubature theory in numerical analysis or Euclidean design theory in combinatorics, which not only improves and/or generalizes previous works in those fields of mathematics but also provides a unified mathematical description of various classes of factorial designs, including Box–Hunter solid designs, Box–Behnken designs, central composite designs and Plackett–Burman designs, in the modern framework of the cubature theory. Our new framework enables one, for example, to briefly evaluate the maximum integer t for which such classical factorial designs are of t-th order rotatable.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aoki, S., Hibi, T., Ohsugi, H.: Markov-chain Monte Carlo Methods for the Box-Behnken Designs and Centrally Symmetric Configurations. J. Stat. Theory Pract. 10, 59–72 (2016)
Bajnok, B.: Orbits of the hyperoctahedral group as Euclidean designs. J. Algebr. Combin. 25, 375–397 (2007)
Ballinger, B., Blekherman, G., Cohn, H., Giansiracusa, N., Kelly, E., Schürmann, A.: Experimental study of energy-minimizing point configurations on spheres. Exp. Math. 18, 257–283 (2009)
Bannai, E.: On antipodal Euclidean tight \((2e + 1)\)-designs. J. Algebr. Combin. 24, 391–414 (2006)
Bannai, E., Bannai, E.: On optimal tight \(4\)-designs on \(2\) concentric spheres. Euro. J. Combin. 27, 179–192 (2006)
Bannai, E., Bannai, E.: Spherical designs and Euclidean designs. In: Recent Developments in Algebra and Related Areas (Beijing, 2007), Adv. Lect. Math., vol. 8, pp. 1–37. Higher Education Press, Beijing; International Press (2009)
Bannai, E., Bannai, E.: A survey on spherical designs and algebraic combinatorics on spheres. Eur. J. Comb. 30(6), 1392–1425 (2009)
Bilyk, D., Glazyrin, A., Matzke, R., Park, J., Vlasiuk, O.: Optimal measures for p-frame energies on spheres. arXiv:1908.00885
Bourbaki, N.: Lie groups and Lie algebras. Chapters 4–6, Elements of Mathematics (Berlin), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, (2002)
Box, G.F.P., Behnken, D.W.: Some new three level designs for the study of quantitative variables. Technometrics 2, 455–475 (1960)
Box, G.E.P., Hunter, J.S.: Multi-factor experimental designs for exploring response surfaces. Ann. Math. Statist. 28, 195–241 (1957)
Box, G.E.P., Hunter, J.S., Hunter, W.G.: Statistics for Experimenters: Design, Innovation, and Discovery (2nd ed.), Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, (2005)
Dao, T., de Sa, C., Ré, C.: Gaussian quadrature for kernel features. In: Adv Neural Inform Process Syst (NIPS 2017)
Das, M.N., Narasimham, V.L.: Construction of rotatable designs through balanced incomplete block designs. Ann. Math. Statist., Vol. 33, 1421–1439
Delsarte, P.: An algebraic approach to the association schemes of coding theory. Philips Res. Rep. Suppl. 10, (1973)
Draper, N.R., Pukelsheim, F.: On third order rotatability. Metrika 41, 137–161 (1994)
Enomoto, H., Ito, N., Noda, R.: Tight \(4\)-designs. Osaka J. Math. 16, 39–43 (1979)
Erdélyi, A., Magnus, W., Oberhettinger, F., Tricomi, F.: Higher Transcendental Functions. II (Bateman Manuscript Project). MacGraw-Hill, New York-Toronto-London, (1953)
Farrell, R.H., Kiefer, J., Walbran, A.: Optimum multivariate designs. In: Proceedings of the Berkeley Symposium. Vol. 1, pp. 113–138 (1967)
Gaffke, N., Heiligers, B.: Algorithms for optimal design with application to multiple polynomial regression. Metrika 42, 173–190 (1995)
Gaffke, N., Heiligers, B.: Minimum support invariant designs for multiple cubic regression. J. Statist. Plann. Inf. 72, 229–245 (1998)
Gupta, S., Jones, B.: Equireplicate balanced block designs with unequal block sizes. Biometrika 70, 433–440 (1983)
Hedayat, A.S., Sloane, N.J.A., Stufken, J.: Orthogonal arrays. Springer Series in Statistics, Springer-Verlag, New York, (1999)
Hirao, M., Sawa, M.: On minimal cubature formulae of small degree for spherically symmetric integrals. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 47, 3195–3211 (2009)
Hirao, M., Sawa, M.: Geometric designs and rotatable designs II. In preparation
Hirao, M., Sawa, M.: On almost tight Euclidean designs for rotationally symmetric integrals. Jpn. J. Stat. Data Sci. 2(2), 615–639 (2019)
Hirao, M., Sawa, M., Jimbo, M.: Constructions of \(\Phi _p\)-optimal rotatable designs on the ball. Sankhya Ser. A 77, 211–236 (2014)
Huda, S.: Rotatable Designs: Constructions and Considerations in the Robust Design of Experiments. University of London, Imperial College (1981). Ph. D. thesis
Humphreys, J.E.: Reflection Groups and Coxeter Groups. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992)
Ionin, Y.J., Trung, T.: Symmetric designs. In: Colbourn, C.J., Dinitz, J.H. (eds.) Handbook of Combinatorial Designs, 2nd edn, pp. 110–124. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2007)
Jimbo, M., Shiromoto, K.: A construction of mutually disjoint Steiner systems from isomorphic Golay codes. J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 116, 1245–1251 (2009)
Kageyama, S.: A property of \(t\)-wise balanced designs. Ars Combin. 31, 237–238 (1991)
Karlin, S.J., Studden, W.: Tchebycheff systems: With applications in analysis and statistics. Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol. XV. Interscience Publishers John Wiley and Sons, New York-London-Sydney, (1966)
Khosrovshahi, G.B., Laue, R.: \(t\)-Designs with \(t \ge 3\). In: Handbook of Combinatorial Designs (2nd ed.), pp. 79–101. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA, (2007)
Kiefer, J.: Optimum experimental designs, V, with applications to systematic and rotatable designs. Proc. Berkeley Symp. 1, 381–405 (1960)
Kôno, K.: Optimum design for quadratic regression on the \(k\)-cube. Mem. Fac. Kyushu Univ. Ser. A 16, 114–122 (1962)
Kuperberg, G.: Numerical cubature using error-correcting codes. Siam J. Numer. Anal. 44, 897–907 (2006)
Lyubich, Y.I., Vaserstein, L.N.: Isometric embeddings between classical Banach spaces, cubature formulas, and spherical designs. Geom. Dedicata 47, 327–362 (1993)
van Lint, J.H., Wilson, R.M.: A Course in Combinatorics, 2nd edn. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (2001)
Mukarjee, R.: On fourth order rotatable designs. Commun. Statist. Theory Method. 18, 1698–1702 (1987)
Neumaier, A., Seidel, J.J.: Discrete measures for spherical designs, eutactic stars and lattices. Nederl. Akad. Wetensch. Indag. Math. 50, 321–334 (1988)
Neumaier, A., Seidel, J.J.: Measures of strength \(2e\) and optimal designs of degree \(e\). Sankhya Ser. A 54, 299–309 (1992)
Njui, F., Patel, M.S.: Fifth order rotatability. Commun. Statist. Theory Method. 17, 833–848 (1988)
