Skip to main content
Log in

Very and more or less in non-commutative fuzzy logic

  • Focus
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we consider fuzzy subsets of a universe as L-fuzzy subsets instead of [ 0, 1 ]-valued, where L is a complete lattice. We enrich the lattice L by adding some suitable operations to make it into a pseudo-BL algebra. Since BL algebras are main frameworks of fuzzy logic, we propose to consider the non-commutative BL-algebras which are more natural for modeling the fuzzy notions. Based on reasoning with in non-commutative fuzzy logic we model the linguistic modifiers such as very and more or less and give an appropriate membership function for each one by taking into account the context of the given fuzzy notion by means of resemblance L-fuzzy relations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • De Cock M, Kerre EE (2002) A context-based approach to linguistic hedges. Int J Appl Math Comput Sci 12:371–382

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Di Nola A, Georgescu G, Iorgulescu A (2002a) Pseudo-BL algebras I. Multi Val Log 8:673–714

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Di Nola A, Georgescu G, Iorgulescu A (2002b) Pseudo-BL algebras II. Multi Val Log 8:717–750

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Flondor P, Georgescu G, Iorgulesu A (2001) Pseudo-t-norms and pseudo-BL algebras. Soft Comput 5:355–371

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Goguen J (1967) L-fuzzy sets. J Math Anal Appl 18:145–174

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hajek P (1998) Methamathemathics of fuzzy logic. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellendoorn H (1990) Reasoning with fuzzy Logic. T. U. Delft, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff G (1973) Hedges, a study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. J Pill Log 2:458–508

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Novák V, Perfilieva I (1990) Evaluating linguistic expressions and functional fuzzy theories in fuzzy logic. In: Zadeh LA, Kacprzyck J (eds) Computing with words in information/intelligent systems 1: foundations. Springer, Heilberg, pp 383–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Ruan D, Liu j (1999) Uncertainty automated reasoning in intelligent learning of soft knowledge. In: Proceedings of the ICST workshop information and communication technology for teaching and training, Gent, Belgium, pp 29–45

  • Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1972) A fuzzy-set-theoretic interpretation of linguistic hedges. J Cybern 2:4–34

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Esfandiar Eslami.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eslami, E., Khosravi, H. & Sadeghi, F. Very and more or less in non-commutative fuzzy logic. Soft Comput 12, 275–279 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-007-0199-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-007-0199-2

Keywords

Navigation