Abstract
In rhythmic movements, humans activate their muscles in a robust and energy efficient way. These activation patterns are oscillatory and seem to originate from neural networks in the spinal cord, called central pattern generators (CPGs). Evidence for the existence of CPGs was found for instance in lampreys, cats and rats. There are indications that CPGs exist in humans as well, but this is not proven yet. Energy efficiency is achieved by resonance tuning: the central nervous system is able to tune into the resonance frequency of the limb, which is determined by the local reflex gains. The goal of this study is to investigate if the existence of a CPG in the human spine can explain the resonance tuning behavior, observed in human rhythmic limb movement. A neuro-musculo-skeletal model of the forearm is proposed, in which a CPG is organized in parallel to the local reflexloop. The afferent and efferent connections to the CPG are based on clues about the organization of the CPG, found in literature. The model is kept as simple as possible (i.e., lumped muscle models, groups of neurons are lumped into half-centers, simple reflex model), but incorporates enough of the essential dynamics to explain behavior—such as resonance tuning—in a qualitative way. Resonance tuning is achieved above, at and below the endogenous frequency of the CPG in a highly non-linear neuro- musculo-skeletal model. Afferent feedback of muscle lengthening to the CPG is necessary to accomplish resonance tuning above the endogenous frequency of the CPG, while feedback of muscle velocity is necessary to compensate for the phase lag, caused by the time delay in the loop coupling the limb to the CPG. This afferent feedback of muscle lengthening and velocity represents the Ia and II fibers, which—according to literature—is the input to the CPG. An internal process of the CPG, which integrates the delayed muscle lengthening and feeds it to the half-center model, provides resonance tuning below the endogenous frequency. Increased co-contraction makes higher movement frequencies possible. This agrees with studies of rhythmic forearm movements, which have shown that co-contraction increases with movement frequency. Robustness against force perturbations originates mainly from the CPG and the local reflex loop. The CPG delivers an increasing part of the necessary muscle activation for increasing perturbation size. As far as we know, the proposed neuro-musculo-skeletal model is the first that explains the observed resonance tuning in human rhythmic limb movement.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
Abe MO, Yamada N (2003) Modulation of elbow joint stiffness in a vertical plane during cyclic movement at lower or higher frequencies than natural frequency. Exp Brain Res 153:394–399
Amemiya M, Yamaguchi T (1984) Fictive locomotion of the forelimb evoked by stimulation of the mesencephalic locomotor region in the decerebrate cat. Neurosci Lett 50:91–96
Baev KV, Esipenko VB, Shimansky YP (1991) Afferent control of central pattern generators: experimental analysis of scratching in the decerebrate cat. Neuroscience 40:239–256
Barbeau H, McCrea DA, O’Donovan MJ, Rossignol S, Grill WM, Lemay MA (1999) Tapping into spinal circuits to restore motor function. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 30:27–51
Barthe JY, Clarac F (1997) Modulation of the spinal network for locomotion by substance P in the neonatal rat. Exp Brain Res 115:485–492
Bennett DJ, Hollerbach JM, Xu Y, Hunter IW (1992) Time-varying stiffness of human elbow joint during cyclic voluntary movement. Exp Brain Res 88:433–442
Brooke JD, Cheng J, Collins DF, McIlroy WE, Misiaszek JE, Staines WR (1997) Sensori–sensory afferent conditioning with leg movement: gain control in spinal reflex and ascending paths. Prog Neurobiol 51:393–421
Brown TG (1911) The intrinsic factors in the act of progression in the mammal. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society, vol B84, London, pp 308–319
Burke RE (2001) The central pattern generator for locomotion in mammals. Adv Neurol 87:11–24
Burke RE, Degtyarenko AM, Simon ES (2001) Patterns of locomotor drive to motoneurons and last-order interneurons: clues to the structure of the CPG. J Neurophysiol 86: 447–462
Butt SJ, Lebret JM, Kiehn O (2002) Organization of left–right coordination in the mammalian locomotor network. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 40:107–117
Cannon SC, Zahalak GI (1982) The mechanical behavior of active human skeletal muscle in small oscillations. J Biomech 15:111–121
Capaday C (2002) The special nature of human walking and its neural control. Trends Neurosci 25:370–376
Carroll TJ, Baldwin ER, Collins DF, Zehr EP (2006) Corticospinal excitability is lower during rhythmic arm movement than during tonic contraction. J Neurophysiol 95:914–921
Cazalets JR, Borde M, Clarac F (1995) Localization and organization of the central pattern generator for hindlimb locomotion in newborn rat. J Neurosci 15:4943–4951
Cohen AH, Wallen P (1980) The neuronal correlate of locomotion in fish. “Fictive swimming” induced in an in vitro preparation of the lamprey spinal cord. Exp Brain Res 41:11–18
Dietz V (2002) Do human bipeds use quadrupedal coordination? Trends Neurosci 25:462–467
Dimitrijevic MR, Gerasimenko Y, Pinter MM (1998) Evidence for a spinal central pattern generator in humans. Ann N Y Acad Sci 860:360–376
Duysens J, Van de Crommert HW (1998) Neural control of locomotion. The central pattern generator from cats to humans. Gait Posture 7:131–141
Duysens J, Clarac F, Cruse H (2000) Load-regulating mechanisms in gait and posture: comparative aspects. Physiol Rev 80: 83–133