Noskov, M.V., Schmid, H.J.: On the number of nodes in \(n\)-dimensional cubature formulae of degree \(5\) for integrals over the ball. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 169, 247–254 (2004)
Nozaki, H., Sawa, M.: Note on cubature formulae and designs obtained from group orbits. Canad. J. Math. 64, 1359–1377 (2012)
Nozaki, H., Sawa, M.: Remarks on Hilbert identities, isometric embeddings, and invariant cubature. St. Petersburg Math. J. 25, 615–646 (2014)
Pesotchinsky, I.: \(\Phi _p\)-optimal second-order designs for symmetric regions. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 2, 173–188 (1978)
Plackett, R.L., Burman, J.P.: The design of optimum multifactorial experiments. Biometrika 33, 305–325 (1946)
Pukelsheim, F.: Optimal Design of Experiments. SIAM, Philadelphia (2006)
Sawa, M., Hirao, M.: Characterizing \(D\)-optimal rotatable designs with finite reflection groups. Sankhya Series A, Vol. 79, 101–132 (2017)
Sawa, M., Hirao, M., Kageyama, S.: Euclidean design theory. Springer, (2019)
Sawa, M., Xu, Y.: On positive cubature rules on the simplex and isometric embeddings. Math. Comp. 83, 1251–1277 (2013)
Shatalov, O.: Isometric embeddings \(l_2^m \rightarrow l_p^n\) and cubature formulas over classical fields. Ph.D. thesis, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel (2001)
Silvey, S.D.: Optimal Design. Monographs on Applied Probability and Statistics. Chapman & Hall, London-New York (1980)
Sobolev, S.L.: Cubature formulas on the sphere which are invariant under transformations of finite rotation groups. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 146, 310–313 (1962)
Stroud, A.H.: Approximate calculation of multiple integrals. Prentice-Hall Inc, Englewood Cliffs (1971)
Tchakaloff, V.: Formules de cubatures mécaniques à coefficients non négatifs. Bull. Sci. Math. (2) 81, 1957, 123–134
Victoir, N.: Asymmetric Cubature Formulae with Few Points in High Dimension for Symmetric Measures. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 42, 209–227 (2004)
Yamamoto, H., Hirao, M., Sawa, M.: A construction of the fourth order rotatable designs invariant under the hyperoctahedral group. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 200, 63–73 (2019)
Acknowledgements
M. Sawa is supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) 18K03414 and Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) 18H01133 of JSPS. M. Hirao is supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) 20K03736 of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
A. Optimal Values
This paper deals with D-optimal designs for the standard e-th polynomial regression model
where each \(f_{\varvec{\alpha }}\) is taken to be monomial \(\varvec{\omega }^{\varvec{\alpha }}\), \(\theta _{\alpha }\) are unknown parameters, and \(\epsilon \) is a random variable.
Given a (possibly infinite) design \(\xi \),
is the information matrix for model (8).
Let \(X = \{ {\varvec{x}}_1, \ldots , {\varvec{x}}_n \}\) be observation points and \(\xi := \xi _X = \frac{1}{n} \sum _{i} \delta _{{\varvec{x}}_i}\) be the corresponding design, where \(\delta _{{\varvec{x}}}\) is the Dirac measure at point \({\varvec{x}}\). Assume that \(\epsilon \) has a normal distribution with mean 0, variance \(\sigma ^ 2 > 0\) and \(E[\epsilon (\varvec{\omega }) \epsilon (\varvec{\omega }')] = \sigma ^2 \delta _{\varvec{\omega }, \varvec{\omega }'}\) for all \(\varvec{\omega }, \varvec{\omega }' \in {\mathbf {B}}^d\). Let \({\hat{\varvec{\theta }}}\) be the least squares estimator of \(\varvec{\theta }= (\theta _{\varvec{\alpha }})_{\varvec{\alpha }}\) in model (8). A confidence ellipsoid of \({\hat{\varvec{\theta }}}\) is then given as
see, e.g., [54]. We note that, the volume of \({\mathcal {X}}\) is proportional to \((\det \mathbb {M}(\xi ))^{-1/2}\). Thus D-optimality, which seeks \(\xi \) maximizing \(\det \mathbb {M}(\xi )\), is a popular and natural optimality criterion.
Since D-optimal weights and radii are determined without depending on the model; see Proposition 3.3 in [51], we treat the Zernike-type polynomial regression model (see [5, 42, 50]). We take \(\{ f_{\alpha } \}_{\alpha }\) to be
where \(h_l^d := \dim \mathop {\mathrm {Harm}}\nolimits _{l}({\mathbb {R}}^d) = \left( {\begin{array}{c}d + l - 1\\ l\end{array}}\right) - \left( {\begin{array}{c}d + l - 3\\ l -2\end{array}}\right) \) and \(\phi _{l,i}\) is an i-th spherical harmonics of degree l.
A merit of Zernike-type polynomial regression model is to simplify calculations of \(\det \mathbb {M}(\xi )\). For example when \(e = 3\), the information matrix of \(\xi \) is represented by
where
In order to obtain the optimal values of \(r_2\) and \(W_2\), it suffices to solve the following equations:
Solving them numerically, the following optimal values are obtainable, e.g.,
-
\(d = 2^6\), \(W_2 = 0.00143065\), \(r_2^2 = 0.363407\);
-
\(d = 2^8\), \(W_2 = 0.0000944923\), \(r_2^2 = 0.365397\);
-
\(d = 2^{10}\), \(W_2 = 5.98901 \times 10^{-6}\), \(r_2^2 = 0.36587\).
Moreover, when \(e = 2\), by the same procedure, the optimal values \(W_i\) can be more easily computed as follows:
Similarly for e in general, we can numerically compute the optimal weights \(W_i\) and radii \(r_i\) of a D-optima rotatable design of degree e on \({\varvec{B}}^d\). We omit the detail here, see, e.g., Sect. 3.3 in Sawa et al. [51].
B. Examples of Weighted Spherical Designs
We give two lists of \(B_d\)- and \(D_d\)-invariant weighted spherical 9- and 11-designs on \(\mathbb {S}^{d-1}\) generated from the corner vector method. Since a huge number of examples are constructed, we only consider the situation where \(a > 1\) with \(a^2 \in \{ 2, \ldots , 8 \}\), \(3 \le d \le 12\) and the number of orbits is at most 6, and only describe the smallest number of points in each dimension.
C. Invariant Harmonic Polynomials
In this section we describe informations of \(D_d\)-invariant harmonic polynomials that are used to construct (optimal) rotatable designs in Sects. 3, 4 and 5 .
1.1 C. 1 Group \(B_d\)
Harmonic Molien-Poincaré series
The harmonic Molien-Poincaré series is given by
Dimensions of \(B_d\)-invariant harmonic polynomial spaces
By the above harmonic Molien–Poincaré series, dimensions of \(B_d\)-invariant harmonic polynomial spaces are given by
Basis of \(B_d\)-invariant harmonic polynomial spaces By the direct calculations, it is easy to find a basis of \(B_d\)-invariant harmonic polynomial spaces \(\mathop {\mathrm {Harm}}\nolimits _{\ell } ({\mathbb {R}}^d)^{B_d}\).
