Skip to main content
Log in

Communication Gap Management for Fertile Community

  • Focus
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the paper, we first present an approach to extract social networks from message boards on the Internet. Then we propose communication gaps based on structural features of the social networks as an indicator of understanding the state of communication. After we classify 3,000 social networks into three types of communication, i.e., interactive communication, distributed communication, and soapbox communication, we suggest communication gap management to identify the types of communication, the roles of individuals, and important ties, all of which can be used for drawing up a plan for realizing fertile community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bavelas A (1950) Communication patterns in task-oriented groups. J Acoust Soc Am 22:725–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Freeman LC (1978) Centrality in social networks. Soc Netw 1:215–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Goldberg DE, Welge M, Llorà X (2003) DISCUS: distributed innovation and scalable collaboration. In: Uncertaion settings, IlliGAL Report No. 2003017

  4. Goldberg DE (2002) The design of innovation. Kluwer

  5. Granovetter M (1973) The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol 78:1360–1380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Krackhardt D, Hanson JR (1993) Informal networks: the company behind the chart. Harvard Business Rev July-August:104–111

  7. Matsumura N (2003) Topic diffusion in a community. In: Ohsawa Y, McBurney P (eds) Chance discovery. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg Newyork, pp 84–97

    Google Scholar 

  8. Matsumura N, Miura A, Shibanai Y, Ohsawa Y, Nishida T (2005) The dynamism of 2channel. J AI & Soc 19:84–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Milgram S (1967) The small world problem. Psychol Today 1:61–67

    Google Scholar 

  10. Moreno JL (1934) Who Shall Survive?. Beacon House, Beacon

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ohsawa Y, Soma H, Matsuo Y, Matsumura N, Usui M (2002) Featuring web communities based on word co-occurrence structure of communications. In: Proceedings of WWW2002, pp 736–742

  12. Ohsawa Y, McBurney P (eds) Chance discovery. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg Newyork

  13. Rogers EM (1962) Diffusion of innovations, 4th edn. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Scott WR (1992) Organizations: rational, natural, and open systems. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tyler JR, Wilkinson DM, Huberman BA (2003) Email as spectroscopy: automated discovery of community structure within organizations (Preprint http://www.lanl.gov/arXiv:cond-mat/0303264)

  16. Wallace P (1999) The psychology of the internet. Cambridge University Press

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naohiro Matsumura.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matsumura, N., Goldberg, D.E. & Llorà, X. Communication Gap Management for Fertile Community. Soft Comput 11, 791–798 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-006-0121-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-006-0121-3

Keywords

Navigation