Abstract.
A computational model to help explain effects of adaptation to moving signals is compared with established energy (linear regression) models of motion detection. The proposed model assumes that processed image signals are subject to error in both dimensions of space and time. This assumption constrains models of motion perception to be based upon principal component regression rather than linear regression. It is shown that response suppression of model complex cell neurons that input into the model may account for (1) increases in perceived speed after adaptation to static patterns and testing with slowly moving patterns, (2) significant increases in perceived speed after adaptation to patterns moving at a medium speed and testing at high speed, and (3) decreases in perceived speed in the opponent direction to a quickly moving adapting signal. Neither of predictions (2) or (3) are general features of established accounts of motion detection by visual processes based upon linear regression. Comparisons of the proposed model's speed transfer function with existing psychophysical data suggests that the visual system processes motion signals with the tacit assumption that image measurements are subject to error in both space and time.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received: 24 January 2000 / Accepted in revised form: 8 May 2000
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Langley, K. A model of motion adaptation and motion after-effects based upon principal component regression. Biol Cybern 83, 407–417 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004220000184
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004220000184