-
The space \(\mathop {\mathrm {Harm}}\nolimits _{4}({\mathbb {R}}^d)^{B_d}\) is spanned by polynomial \(f_{4}\) defined as
$$\begin{aligned} f_{4} = \text {sym}(x_{1}^{4}) - \frac{6}{d-1} \text {sym}(x_{1}^{2} x_{2}^2), \quad d \ge 3. \end{aligned}$$ -
The space \(\mathop {\mathrm {Harm}}\nolimits _{6}({\mathbb {R}}^d)^{B_d}\) is spanned by polynomial \(f_{6}\) defined as
$$\begin{aligned} f_{6} = \text {sym}(x_{1}^{6}) - \frac{15}{d-1} \text {sym}(x_{1}^{2} x_{2}^4) + \frac{180}{(d-1)(d-2)} \text {sym}(x_{1}^{2} x_{2}^{2} x_{3}^{2}), \quad d \ge 3. \end{aligned}$$ -
The space \(\mathop {\mathrm {Harm}}\nolimits _{8}({\mathbb {R}}^d)^{B_d}\) is spanned by polynomials \(f_{8, 1}\) and \(f_{8, 2}\) defined as
$$\begin{aligned} f_{8,1}&= \text {sym}(x_{1}^{8}) - \frac{28}{d-1} \text {sym}(x_{1}^{2} x_{2}^{6}) + \frac{70}{d-1} \text {sym}(x_{1}^{4} x_{2}^{4}), \quad d \ge 3, \\ f_{8,2}&= \text {sym}(x_{1}^{4} x_{2}^{4}) - \frac{6}{d-2} \text {sym}(x_{1}^{2} x_{2}^{2} x_{3}^{4}) + \frac{108}{(d-2)(d-3)} \text {sym}(x_{1}^{2} x_{2}^{2}x_{3}^{2}x_{4}^{2}), \quad d \ge 4. \end{aligned}$$ -
The space \(\mathop {\mathrm {Harm}}\nolimits _{10}({\mathbb {R}}^d)^{B_d}\) is spanned by polynomials \(f_{10, 1}\) and \(f_{10, 2}\) defined as
$$\begin{aligned} f_{10,1}&= \text {sym}(x_{1}^{10}) - \frac{45}{d-1} \text {sym}(x_{1}^{2} x_{2}^{8}) + \frac{42}{d-1} \text {sym}(x_{1}^{4} x_{2}^{6}) \\&\quad + \frac{1008}{(d-1)(d-2)} \text {sym}(x_{1}^{2} x_{2}^{2} x_{3}^{6}) \\&\quad - \frac{1260}{(d-1)(d-2)} \text {sym}(x_{1}^{2} x_{2}^{4} x_{3}^{4}),\quad d \ge 3, \\ f_{10,2}&= \text {sym}(x_{1}^{4} x_{2}^{6}) - \frac{6}{d-2} \text {sym}(x_{1}^{2} x_{2}^{2} x_{3}^{6}) - \frac{30}{d-2} \text {sym}(x_{1}^{2} x_{2}^{4} x_{3}^{4}) \\&\quad + \frac{450}{(d-2)(d-3)} \text {sym}(x_{1}^{2}x_{2}^{2}x_{3}^{2}x_{4}^{4}) \\&\quad - \frac{10800}{(d-2)(d-3)(d-4)} \text {sym}(x_{1}^{2} x_{2}^{2} x_{3}^{2} x_{4}^{2} x_{5}^{2}), \quad d \ge 5. \end{aligned}$$
Substituting \({\tilde{{\varvec{v}}}}_k\) and \({\tilde{{\varvec{v}}}}_{k, a}\) for \(B_d\)-invariant harmonic polynomials
-
For \(d \ge 3\)
$$\begin{aligned} f_{4}({\tilde{{\varvec{v}}}}_k)&= \frac{1}{k}\left( 1-\frac{3(k-1)}{d-1} \right) , \\ f_{4}({\tilde{{\varvec{v}}}}_{k, a})&= \frac{1}{(a^{2}+k)^{2}} \left( a^{4}+k - \frac{6}{d-1} \Bigl (a^{2}k + \frac{k(k-1)}{2} \Bigr )\right) . \end{aligned}$$ -
For \(d \ge 3\)
$$\begin{aligned} f_{6}({\tilde{{\varvec{v}}}}_k)&= \frac{1}{k^{2}} \left( 1-\frac{15(k-1)}{d-1} + \frac{30(k-1)(k-2)}{(d-1)(d-2)}\right) , \\ f_{6}({\tilde{{\varvec{v}}}}_{k,a})&= \frac{1}{(a^{2}+k)^{3}} \biggl ( a^{6}+k- \frac{15}{d-1} \left( a^{2}k + a^{4}k + k(k-1) \right) \\&\quad + \frac{180}{(d-1)(d-2)} \Bigl ( \frac{a^{2} k (k-1)}{2} + \frac{k(k-1)(k-2)}{3!} \Bigr )\biggr ). \end{aligned}$$ -
For \(d \ge 3\)
$$\begin{aligned} f_{8,1}({\tilde{{\varvec{v}}}}_k)&= \frac{1}{k^{3}} \left( 1+\frac{7(k-1)}{d-1} \right) , \\ f_{8,1}({\tilde{{\varvec{v}}}}_{k,a})&= \frac{1}{(a^{2}+k)^{4}} \biggl ( a^{8}+k- \frac{28}{n-1} \bigl (a^{2}k + a^{6}k +k(k-1) \bigr ) \\&\quad + \frac{70}{d-1} \Bigl ( a^{4}k + \frac{k(k-1)}{2}\Bigr )\biggr ). \end{aligned}$$For \(d \ge 4\)
$$\begin{aligned} f_{8,2}({\tilde{{\varvec{v}}}}_k)&= \frac{k-1}{2k^{3}} \left( 1-\frac{6(k-2)}{d-2} + \frac{9(k-2)(k-3)}{(d-2)(d-3)} \right) , \\ f_{8,2}({\tilde{{\varvec{v}}}}_{k,a})&= \frac{1}{(a^{2}+k)^{4}} \biggl ( a^{4}+ \frac{k(k-1)}{2} - \frac{6}{d-2} \Bigl (a^{2}k(k-1) \\&\quad + \frac{a^{4}k(k-1)}{2} + \frac{k(k-1)(k-2)}{2} \Bigr ) \\&\quad + \frac{9k(4a^{2} + k-3)(k-1)(k-2)}{2(d-2)(d-3)}\biggr ). \end{aligned}$$ -
For \(d \ge 3\)
$$\begin{aligned} f_{10,1}({\tilde{{\varvec{v}}}}_k)&= \frac{1}{k^{4}} \left( 1- \frac{3(k-1)}{d-1} - \frac{126(k-1)(k-2)}{(d-1)(d-2)}\right) , \\ f_{10,1}({\tilde{{\varvec{v}}}}_{k,a})&= \frac{1}{(a^{2}+k)^{5}} \biggl ( a^{10}+k - \frac{3k(15a^{8} -14a^{6} -14a^{4} +15a^{2} +k-1)}{d-1} \\&\quad + \frac{126k(k-1)(4a^{6} -10a^{4} +3a^{2} -k+2)}{(d-1)(d-2)} \biggr ). \end{aligned}$$For \(d \ge 5\)
$$\begin{aligned} f_{10,2}({\tilde{{\varvec{v}}}}_k)&= \frac{1}{k^{4}} \biggl ( k-1 - \frac{18(k-1)(k-2)}{d-2} + \frac{75(k-1)(k-2)(k-3)}{(d-2)(d-3)} \\&\quad - \frac{90(k-1)(k-2)(k-3)(k-4)}{(d-2)(d-3)(d-4)}\biggr ), \\ f_{10,2}({\tilde{{\varvec{v}}}}_{k,a})&= \frac{1}{(a^{2}+k)^{5}} \biggl ( a^{4}k+ a^{6}k + k(k-1) - \frac{3k(k-1)(a^{6}+10a^{4}+7a^{2}+6k-12)}{d-2} \\&\quad + \frac{75k(k-1)(k-2)(a^{4}+3a^{2}+k-3)}{(d-2)(d-3)} \\&\quad - \frac{90k(k-1)(k-2)(k-3)(5a^{2}+k-4)}{(d-2)(d-3)(d-4)} \biggr ). \end{aligned}$$
1.2 C. 2 Group \(D_d\)
Harmonic Molien-Poincaré series
The harmonic Molien–Poincaré series is given by
Dimensions of \(D_d\)-invariant harmonic polynomial spaces
By the above harmonic Molien–Poincaré series, dimensions of \(D_d\)-invariant harmonic polynomial spaces are given by
Basis of \(D_d\)-invariant harmonic polynomial spaces
By direct calculations, it is easy to find a basis of \(D_d\)-invariant harmonic polynomial spaces \(\mathop {\mathrm {Harm}}\nolimits _{\ell }({\mathbb {R}}^d)^{D_d}\).
