Skip to main content
Log in

On a generalization of the Youla–Kučera parametrization. Part II: the lattice approach to MIMO systems

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mathematics of Control, Signals and Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Within the lattice approach to analysis and synthesis problems recently developed in Quadrat (Signal Syst, to appear), we obtain a general parametrization of all stabilizing controllers for internally stabilizable multi input multi output (MIMO) plants which do not necessarily admit doubly coprime factorizations. This parametrization is a linear fractional transformation of free parameters and the set of arbitrary parameters is characterized. This parametrization generalizes for MIMO plants the parametrization obtained in Quadrat (Syst Control Lett 50:135–148, 2003) for single input single output plants. It is named general Q-parametrization of all stabilizing controllers as we show that some ideas developed in this paper can be traced back to the pioneering work of Zames and Francis (IEEE Trans Automat control 28:585-601, 1983) on H -control. Finally, if the plant admits a doubly coprime factorization, we then prove that the general Q-parametrization becomes the well-known Youla-Kučera parametrization of all stabilizing controllers (Desoer et al. IEEE Trans Automat control 25:399–412, 1980; Vidyasagar, Control system synthesis: a factorization approach MIT Press, Cambridge 1985).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anantharam V (1985) On stabilization and existence of coprime factorizations. IEEE Trans Automat Control 30:1030–1031

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bonnet C, Partington JR (2005) Stabilization of a class of delay systems using PI methods. INRIA report RR-5583

  3. Bourbaki N (1989) Commutative algebra, Chapts 1–7, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New york

  4. Coquand T, Lombardi H, Quitté C (2004) Generating non-Noetherian modules constructively. Manuscripta Mathematica 115:513–520

    Google Scholar 

  5. Curtain RF, Zwart HJ (1991) An introduction to infinite-dimensional linear systems theory, TAM 21, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New york

  6. Desoer CA, Liu RW, Murray J, Saeks R (1980) Feedback system design: the fractional representation approach to analysis and synthesis. IEEE Trans Automat Control 25:399–412

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eisenbud D, Evans EG, Jr (1973) Generating modules efficiently: theorems from algebraic K-theory J. Algebra 27:278–305

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fuhrmann PA (1976) Algebraic system theory: an analyst's point of view. J Franklin Inst 301:521–540

    Google Scholar 

  9. Georgiou TT, Smith MC (1990) Optimal robustness in the gap metric. IEEE Trans Automat Control 35:673–685

    Google Scholar 

  10. Heitmann RC (1984) Generating non-Noetherian modules efficiently. Michigan Math 31:167–180

    Google Scholar 

  11. Khargonekar PP, Sontag ED (1982) On the relation between stable matrix fraction factorizations and regulable realizations of linear systems over rings. IEEE Trans Automat Control 27:627–638

    Google Scholar 

  12. Knebusch M, Zhang D (2002) Manis valuations and Prüfer extensions I. a new chapter in commutative algebra. Lecture notes in mathematics 1791, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  13. Kučera V (1979) Discrete linear control: the polynomial equation approach, Wiley, New York

  14. Lam TY (1978) Serre's conjecture, Lecture notes in mathematics 635, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  15. Lin Z (2001) Output feedback stabilizability and stabilization of linear n-D systems. In: Galkowski k, Wood J, Francis (eds) Multidimensional signals, circuits and systems,

  16. Logemann H (1993) Stabilization and regulation of infinite-dimensional systems using coprime factorizations. In: Analysis and optimization of systems: state and frequency domain approaches for infinite-dimensional systems, Lecture notes in control and information 185, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  17. Mori K (2002) Parametrization of the stabilizing controllers over a commutative ring with applications to multidimensional systems. IEEE Trans Circ Sys 49:743–752

    Google Scholar 

  18. Quadrat A (2003) The fractional representation approach to synthesis problems: an algebraic analysis viewpoint. part I: (weakly) doubly coprime factorizations. part II: internal stabilization. SIAM J Control Optim 42:266–299, 300–320

  19. Quadrat A (2003) On a generalization of the Youla–Kučera parametrization. part I: The fractional ideal approach to SISO systems. Syst Control Lett 50:135–148

    Google Scholar 

  20. Quadrat A (2004) On a general structure of the stabilizing controllers based on stable range. SIAM J Control Optim 42:2264–2285

    Google Scholar 

  21. Quadrat A (2005) A lattice approach to analysis and synthesis problems. Math control Signals Syst (to appear)

  22. Quadrat A (2005) An algebraic interpretation to the operator-theoretic approach to stabilizability. part I: SISO systems. Acta Applicandæ Mathematicæ 88:1–45

    Google Scholar 

  23. Quadrat A (2003) A generalization of the Youla–Kučera parametrization for MIMO stabilizable systems. In: Proceedings of the workshop on time-delay systems (TDS03), 08-10/09/03, IFAC Workshop, INRIA Rocquencourt, France

  24. Quadrat A (2004) Every internally stabilizable multidimensional system admits a doubly coprime factorization. In: Proceedings of mathematical theory of networks and systems (MTNS04), 05-09/07/04, Leuven, Belgium

  25. Quadrat A (2004) ``Stabilizing'' the stabilizing controllers. In: Proceedings of mathematical theory of networks and systems (MTNS04), 05-09/07/04, Leuven, Belgium

  26. Rotman JJ (1979) An introduction to homological algebra. Academic Press, New York

  27. Shankar S, Sule VR (1992) Algebraic geometric aspects of feedback stabilization. SIAM J Control Optim 30:11–30

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sontag ED (1977) The lattice of minimal realizations of response maps over rings. Math Systems Theory 11:169–175

    Google Scholar 

  29. Srinivasan VK, Hu Shaing (1979) A theorem in Banach algebras and its applications. Bull Austral Math Soc 20:247–252

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sule VR (1994) Feedback stabilization over commutative rings: the matrix case. SIAM J Control Optim 32:1675–1695

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sule VR (1998) Corrigendum. SIAM J Control Optim 36:2194–2195

  32. Read CJ (2001) All primes have closed range. Bull Lond Math Soc 33:341–346

    Google Scholar 

  33. Vidyasagar M (1985) Control system synthesis: a Factorization Approach, MIT Press, Cambridge

  34. Youla DC, Bongiorno JJ, Jabr HA (1976) Modern Wiener-Hopf design of optimal controllers, part II: The multivariable case. IEEE Trans Automat Control 21:319–338

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zames G, Francis BA (1983) Feedback, minimax sensitivity, and optimal robustness. IEEE Trans Automat Control 28:585–601

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Quadrat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Quadrat, A. On a generalization of the Youla–Kučera parametrization. Part II: the lattice approach to MIMO systems. Math. Control Signals Syst. 18, 199–235 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00498-005-0160-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00498-005-0160-9

Keywords