Skip to main content
Log in

A general model for visual motion detection

  • Published:
Biological Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We propose a general model for detection of both first-order motion and second-order motion. In this model an input stimulus is divided into a number of partially overlapping spatiotemporal local regions. Spatiotemporal frequency analysis is done for every local region using Gabor filters, then the input stimulus (original spatiotemporal signal) is replaced by the outputs of Gabor filters. Local motion is detected by applying Gabor motion detectors to each local spatiotemporal pattern depicted by each local feature value. Outputs of all the detectors are integrated to give the final output for global motion of the input stimulus. The model was simulated on a computer and was confirmed to correctly detect second-order motion as well as first-order motion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adelson EH, Bergen JR (1985) Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. J Opt Soc Am A 2:284–299

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baker CL Jr (1999) Central neural mechanisms for detecting second-order motion. Curr Opin Neurobiol 9(4):461–466

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baker CL Jr, Mareschal I (2001) Processing of second-order stimuli in the visual cortex. Prog Brain Res 134:171–191

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cavanagh P, Mather G (1989) Motion: the long and short of it. Spatial Vision 4:103–129

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chubb C, Sperling G (1988) Drift-balanced random stimuli: a general basis for studying non-Fourier motion perception. J Opt Soc Am A 5:1986–2007

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dumoulin SO, Baker CL Jr, Hess RF, Evans AC (2003) Cortical specialization for processing first- and second-order motion. Cereb Cortex 13(12):1375–1385

    Google Scholar 

  7. Grywacz NM, Yuille AL (1991) A model for the estimate of local image velocity by cells in the visual cortex. Proc R Soc Lond B 23:129–161

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nishida S, Sato T (1994) Motion detection mechanism in the human visual system. J Ins TV Eng 48:157–163 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nishida S, Ledgeway T, Edwards M (1997) Dual multiple-scale processing for motion in the human visual system. Vision Res 37:2685–2698

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shioiri S, Cavanagh P (1989) Duality of motion perception. Kougaku (Optics) 18:516–523 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Taub E, Victor JD, Conte MM (1997) Nonlinear preprocessing in short-range motion. Vision Res 37:1459–1477

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vaina LM, Soloviev S (2004) First-order and second-order motion: neurological evidence for neuroanatomically distinct systems. Prog Brain Res 144:197–212

    Google Scholar 

  13. Watson AB, Ahumada AJ (1985) Model of human visual motion sensing. J Opt Soc Am A 2:322–341

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zanker JM (1996) On the elementary mechanism underlying secondary motion processing. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 351(1348):1725–1736

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takashi Nagano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nagano, T., Hirahara, M. & Urushihara, . A general model for visual motion detection. Biol. Cybern. 91, 99–103 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-004-0493-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-004-0493-3

Keywords

Navigation