-
The space \(\mathop {\mathrm {Harm}}\nolimits _{4}({\mathbb {R}}^d)^{D_d}\) is spanned by polynomials \(f_{4, 1}\) and \(f_{4, 2}\) defined as
$$\begin{aligned} f_{4,1}(x)&= \text {sym}(x_1^4) - \frac{6}{d-1} \text {sym}(x_1^2 x_2^2), \quad d \ge 5, \\ f_{4, 2}(x)&= x_1 x_2 x_3 x_4, \quad d = 4. \end{aligned}$$ -
The space \(\mathop {\mathrm {Harm}}\nolimits _{5}({\mathbb {R}}^5)^{D_5}\) is spanned by polynomial defined \(f_{5}\) as
$$\begin{aligned} f_5 = x_1 x_2 x_3 x_4 x_5. \end{aligned}$$ -
\(\mathop {\mathrm {Harm}}\nolimits _{6}({\mathbb {R}}^d)^{D_d}\) is spanned by polynomials \(f_{6, 1}\) and \(f_{6, 2}\) defined as
$$\begin{aligned} f_{6, 1}&= \text {sym}(x_1^6) - \frac{15}{d-1} \text {sym}(x_1^2 x_2^4) + \frac{180}{(d - 1)(d - 2)} \text {sym} (x_1^2 x_2^2 x_3^2), \quad d \ge 4,\; d \ne 6, \\ f_{6, 2}&= x_1 x_2 x_3 x_4 x_5 x_6, \quad d = 6. \end{aligned}$$ -
\(\mathop {\mathrm {Harm}}\nolimits _{7}({\mathbb {R}}^7)^{D_7}\) is spanned by polynomial \(f_{7}\) defined as
$$\begin{aligned} f_{7} = x_1 x_2 x_3 x_4 x_5 x_6 x_7. \end{aligned}$$ -
The space \(\mathop {\mathrm {Harm}}\nolimits _8({\mathbb {R}}^d)^{D_d}\) is spanned by polynomials \(f_{8,1}\), \(f_{8,2}\), \(f_{8, 3}\) respectively, as
$$\begin{aligned} f_{8,1}&= \text {sym}(x_1^8)-\frac{28}{d-1}\text {sym}(x_1^2 x_2^6)+\frac{70}{d-1}\text {sym}(x_1^4 x_2^4), \quad d \ge 4, \\ f_{8,2}&= \text {sym}(x_1^4 x_2^4)-\frac{6}{d-2}\text {sym}(x_1^2 x_2^2 x_3^4) \\&\qquad +\frac{108}{(d-2)(d-3)} \text {sym}(x_1^2 x_2^2 x_3^2 x_4^2), \quad d \ge 4, \\ f_{8, 3}&= \text {sym}(x_1^5 x_2 x_3 x_4) - \frac{10}{9} \text {sym}(x_1^3 x_2^3 x_3 x_4), \quad d = 4, \\ f_{8, 4}&= x_1 x_2 x_3 x_4 x_5 x_6 x_7 x_8, \quad d = 8. \end{aligned}$$ -
The space \(\mathop {\mathrm {Harm}}\nolimits _9({\mathbb {R}}^d)^{D_d}\) is spanned by polynomials \(f_{9,1}\) and \(f_{9,2}\) defined as
$$\begin{aligned} f_{9,1} =&\text {sym}(x_1^5 x_2 x_3 x_4 x_5) -\frac{5}{6} \text {sym}(x_1^3 x_2^3 x_3 x_4 x_5) , \quad d=5. \\ f_{9,2} =&x_1 x_2 x_3 x_4 x_5 x_6 x_7 x_8 x_9, \quad d=9. \end{aligned}$$ -
The space \(\mathop {\mathrm {Harm}}\nolimits _{10}({\mathbb {R}}^d)^{D_d}\) is spanned by polynomials \(f_{10, 1}\), \(f_{10, 2}\), \(f_{10,3}\), \(f_{10, 4}\) and \(f_{10, 5}\) respectively, as
$$\begin{aligned} f_{10,1}&= \text {sym}(x_{1}^{10}) - \frac{45}{d-1} \text {sym}(x_{1}^{2} x_{2}^{8}) + \frac{42}{d-1} \text {sym}(x_{1}^{4} x_{2}^{6}) \\&\quad + \frac{1008}{(d-1)(d-2)} \text {sym}(x_{1}^{2} x_{2}^{2} x_{3}^{6}) \\&\quad - \frac{1260}{(d-1)(d-2)} \text {sym}(x_{1}^{2} x_{2}^{4} x_{3}^{4}), \quad d \ge 4, \\ f_{10,2}&= \text {sym}(x_{1}^{4} x_{2}^{6}) - \frac{6}{d-2} \text {sym}(x_{1}^{2} x_{2}^{2} x_{3}^{6}) - \frac{30}{d-2} \text {sym}(x_{1}^{2} x_{2}^{4} x_{3}^{4}) \\&\quad + \frac{450}{(d-2)(d-3)} \text {sym}(x_{1}^{2}x_{2}^{2}x_{3}^{2}x_{4}^{4}) \\&\quad - \frac{10800}{(d-2)(d-3)(d-4)} \text {sym}(x_{1}^{2} x_{2}^{2} x_{3}^{2} x_{4}^{2} x_{5}^{2}) \quad d \ge 5, \\ f_{10,3}&= \text {sym}(x_1^7 x_2 x_3 x_4) -\frac{7}{3} \text {sym}(x_1^5 x_2^3 x_3 x_4) + \frac{70}{9} \text {sym}(x_1^3 x_2^3 x_3^3 x_4) , \quad d=4, \\ f_{10,4}&= \text {sym}(x_1^5 x_2 x_3 x_4 x_5 x_6) -\frac{2}{3} \text {sym}(x_1^3 x_2^3 x_3 x_4 x_5 x_6) , \quad d=6, \\ f_{10,5}&= x_1 x_2 x_3 x_4 x_5 x_6 x_7 x_8 x_9 x_{10} , \quad d=10. \end{aligned}$$ -
The space \(\mathop {\mathrm {Harm}}\nolimits _{11}({\mathbb {R}}^d)^{D_d}\) is spanned by polynomials \(f_{11, 1}\), \(f_{11, 2}\),and \(f_{11, 3}\) respectively, as
$$\begin{aligned} f_{11,1}&= \text {sym}(x_1^5 x_2^3 x_3 x_4 x_5) - \frac{4}{7} \text {sym}(x_1^7 x_2 x_3 x_4 x_5) - \frac{20}{9} \text {sym}(x_1^3 x_2^3 x_3^3 x_4 x_5) , \quad d=5, \\ f_{11,2}&= \text {sym}(x_1^5 x_2 x_3 x_4 x_5 x_6 x_7) - \frac{5}{9} \text {sym}(x_1^3 x_2^3 x_3 x_4 x_5 x_6 x_7) , \quad d=7, \\ f_{11,3}&= x_1 x_2 x_3 x_4 x_5 x_6 x_7 x_8 x_9 x_{10} x_{11}, \quad d=11. \end{aligned}$$