Engelborghs K, Luzyanina T, Samaey G (2001) DDE-BIFTOOL v. 2.00: a Matlab package for bifurcation analysis of delay differential equations. Technical Report TW-330, Department of Computer Science, K.U. Leuven, Leuven
Feldman AG (1980) Superposition of motor programs—I. Rhythmic forearm movements in man. Neuroscience 5:81–90
Friesen WO (1994) Reciprocal inhibition: a mechanism underlying oscillatory animal movements. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 18:547–553
Grillner S, McCellan A, Perret C (1981) Entrainment of the spinal pattern generators for swimming by mechano- sensitive elements in the lamprey spinal cord in vitro. Brain Res 217:380–386
Hatsopoulos NG, Warren WH Jr (1996) Resonance tuning in rhythmic arm Movements. J Mot Behav 28:3–14
Hayes KC, Hatze H (1977) Passive visco-elastic properties of the structures spanning the human elbow joint. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 37:265–274
Kearney RE, Lortie M, Stein RB (1999) Modulation of stretch reflexes during imposed walking movements of the human ankle. J Neurophysiol 81:2893–2902
Kugler PN, Turvey MT (1987) Information, natural law, and the self-assembly of rhythmic movement. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 481
Latash ML (1992) Virtual trajectories, joint stiffness, and changes in the limb natural frequency during single-joint oscillatory movements. Neuroscience 49:209–220
MacKay-Lyons M (2002) Central pattern generation of locomotion: a review of the evidence. Phys Ther 82:69–83
Marchetti C, Beato M, Nistri A (2001) Alternating rhythmic activity induced by dorsal root stimulation in the neonatal rat spinal cord in vitro. J Physiol 530:105–112
Matsuoka K (1985) Sustained oscillations generated by mutually inhibiting neurons with adaptation. Biol Cybern 52:367–376
Matsuoka K (1987) Mechanisms of frequency and pattern control in the neural rhythm generators. Biol Cybern 56:345–353
McCrea DA (2001) Spinal circuitry of sensorimotor control of locomotion. J Physiol 533:41–50
Nakamura Y, Katakura N, Nakajima M (1999) Generation of rhythmical ingestive activities of the trigeminal, facial, and hypoglossal motoneurons in in vitro CNS preparations isolated from rats and mice. J Med Dent Sci 46:63–73
Pailhous J, Bonnard M, Coyle T (1996) Autonomy versus forcing in the organization of human rhythmic forearm movements. C R Acad Sci III 319:773–777
Perreault EJ, Crago PE, Kirsch RF (2000) Estimation of intrinsic and reflex contributions to muscle dynamics: a modeling study. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 47:1413–1421
Rossignol S, Bouyer L, Barthelemy D, Langlet C, Leblond H (2002) Recovery of locomotion in the cat following spinal cord lesions. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 40:257–266
Schaal S, Sternad D, Osu R, Kawato M (2004) Rhythmic arm movement is not discrete. Nat Neurosci 7:1136–1143
Shik ML, Severin FV, Orlovskii GN (1966) Control of walking and running by means of electrical stimulation of the mid-brain. Biophysics 11:756–765
Sqalli-Houssaini Y, Cazalets JR, Clarac F (1993) Oscillatory properties of the central pattern generator for locomotion in neonatal rats. J Neurophysiol 70:803–813
Taylor BE, Lukowiak K (2000) The respiratory central pattern generator of Lymnaea: a model, measured and malleable. Respir Physiol 122:197–207
Van de Crommert HW, Mulder T, Duysens J (1998) Neural control of locomotion: sensory control of the central pattern generator and its relation to treadmill training. Gait Posture 7:251–263
Verdaasdonk BW, Koopman HF, Van Gils SA, Van Der Helm FC (2004) Bifurcation and stability analysis in musculoskeletal systems: a study in human stance. Biol Cybern 91:48–62
Verdaasdonk BW, Koopman HF, Van Der Helm FC (2005) Energy efficient and robust rhythmic limb movement by central pattern generators. Biol Cybern (in press)
Verdaasdonk BW, Koopman HF, Helm FC (2006) Energy efficient and robust rhythmic limb movement by central pattern generators. Neural Netw 19:388–400
Whelan PJ (1996) Control of locomotion in the decerebrate cat. Prog Neurobiol 49:481–515
Winters JM, Stark L (1985) Analysis of fundamental human movement patterns through the use of in- depth antagonistic muscle models. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 32:826–839
Winters JM, Stark L (1987) Muscle models: what is gained and what is lost by varying model complexity. Biol Cybern 55:403–420
Winters JM, Stark L (1988) Estimated mechanical properties of synergistic muscles involved in movements of a variety of human joints. J Biomech 21:1027–1041
Zehr EP, Chua R (2000) Modulation of human cutaneous reflexes during rhythmic cyclical arm movement. Exp Brain Res 135:241–250
Zehr EP, Collins DF, Frigon A, Hoogenboom N (2003) Neural control of rhythmic human arm movement: phase dependence and task modulation of hoffmann reflexes in forearm muscles. J Neurophysiol 89:12–21
Zehr EP, Kido A (2001) Neural control of rhythmic, cyclical human arm movement: task dependency, nerve specificity and phase modulation of cutaneous reflexes. J Physiol 537: 1033–1045
Zhang LQ, Rymer WZ (1997) Simultaneous and nonlinear identification of mechanical and reflex properties of human elbow joint muscles. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 44:1192–1209
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Verdaasdonk, B.W., Koopman, H.F.J.M. & Van der Helm, F.C.T. Resonance tuning in a neuro-musculo-skeletal model of the forearm. Biol Cybern 96, 165–180 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-006-0112-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-006-0112-6