Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Poster abstract: demand response market considering dynamic pricing

  • Special Issue Paper
  • Published:
Computer Science - Research and Development

Abstract

In this work, a power market framework is presented comprised of demand response aggregators (DRAs) trading energy stored in residential batteries. Competition is modeled by a Stackelberg game, with market clearing hourly, which determines each DRAs bidding strategy that will maximize payoff. The magnitude and price of power transactions allowable is controlled by the game’s leader. Dynamic pricing is considered in two forms. As demand updates, dynamic economic dispatch is used to update utility generator dispatch. The marginal electrical price offered by the utility updates each time interval reflecting updated supply and demand (real time pricing). Time-of-use load scheduling through dynamic programing combined with dynamic pricing optimizes load scheduling and reduces total demand in the system. The method schedules utility generation minimizing supply-side operational cost, and in turn, demand-side electricity cost at all times (valley, peak, off-peak) and is thus mutually advantageous.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Khazaei H, Vahidi B, Hosseinian SH, Rastegar H (2015) Two-level decision-making model for a distribution company in day-ahead market. IET Gener Trans Distrib 9:1308–1315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sabounchi M, Khazaei H, Sani S.K.H (2014) A new residential demand response management method based on a social welfare optimization framework Kuala Lumpur. In 2nd international conference on electrical. electronics and system engineering (ICEESE)

  3. Motalleb M, Thornton M, Reihani E, Ghorbani R (2016) A nascent market for contingency reserve services using demand response. Appl Energy 179:985–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Motalleb M, Thornton M, Reihani E, Ghorbani R (2016) Providing frequency regulation reserve services using demand response scheduling. Energy Convers Manag 124:439–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Reihani E, Motalleb M, Ghorbani R, Saoud LS (2016) Load peak shaving and power smoothing of a distribution grid with high renewable energy penetration. Renew Energy 86:1372–1379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Reihani E, Motalleb M, Thornton M, Ghorbani R (2016) A novel approach using flexible scheduling and aggregation to optimize demand response in the developing interactive grid market architecture. Appl Energy 183:445–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Motalleb M, Reihani E, Ghorbani R (2016) Optimal placement and sizing of the storage supporting transmission and distribution networks. Renew Energy 94:651–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Motalleb M, Branigan J, Ghorbani R (2017) Demand response aggregator stackelberg competition for selling stored energy. In: IEEE power & energy society general meeting

  9. Motalleb M, Ghorbani R (2017) Non-cooperative game-theoretic model of demand response aggregator competition for selling stored energy in storage devices. Appl Energy 202:581–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahdi Motalleb.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Motalleb, M., Branigan, J. & Ghorbani, R. Poster abstract: demand response market considering dynamic pricing. Comput Sci Res Dev 33, 257–258 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00450-017-0371-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00450-017-0371-6

Keywords

Navigation