Substituting \({\varvec{v}}_k\) and \({\varvec{v}}_{k,a}\) for \(D_d\)-invariant harmonic polynomials
-
For \(d \ge 5\)
$$\begin{aligned} f_{4, 1} ({\varvec{v}}_k)&= {\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \displaystyle \frac{1}{k} \left( 1 - 3\frac{k - 1}{d - 1}\right) , &{} 1 \le k \le d - 2, \\ \displaystyle - \frac{2}{d}, \; k = d - 1, d. \end{array}\right. } \\ f_{4,1} ({\varvec{v}}_{k,a})&= {\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \displaystyle \frac{1}{(a^2 + k)^2} \left( a^4 + k - \frac{6}{d - 1} \left( k a^2 + \frac{k (k - 1)}{2} \right) \right) , \quad 1 \le k \le d - 3, \\ \displaystyle \frac{5 - 6 a^2 + a^4 - 2d}{(a^2 + d - 1)^2}, \; k = d - 2, d - 1. \end{array}\right. } \end{aligned}$$For \(d = 4\)
$$\begin{aligned} f_{4, 2}({\varvec{v}}_1) = f_{4, 2}({\varvec{v}}_2) = 0, \quad f_{4, 2}({\varvec{v}}_3) = - \frac{1}{16}, \quad f_{4, 2}({\varvec{v}}_4) = \frac{1}{16}. \end{aligned}$$$$\begin{aligned} f_{4, 2} ({\varvec{v}}_{1, a}) = 0, \quad f_{4, 2} ({\varvec{v}}_{2, a}) = - \frac{a}{(a^2 + 3)^2}, \quad f_{4, 2} ({\varvec{v}}_{3, a}) = \frac{a}{(a^2 + 3)^2}. \end{aligned}$$ -
For \(d = 5\)
$$\begin{aligned} f_5({\varvec{v}}_1)= & {} f_5({\varvec{v}}_2) = f_5({\varvec{v}}_3) = 0, \quad f_5({\varvec{v}}_4) = - \frac{1}{25 \sqrt{5}}, \quad f_5({\varvec{v}}_5) = \frac{1}{25 \sqrt{5}}. \\ f_{5}({\varvec{v}}_{1, a})= & {} f_5 ({\varvec{v}}_{2, a}) = 0, \quad f_{5}({\varvec{v}}_{3, a}) = - \frac{a}{(a^2 + 4)^{5/2}}, \quad f_{5}({\varvec{v}}_{4, a}) = \frac{a}{(a^2 + 4)^{5/2}}. \end{aligned}$$ -
For \(d \ge 4\), \(d \ne 6\)
$$\begin{aligned} f_{6, 1}({\varvec{v}}_k)&= {\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \displaystyle \frac{1}{k^2} \left( 1 - 15 \frac{k - 1}{d - 1} + 30 \frac{(k - 1)(k -2)}{(d - 1)(d - 2)} \right) , \quad 1 \le k \le d - 2, \\ \displaystyle \frac{16}{d^2}, \quad k = d - 1, d. \end{array}\right. } \\ f_{6,1} ({\varvec{v}}_{k,a})&= {\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \displaystyle \frac{1}{(a^2 + k)^3} \bigg (a^6 + k - \frac{15}{d - 1} \left( a^2 k + a^4 k + k (k - 1) \right) \\ \displaystyle \qquad + \frac{180}{(d - 1) (d - 2)} \left( a^2 \frac{k (k - 1)}{2} + \frac{k (k - 1) (k - 2)}{3!} \right) \bigg ), \quad 1 \le k \le d- 3, \\ \displaystyle \frac{-61 + 75 a^2 - 15 a^4 + a^6 + 16 d}{(a^2 + d - 1)^3}, \quad k = d - 2, d - 1. \end{array}\right. } \end{aligned}$$For \(d = 6\)
$$\begin{aligned} f_{6, 2}({\varvec{v}}_1)= & {} \dots = f_{6, 2}({\varvec{v}}_4) = 0, \quad f_{6, 2}({\varvec{v}}_5) = - \frac{1}{216}, \quad f_{6, 2}({\varvec{v}}_6) = \frac{1}{216}. \\ f_{6,2} ({\varvec{v}}_{a,1})= & {} f_{6,2} ({\varvec{v}}_{a,2}) = f_{6,2} ({\varvec{v}}_{a,3}) = 0, \quad \\ f_{6,2} ({\varvec{v}}_{a,4})= & {} - \frac{a}{(a^2 + 5)^3}, \quad f_{6,2} ({\varvec{v}}_{a,4}) = \frac{a}{(a^2 + 5)^3}. \end{aligned}$$ -
For \(d = 7\)
$$\begin{aligned} f_7({\varvec{v}}_1)= & {} \cdots = f_7 ({\varvec{v}}_5) = 0, \quad f_7({\varvec{v}}_6) = - \frac{1}{343\sqrt{7}}, \quad f({\varvec{v}}_7) = \frac{1}{343\sqrt{7}}. \\ f_{7}({\varvec{v}}_{1,a})= & {} \cdots = f_7({\varvec{v}}_{5,a}) = 0, \quad f_{7}({\varvec{v}}_{6,a}) = - \frac{a}{(a^2 + 6)^{7/2}},\\ f_{7}({\varvec{v}}_{6,a}) =& - \frac{a}{(a^2 + 6)^{7/2}}. \end{aligned}$$ -
For \(d \ge 2\)
$$\begin{aligned} f_{8,1} ({\varvec{v}}_k)&= {\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \displaystyle \frac{1}{k^3} \left( 1 + 7 \frac{k - 1}{d - 1} \right) , \quad 1 \le k \le d - 2, \\ \displaystyle \frac{8}{d^3}, \quad k = d - 1, d. \end{array}\right. } \\ f_{8,1} ({\varvec{v}}_{k,a})&= {\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \displaystyle \frac{1}{(a^2 + k)^4} \bigg (a^8 + k - \frac{28}{d - 1} (a^2 k + a^6 k + k (k - 1)) \\ \displaystyle \qquad + \frac{70}{d - 1}\left( a^4 k + \frac{k (k - 1)}{2} \right) \bigg ), \quad 1 \le k \le d - 3, \\ \displaystyle \frac{-15 - 28 a^2 + 70 a^4 - 28 a^6 + a^8 + 8 d}{(a^2 + d - 1)^4}, \quad k = d - 2, d - 1. \end{array}\right. } \end{aligned}$$For \(d \ge 4\)
$$\begin{aligned} f_{8,2} ({\varvec{v}}_k)&= {\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \displaystyle \frac{k - 1}{2 k^3} \left( 1 - 6 \frac{k - 2}{d - 2} + 9 \frac{(k - 2) (k - 3)}{(d - 2)(d - 3)} \right) , \quad 1 \le k \le d - 2, \\ \displaystyle \frac{2(d - 1)}{d^3}, \quad k = d - 1, d. \end{array}\right. } \\ f_{8,2} ({\varvec{v}}_{a,k})&= {\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \displaystyle \frac{1}{(a^2 + k)^4} \bigg (a^4 k + \frac{(k-1) k}{2} - \frac{6}{d -2} \displaystyle \bigg (a^2 (k -1) k + \frac{a^2 (k-1) k}{2} \\ \qquad + \frac{(k - 2) (k - 1) k}{2} \bigg ) + \frac{9 k (-3 + 4 a^2 + k) (k - 2)(k - 1)}{2 (d - 3) (d - 2)} \bigg ), \quad 1 \le k \le d - 3, \\ \displaystyle \frac{- 2 (5 - 6 a^2 + a^4 - d) (-1 + d)}{(a^2 + d - 1)^4}, \quad k = d - 2, d - 1. \end{array}\right. } \end{aligned}$$For \(d = 4\)
$$\begin{aligned} f_{8,3} ({\varvec{v}}_1)= & {} f_{8, 3} ({\varvec{v}}_2) = 0, \quad f_{8,3} ({\varvec{v}}_3) = - \frac{1}{96}, \quad f_{8,3} ({\varvec{v}}_4) = \frac{1}{96}. \\ f_{8, 3} ({\varvec{v}}_{a,a})= & {} 0, \quad f_{8, 3} ({\varvec{v}}_{2,a}) = \frac{a + 10 a^3 - 3 a^5}{3 (3 + a^2)^4}, \quad f_{8, 3} ({\varvec{v}}_{3,a}) = \frac{-a - 10 a^3 + 3 a^5}{3 (3 + a^2)^4}. \end{aligned}$$For \(d = 8\),
$$\begin{aligned} f_{8, 4}({\varvec{v}}_1)= & {} \cdots f_{8,4}({\varvec{v}}_6) = 0, \quad f_{8, 4}({\varvec{v}}_7) = - \frac{1}{4096}, \quad f_{8, 4}({\varvec{v}}_8) = \frac{1}{4096}. \\ f_{8, 4}({\varvec{v}}_{1,a})= & {} \cdots f_{8,4}({\varvec{v}}_{6,a}) = 0, \quad f_{8, 4}({\varvec{v}}_{7,a}) = - \frac{a}{(a^2 + 7)^4}, \quad f_{8, 4}({\varvec{v}}_{8,a}) = \frac{a}{(a^2 + 7)^4}. \end{aligned}$$ -
For \(d=5\)
$$\begin{aligned} f_{9,1} ({\varvec{v}}_{1})= & {} f_{9, 1} ({\varvec{v}}_{2}) = f_{9,1} ({\varvec{v}}_{3}) = 0, \quad f_{9, 1} ({\varvec{v}}_{4}) = \frac{2}{375 \sqrt{5}}, \quad f_{9,1} ({\varvec{v}}_{5}) = - \frac{2}{375 \sqrt{5}}. \\ f_{9,1}({\varvec{v}}_{1,a})= & {} f_{9,1}({\varvec{v}}_{2,a}) = 0, \quad f_{9,1}({\varvec{v}}_{3,a}) = \frac{1}{(a^2 + 4)^{\frac{9}{2}}} \left( -a^5 + \frac{10}{3} a^3 + a \right) , \quad \\ f_{9,1}({\varvec{v}}_{4,a})= & {} \frac{1}{(a^2 + 4)^{\frac{9}{2}}} \left( a^5 - \frac{10}{3} a^3 - a \right) . \end{aligned}$$For \(d = 9\)
$$\begin{aligned} f_{9,2} ({\varvec{v}}_1)= & {} \cdots = f_{9, 2} ({\varvec{v}}_7) = 0, \quad f_{9,2} ({\varvec{v}}_{8}) = - \frac{1}{19683}, \quad f_{9,2} ({\varvec{v}}_{9}) = \frac{1}{19683}. \\ f_{9,2}({\varvec{v}}_{1,a})= & {} \cdots = f_{9,2}({\varvec{v}}_{6,a}) = 0, \quad f_{9,2}({\varvec{v}}_{7,a}) = - \frac{a}{(a^2 + 8)^{\frac{9}{2}}}, \quad \\ f_{9,2}({\varvec{v}}_{8,a})= & {} \frac{a}{(a^2 + 8)^{\frac{9}{2}}}. \end{aligned}$$ -
For \(d \ge 4\)
$$\begin{aligned} f_{10,1}({\varvec{v}}_{k})&= {\left\{ \begin{array}{ll}\!\frac{1}{k^5} \left( k - \frac{3k(k-1)}{d-1} - \frac{126k(k-1)(k-2)}{(d-1)(d-2)} \right) , &{} 1 \le k \le d-2, \\\! \frac{1}{d^5} \left( k-1 - \frac{3k(k+1)}{d-1} - \frac{126k(k+1)(k-1)}{(d-1)(d-2)} \right) , & k=d-1, \\\! \frac{1}{d^5} \left( k - \frac{3k(k-1)}{d-1} - \frac{126k(k-1)(k-2)}{(d-1)(d-2)} \right) , \; k=d. \end{array}\right. } \\ g_{10,1}({\varvec{v}}_{k,a})&= {\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \frac{1}{(a^2 + k)^5} \Biggl ( a^{10} + k - \frac{45}{d-1} \left( a^2 k + a^8 k + k(k-1)\right) + \frac{42}{d-1} \left( a^4 k + a^6 k + k(k-1) \right) \\ \quad + \frac{1008}{(d-1)(d-2)} \left( \frac{a^6 k(k-1)}{2} + a^2 k(k-1) + \frac{k(k-1)(k-2)}{2} \right) \\ \quad - \frac{1260}{(d-1)(d-2)} \left( \frac{a^2 k (k-1)}{2} + a^4 k(k-1) + \frac{k(k-1)(k-2)}{2} \right) \Biggr ), \; 1 \le k \le d-3, \\ \frac{1}{(a^2 + d-1)^5} \Biggl ( a^{10} + k - \frac{45}{d-1} \left( a^8 k + a^2 k + k^2 - k \right) + \frac{42}{d-1} \left( a^6 k + a^4 k + k^2 -k \right) \\ \quad + \frac{1008}{(d-1)(d-2)} \Bigl ( a^6 (k-1) + \frac{a^6 (k-1)(k-2)}{2} + \frac{(k-1)(k-2)}{2} + 2a^2 (k-1) + a^2 (k-1)(k-2) \\ \quad + (k-1)(k-2) + \frac{(k-1)(k-2)(k-3)}{2} \Bigr ) - \frac{1260}{(d-1)(d-2)} \Bigl ( a^2(k-1) + \frac{a^2 (k-1)(k-2)}{2} + \frac{(k-1)(k-2)}{2} \\ \quad + 2a^4 (k-1) + a^4 (k-1)(k-2) + (k-1)(k-2) + \frac{(k-1)(k-2)(k-3)}{2} \Bigr ) \Biggr ), \; k=d-2, \\ \frac{1}{(a^2 + d-1)^5} \Biggl ( a^{10} + k - 1 - \frac{45}{d-1} \Bigl ( a^2(k-1) + a^8(k-1) + (k-1)(k-2) \Bigr ) \\ \quad + \frac{42}{d-1} \Bigl ( a^4(k-1) + a^6(k-1) + (k-1)(k-2) \Bigr ) + \frac{1008}{(d-1)(d-2)} \Bigl ( \frac{a^6(k-1)(k-2)}{2} + a^2(k-1)(k-2) \\ \quad + \frac{(k-1)(k-2)(k-3)}{2} \Bigr ) - \frac{1260}{(d-1)(d-2)} \Bigl ( \frac{a^2(k-1)(k-2)}{2} + a^4(k-1)(k-2) + \frac{(k-1)(k-2)(k-3)}{2} \Bigr ) \Biggr ), \; k=d -1. \end{array}\right. } \end{aligned}$$ -
For \(d \ge 5\)
$$\begin{aligned} f_{10,2}({\varvec{v}}_{k})&= {\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \frac{1}{k^5} \Bigl ( k(k-1) - \frac{18k(k-1)(k-2)}{n-2} + \frac{75k(k-1)(k-2)(k-3)}{(n-2)(n-3)} - \frac{90k(k-1)(k-2)(k-3)(k-4)}{(n-2)(n-3)(n-4)} \Bigr ), \; 1 \le k \le d-2, \\ \frac{1}{n^5} \Biggl ( k(k+1) - \frac{18k(k+1)(k-1)}{n-2} + \frac{450}{(n-2)(n-3)}\Bigl ( \frac{k(k-1)(k-2)}{2} + \frac{k(k-1)(k-2)(k-3)}{3!} + \frac{k(k-1)(k-2)}{3!} \Bigr ) \\ \quad - \frac{10800}{(n-2)(n-3)(n-4)} \left( \frac{k(k-1)(k-2)(k-3)}{4!} + \frac{k(k-1)(k-2)(k-3)(k-4)}{5!} \right) \Biggr ), \; k=d-1, \\ \frac{1}{n^5} \Bigl ( k(k-1) - \frac{18k(k-1)(k-2)}{n-2} + \frac{75k(k-1)(k-2)(k-3)}{(n-2)(n-3)} - \frac{90k(k-1)(k-2)(k-3)(k-4)}{(n-2)(n-3)(n-4)} \Bigr ), \; k=d. \end{array}\right. } \\ g_{10,2}({\varvec{v}}_{k,a})&= {\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \frac{1}{(a^2 + k)^5} \Biggl ( a^4 k + a^6 k + k(k-1) - \frac{6}{d-2} \Bigl ( \frac{a^6 k(k-1)}{2} + a^2 k(k-1)+ \frac{k(k-1)(k-2)}{2} \Bigr ) \\ \quad - \frac{30}{d-2} \left( \frac{a^2 k(k-1)}{2} + a^4 k(k-1) + \frac{k(k-1)(k-2)}{2} \right) + \frac{450}{(d-2)(d-3)} \Bigl ( \frac{a^4 k(k-1)(k-2)}{3!} \\ \quad + \frac{a^2 k(k-1)(k-2)}{2}+ \frac{k(k-1)(k-2)(k-3)}{3!} \Bigr ) \\ \quad - \frac{10800}{(d-2)(d-3)(d-4)} \Bigl ( \frac{a^2 k(k-1)(k-2)(k-3)}{4!} + \frac{k(k-1)(k-2)(k-3)(k-4)}{5!} \Bigr ) \Biggr ), \; 1 \le k \le d - 3, \\ \frac{1}{(a^2 + d-1)^5} \Biggl ( a^4 k + a^6 k + k^2 -k - \frac{6}{d-2} \Bigl ( a^6(k-1) + \frac{a^6(k-1)(k-2)}{2} + 2a^2(k-1) \\ \quad + \frac{(k-1)(k-2)}{2} + a^2(k-1)(k-2) + (k-1)(k-2) + \frac{(k-1)(k-2)(k-3)}{2} \Bigr ) \\ \quad - \frac{30}{d-2} \Bigl ( a^2(k-1) + \frac{a^2(k-1)(k-2)}{2} + 2a^4(k-1) + \frac{(k-1)(k-2)}{2} + a^4(k-1)(k-2) \\ \quad + (k-1)(k-2) + \frac{(k-1)(k-2)(k-3)}{2} \Bigr ) + \frac{450}{(d-2)(d-3)} \Bigl ( \frac{a^4(k-1)(k-2)}{2} \\ \quad + \frac{a^4(k-1)(k-2)(k-3)}{3!} + \frac{a^2(k-1)(k-2)}{2} + \frac{(k-1)(k-2)(k-3)}{3!} + a^2(k-1)(k-2) \\ \quad + \frac{a^2(k-1)(k-2)(k-3)}{2} + \frac{(k-1)(k-2)(k-3)}{2} + \frac{(k-1)(k-2)(k-3)(k-4)}{3!} \Bigr ) \\ \quad - \frac{10800}{(d-2)(d-3)(d-4)} \Bigl ( \frac{a^2(k-1)(k-2)(k-3)}{3!} + \frac{a^2(k-1)(k-2)(k-3)(k-4)}{4!} \\ \quad + \frac{(k-1)(k-2)(k-3)(k-4)}{4!} + \frac{(k-1)(k-2)(k-3)(k-4)(k-5)}{5!} \Bigr ) \Biggr ), \; k=d-2, \\ \frac{1}{(a^2 + d - 1)^5} \Biggl ( a^4(k-1) + a^6(k-1) + (k-1)(k-2) - \frac{6}{d-2} \Bigl ( \frac{a^6(k-1)(k-2)}{2} + a^2(k-1)(k-2) \\ \quad + \frac{(k-1)(k-2)(k-3)}{2} \Bigr ) - \frac{30}{d-2} \Bigl ( \frac{a^2(k-1)(k-2)}{2} + a^4(k-1)(k-2) + \frac{(k-1)(k-2)(k-3)}{2} \Bigr ) \\ \quad + \frac{450}{(d-2)(d-3)} \Bigl ( \frac{a^4(k-1)(k-2)(k-3)}{3!} + \frac{a^2(k-1)(k-2)(k-3)}{2} + \frac{(k-1)(k-2)(k-3)(k-4)}{3!} \Bigr ) \\ \quad - \frac{10800}{(d-2)(d-3)(d-4)} \Bigl ( \frac{a^2(k-1)(k-2)(k-3)(k-4)}{4!} + \frac{(k-1)(k-2)(k-3)(k-4)(k-5)}{5!} \Bigr ) \Biggr ),\; k=d-1. \end{array}\right. } \end{aligned}$$ -
For \(d = 4\)
$$\begin{aligned} f_{10,3} ({\varvec{v}}_{1})&= f_{10, 3} ({\varvec{v}}_{2})= 0, \quad f_{10,3} ({\varvec{v}}_{3}) = - \frac{1}{144}, \quad f_{10,3} ({\varvec{v}}_{4}) = \frac{1}{144}. \\ f_{10,3} ({\varvec{v}}_{1,a})&= 0, \quad f_{10,3} ({\varvec{v}}_{2,a}) = \frac{1}{(a^2+3)^5} \left( -a^7 + 7a^5 - \frac{49}{3}a^3 + \frac{29}{9}a \right) , \\ f_{10,3} ({\varvec{v}}_{3,a})&= \frac{1}{(a^2+3)^5} \left( a^7 - 7a^5 + \frac{49}{3}a^3 - \frac{29}{9}a \right) . \end{aligned}$$ -
For \(d=6\)
$$\begin{aligned} f_{10,4}({\varvec{v}}_{1})&= \cdots = f_{10, 4} ({\varvec{v}}_{4}) = 0, \quad f_{10, 4}({\varvec{v}}_{5}) = \frac{1}{1944}, \quad f_{10, 4} ({\varvec{v}}_6) = - \frac{1}{1944}. \\ f_{10,4} ({\varvec{v}}_{1,a})&= \cdots = f_{10,4} ({\varvec{v}}_{3,a}) = 0, \quad f_{10,4} ({\varvec{v}}_{4,a}) = \frac{1}{(a^2+5)^5} \left( - a^5 + \frac{10}{3}a^3 + \frac{5}{3}a \right) , \quad \\ f_{10,4} ({\varvec{v}}_{5, a})&= \frac{1}{(a^2+5)^5} \left( a^5 - \frac{10}{3}a^3 - \frac{5}{3}a \right) . \end{aligned}$$ -
For \(d=10\)
$$\begin{aligned} f_{10,5} ({\varvec{v}}_{1})&= \cdots f_{10,5} ({\varvec{v}}_{8})= 0, \quad f_{10,5} ({\varvec{v}}_{9}) = - \frac{1}{100000}, \quad f_{10,5} ({\varvec{h}}_{k}) = \frac{1}{100000}. \\ f_{10,5} ({\varvec{v}}_{1, a})&= \cdots f_{10,5} ({\varvec{v}}_{7,a}) = 0, \quad f_{10,5} ({\varvec{v}}_{8,a}) = - \frac{a}{(a^2+9)^5}, \quad \\ f_{10,5} ({\varvec{v}}_{9,a})&= \frac{a}{(a^2+9)^5}. \end{aligned}$$ -
For \(d=5\)
$$\begin{aligned} f_{11,1} ({\varvec{v}}_{1})&= \cdots = f_{11,1}({\varvec{v}}_3) = 0, \quad f_{11,1} ({\varvec{v}}_{4}) = \frac{64}{39375 \sqrt{5}}, \quad f_{11,1} ({\varvec{v}}_{5}) = - \frac{64}{39375 \sqrt{5}}. \\ f_{11,1} ({\varvec{v}}_{1,a})&= f_{11,1} ({\varvec{v}}_{2,a})= 0, \quad f_{11,1} ({\varvec{v}}_{3,a}) = \frac{1}{(a^2+4)^{\frac{11}{2}}} \left( \frac{4}{7}a^7 - 4a^5 + \frac{28}{3}a^3 - \frac{52}{63}a \right) , \\ f_{11,1} ({\varvec{v}}_{4,a})&= \frac{1}{(a^2+4)^{\frac{11}{2}}} \left( - \frac{4}{7}a^7 + 4a^5 - \frac{28}{3}a^3 + \frac{52}{63}a \right) . \end{aligned}$$ -
For \(d = 7\)
$$\begin{aligned} f_{11,2} ({\varvec{v}}_{1})&= \cdots = f_{11,2} ({\varvec{v}}_{5})= 0, \quad f_{11,2} ({\varvec{v}}_{6}) = \frac{2}{7203 \sqrt{7}}, \quad f_{11,2} ({\varvec{v}}_{7}) = - \frac{2}{7203 \sqrt{7}}. \\ f_{11,2} ({\varvec{v}}_{1,a})&= \cdots = f_{11,4}({\varvec{v}}_{4,a}) = 0, \quad f_{11,2} ({\varvec{v}}_{5,a}) = \frac{1}{(a^2 + 6)^{\frac{11}{2}}} \left( -a^5 + \frac{10}{3}a^3 + \frac{7}{3}a \right) , \\ f_{11,2} ({\varvec{v}}_{6,a})&= \frac{1}{(a^2 + 6)^{\frac{11}{2}}} \left( a^5 - \frac{10}{3}a^3 - \frac{7}{3}a \right) . \end{aligned}$$ -
For \(d=11\)
$$\begin{aligned} f_{11,3} ({\varvec{v}}_{k})&= \cdots = f_{11,3}({\varvec{v}}_{9})= 0, \quad f_{11,3} ({\varvec{v}}_{10}) = - \frac{1}{161051 \sqrt{11}}, \quad \\ f_{11,3} ({\varvec{v}}_{11})&= \frac{1}{161051 \sqrt{11}}. \\ f_{11,3} ({\varvec{v}}_{1,a})&= \cdots = f_{11,3} ({\varvec{v}}_{8,a}) = 0, \quad f_{11,3} ({\varvec{v}}_{9,a}) = - \frac{a}{(a^2 + 10)^{\frac{11}{2}}}, \quad \\ f_{11,3} ({\varvec{v}}_{10,a})&= \frac{a}{(a^2 + 10)^{\frac{11}{2}}}. \end{aligned}$$
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sawa, M., Hirao, M. & Ito, K. Geometric Designs and Rotatable Designs I. Graphs and Combinatorics 37, 1605–1651 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00373-021-02274-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00373-021-02274-0